tests: add #![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]

After reviewing all tests with `?Sized` and discussing with lcnr, these
tests seem like they could probably benefit from
`#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]`.

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/coherence/coherence-fulfill-overflow.rs

@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver=coherence
 
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 #![recursion_limit = "10"]
 
 trait Trait {}
 
-struct W<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
+struct W<T>(*const T);
 trait TwoW {}
-impl<T: ?Sized + TwoW> TwoW for W<W<T>> {}
+impl<T: TwoW> TwoW for W<W<T>> {}
 
-impl<T: ?Sized + TwoW> Trait for W<T> {}
-impl<T: ?Sized + TwoW> Trait for T {}
+impl<T: TwoW> Trait for W<T> {}
+impl<T: TwoW> Trait for T {}
 //~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `Trait` for type `W
 
 fn main() {}

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/coherence/coherence-fulfill-overflow.stderr

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Trait` for type `W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<_>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>`
-  --> $DIR/coherence-fulfill-overflow.rs:12:1
+  --> $DIR/coherence-fulfill-overflow.rs:14:1
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized + TwoW> Trait for W<T> {}
-   | ------------------------------------- first implementation here
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized + TwoW> Trait for T {}
-   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<_>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>`
+LL | impl<T: TwoW> Trait for W<T> {}
+   | ---------------------------- first implementation here
+LL | impl<T: TwoW> Trait for T {}
+   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<W<_>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>`
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/coinduction/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 //@ revisions: with without
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
 #![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 // This test is incredibly subtle. At its core the goal is to get a coinductive cycle,
 // which, depending on its root goal, either holds or errors. We achieve this by getting
@@ -17,20 +18,20 @@
 // test for that.
 
 #[rustc_coinductive]
-trait Trait<T: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized> {}
-struct A<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
-struct B<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
+trait Trait<T, V, D> {}
+struct A<T>(*const T);
+struct B<T>(*const T);
 
-trait IncompleteGuidance<T: ?Sized, V: ?Sized> {}
-impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized + 'static> IncompleteGuidance<U, u8> for T {}
-impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized + 'static> IncompleteGuidance<U, i8> for T {}
-impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized + 'static> IncompleteGuidance<U, i16> for T {}
+trait IncompleteGuidance<T, V> {}
+impl<T, U: 'static> IncompleteGuidance<U, u8> for T {}
+impl<T, U: 'static> IncompleteGuidance<U, i8> for T {}
+impl<T, U: 'static> IncompleteGuidance<U, i16> for T {}
 
-trait ImplGuidance<T: ?Sized, V: ?Sized> {}
-impl<T: ?Sized> ImplGuidance<u32, u8> for T {}
-impl<T: ?Sized> ImplGuidance<i32, i8> for T {}
+trait ImplGuidance<T, V> {}
+impl<T> ImplGuidance<u32, u8> for T {}
+impl<T> ImplGuidance<i32, i8> for T {}
 
-impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized> Trait<U, V, D> for A<T>
+impl<T, U, V, D> Trait<U, V, D> for A<T>
 where
     T: IncompleteGuidance<U, V>,
     A<T>: Trait<U, D, V>,
@@ -39,17 +40,17 @@ where
 {
 }
 
-trait ToU8<T: ?Sized> {}
+trait ToU8<T> {}
 impl ToU8<u8> for () {}
 
-impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized> Trait<U, V, D> for B<T>
+impl<T, U, V, D> Trait<U, V, D> for B<T>
 where
     T: ImplGuidance<U, V>,
     A<T>: Trait<U, V, D>,
 {
 }
 
-fn impls_trait<T: ?Sized + Trait<U, V, D>, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized>() {}
+fn impls_trait<T: Trait<U, V, D>, U, V, D>() {}
 
 fn with_bound<X>()
 where

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/coinduction/incompleteness-unstable-result.with.stderr

