From 16a8c4d2382d72aa414d89192422187acd290270 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Klabnik Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:30:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Don't use 'synonym' with regards to newtypes Fixes #20037. --- src/doc/trpl/compound-data-types.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/doc/trpl/compound-data-types.md b/src/doc/trpl/compound-data-types.md index afa890b84b40..a63551ae924b 100644 --- a/src/doc/trpl/compound-data-types.md +++ b/src/doc/trpl/compound-data-types.md @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ and with a struct, we have actual names. There _is_ one case when a tuple struct is very useful, though, and that's a tuple struct with only one element. We call this a *newtype*, because it lets -you create a new type that's a synonym for another one: +you create a new type that's similar to another one: ```{rust} struct Inches(i32);