@@ -1,25 +1,25 @@
 error[E0277]: the trait bound `A<X>: Trait<_, _, _>` is not satisfied
-  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:65:19
+  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:66:19
    |
 LL |     impls_trait::<A<X>, _, _, _>();
    |                   ^^^^ the trait `Trait<_, _, _>` is not implemented for `A<X>`
    |
    = help: the trait `Trait<U, V, D>` is implemented for `A<T>`
 note: required for `A<X>` to implement `Trait<_, _, _>`
-  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:33:50
+  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:34:18
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized> Trait<U, V, D> for A<T>
-   |                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^
+LL | impl<T, U, V, D> Trait<U, V, D> for A<T>
+   |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^
 ...
 LL |     A<T>: Trait<U, D, V>,
    |           -------------- unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
    = note: 8 redundant requirements hidden
    = note: required for `A<X>` to implement `Trait<_, _, _>`
 note: required by a bound in `impls_trait`
-  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:52:28
+  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:53:19
    |
-LL | fn impls_trait<T: ?Sized + Trait<U, V, D>, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized>() {}
-   |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `impls_trait`
+LL | fn impls_trait<T: Trait<U, V, D>, U, V, D>() {}
+   |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `impls_trait`
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/coinduction/incompleteness-unstable-result.without.stderr

@@ -1,25 +1,25 @@
 error[E0277]: the trait bound `A<X>: Trait<_, _, _>` is not satisfied
-  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:65:19
+  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:66:19
    |
 LL |     impls_trait::<A<X>, _, _, _>();
    |                   ^^^^ the trait `Trait<_, _, _>` is not implemented for `A<X>`
    |
    = help: the trait `Trait<U, V, D>` is implemented for `A<T>`
 note: required for `A<X>` to implement `Trait<_, _, _>`
-  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:33:50
+  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:34:18
    |
-LL | impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized> Trait<U, V, D> for A<T>
-   |                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^
+LL | impl<T, U, V, D> Trait<U, V, D> for A<T>
+   |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^
 ...
 LL |     A<T>: Trait<U, D, V>,
    |           -------------- unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
    = note: 8 redundant requirements hidden
    = note: required for `A<X>` to implement `Trait<_, _, _>`
 note: required by a bound in `impls_trait`
-  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:52:28
+  --> $DIR/incompleteness-unstable-result.rs:53:19
    |
-LL | fn impls_trait<T: ?Sized + Trait<U, V, D>, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized, D: ?Sized>() {}
-   |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `impls_trait`
+LL | fn impls_trait<T: Trait<U, V, D>, U, V, D>() {}
+   |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `impls_trait`
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/fixpoint-rerun-all-cycle-heads.rs

@@ -1,23 +1,24 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
 #![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 // Check that we correctly rerun the trait solver for heads of cycles,
 // even if they are not the root.
 
-struct A<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
-struct B<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
-struct C<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
+struct A<T>(*const T);
+struct B<T>(*const T);
+struct C<T>(*const T);
 
 #[rustc_coinductive]
 trait Trait<'a, 'b> {}
 trait NotImplemented {}
 
-impl<'a, 'b, T: ?Sized> Trait<'a, 'b> for A<T> where B<T>: Trait<'a, 'b> {}
+impl<'a, 'b, T> Trait<'a, 'b> for A<T> where B<T>: Trait<'a, 'b> {}
 
 // With this the root of `B<T>` is `A<T>`, even if the other impl does
 // not have a cycle with `A<T>`. This candidate never applies because of
 // the `A<T>: NotImplemented` bound.
-impl<'a, 'b, T: ?Sized> Trait<'a, 'b> for B<T>
+impl<'a, 'b, T> Trait<'a, 'b> for B<T>
 where
     A<T>: Trait<'a, 'b>,
     A<T>: NotImplemented,
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ where
 // use the impl itself to prove that adds region constraints as we uniquified the
 // regions in the `A<T>: Trait<'a, 'b>` where-bound. As both the impl above
 // and the impl below now apply with some constraints, we failed with ambiguity.
-impl<'a, 'b, T: ?Sized> Trait<'a, 'b> for B<T>
+impl<'a, 'b, T> Trait<'a, 'b> for B<T>
 where
     A<T>: NotImplemented,
 {}
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ where
 //
 // Because of the coinductive cycle through `C<T>` it also requires
 // 'a to be 'static.
-impl<'a, T: ?Sized> Trait<'a, 'static> for B<T>
+impl<'a, T> Trait<'a, 'static> for B<T>
 where
     C<T>: Trait<'a, 'a>,
 {}
@@ -48,14 +49,14 @@ where
 // In the first iteration of `B<T>: Trait<'a, 'b>` we don't add any
 // constraints here, only after setting the provisional result to require
 // `'b == 'static` do we also add that constraint for `'a`.
-impl<'a, 'b, T: ?Sized> Trait<'a, 'b> for C<T>
+impl<'a, 'b, T> Trait<'a, 'b> for C<T>
 where
     B<T>: Trait<'a, 'b>,
 {}
 
-fn impls_trait<'a, 'b, T: Trait<'a, 'b> + ?Sized>() {}
+fn impls_trait<'a, 'b, T: Trait<'a, 'b>>() {}
 
-fn check<'a, T: ?Sized>() {
+fn check<'a, T>() {
     impls_trait::<'a, 'static, A<T>>();
     //~^ ERROR lifetime may not live long enough
 }

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/fixpoint-rerun-all-cycle-heads.stderr

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 error: lifetime may not live long enough
-  --> $DIR/fixpoint-rerun-all-cycle-heads.rs:59:5
+  --> $DIR/fixpoint-rerun-all-cycle-heads.rs:60:5
    |
-LL | fn check<'a, T: ?Sized>() {
+LL | fn check<'a, T>() {
    |          -- lifetime `'a` defined here
 LL |     impls_trait::<'a, 'static, A<T>>();
    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ requires that `'a` must outlive `'static`

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/inductive-fixpoint-hang.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 // This currently hangs if we do not erase constraints from
 // overflow.
@@ -17,9 +19,9 @@
 // the solver to hang without hitting the recursion limit.
 trait Trait {}
 
-struct W<T: ?Sized>(*const T);
+struct W<T>(*const T);
 
-impl<T: ?Sized> Trait for W<W<T>>
+impl<T> Trait for W<W<T>>
 where
     W<T>: Trait,
     W<T>: Trait,

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/inductive-fixpoint-hang.stderr

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 error[E0275]: overflow evaluating the requirement `W<_>: Trait`
-  --> $DIR/inductive-fixpoint-hang.rs:31:19
+  --> $DIR/inductive-fixpoint-hang.rs:33:19
    |
 LL |     impls_trait::<W<_>>();
    |                   ^^^^
    |
 note: required by a bound in `impls_trait`
-  --> $DIR/inductive-fixpoint-hang.rs:28:19
+  --> $DIR/inductive-fixpoint-hang.rs:30:19
    |
 LL | fn impls_trait<T: Trait>() {}
    |                   ^^^^^ required by this bound in `impls_trait`

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/cycles/provisional-cache-impacts-behavior.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
 //@ check-pass
 #![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 // A test showcasing that using a provisional cache can differ
 // from only tracking stack entries.
@@ -59,9 +60,9 @@ trait B {}
 #[rustc_coinductive]
 trait C {}
 
-impl<T: ?Sized + B + C> A for T {}
-impl<T: ?Sized + A + C> B for T {}
-impl<T: ?Sized + B> C for T {}
+impl<T: B + C> A for T {}
+impl<T: A + C> B for T {}
+impl<T: B> C for T {}
 
 fn impls_a<T: A>() {}
 

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/dont-canonicalize-re-error.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 trait Tr<'a> {}
 
@@ -16,9 +18,9 @@ trait Tr<'a> {}
 // Then, when we recompute the goal `W<?0>: Constrain<'error>`, when
 // collecting ambiguities and overflows, we end up assembling a default
 // error candidate w/o ambiguity, which causes the goal to pass, and ICE.
-impl<'a, A: ?Sized> Tr<'a> for W<A> {}
-struct W<A: ?Sized>(A);
-impl<'a, A: ?Sized> Tr<'a> for A where A: Constrain<'a> {}
+impl<'a, A> Tr<'a> for W<A> {}
+struct W<A>(A);
+impl<'a, A> Tr<'a> for A where A: Constrain<'a> {}
 //~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `Tr<'_>` for type `W<_>`
 
 trait Constrain<'a> {}

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/dont-canonicalize-re-error.stderr

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error[E0261]: use of undeclared lifetime name `'missing`
-  --> $DIR/dont-canonicalize-re-error.rs:25:26
+  --> $DIR/dont-canonicalize-re-error.rs:27:26
    |
 LL | impl<A: Sized> Constrain<'missing> for W<A> {}
    |      -                   ^^^^^^^^ undeclared lifetime
@@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ LL | impl<A: Sized> Constrain<'missing> for W<A> {}
    |      help: consider introducing lifetime `'missing` here: `'missing,`
 
 error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Tr<'_>` for type `W<_>`
-  --> $DIR/dont-canonicalize-re-error.rs:21:1
+  --> $DIR/dont-canonicalize-re-error.rs:23:1
    |
-LL | impl<'a, A: ?Sized> Tr<'a> for W<A> {}
-   | ----------------------------------- first implementation here
-LL | struct W<A: ?Sized>(A);
-LL | impl<'a, A: ?Sized> Tr<'a> for A where A: Constrain<'a> {}
-   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `W<_>`
+LL | impl<'a, A> Tr<'a> for W<A> {}
+   | --------------------------- first implementation here
+LL | struct W<A>(A);
+LL | impl<'a, A> Tr<'a> for A where A: Constrain<'a> {}
+   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `W<_>`
 
 error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
 

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/normalize/normalize-region-obligations.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 //@ revisions: normalize_param_env normalize_obligation hrtb
 //@ check-pass
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 trait Foo {
     #[cfg(normalize_param_env)]
@@ -11,11 +13,11 @@ trait Foo {
     type Gat<'b> where for<'a> <Self as MirrorRegion<'a>>::Assoc: 'b;
 }
 
-trait Mirror { type Assoc: ?Sized; }
-impl<T: ?Sized> Mirror for T { type Assoc = T; }
+trait Mirror { type Assoc; }
+impl<T> Mirror for T { type Assoc = T; }
 
-trait MirrorRegion<'a> { type Assoc: ?Sized; }
-impl<'a, T: ?Sized> MirrorRegion<'a> for T { type Assoc = T; }
+trait MirrorRegion<'a> { type Assoc; }
+impl<'a, T> MirrorRegion<'a> for T { type Assoc = T; }
 
 impl<T> Foo for T {
     #[cfg(normalize_param_env)]

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/overflow/coherence-alias-hang.rs

@@ -4,16 +4,18 @@
 // Regression test for nalgebra hang <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130056>.
 
 #![feature(lazy_type_alias)]
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 #![allow(incomplete_features)]
 
-type Id<T: ?Sized> = T;
+type Id<T> = T;
 trait NotImplemented {}
 
-struct W<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(*const T, *const U);
+struct W<T, U>(*const T, *const U);
 trait Trait {
-    type Assoc: ?Sized;
+    type Assoc;
 }
-impl<T: ?Sized + Trait> Trait for W<T, T> {
+impl<T: Trait> Trait for W<T, T> {
     #[cfg(ai)]
     type Assoc = W<T::Assoc, Id<T::Assoc>>;
     #[cfg(ia)]
@@ -22,8 +24,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized + Trait> Trait for W<T, T> {
     type Assoc = W<Id<T::Assoc>, Id<T::Assoc>>;
 }
 
-trait Overlap<T: ?Sized> {}
-impl<T: ?Sized> Overlap<T> for W<T, T> {}
-impl<T: ?Sized + Trait + NotImplemented> Overlap<T::Assoc> for T {}
+trait Overlap<T> {}
+impl<T> Overlap<T> for W<T, T> {}
+impl<T: Trait + NotImplemented> Overlap<T::Assoc> for T {}
 
 fn main() {}

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/overflow/recursion-limit-normalizes-to-constraints.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver=coherence
 //@ check-pass
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 // A regression test for trait-system-refactor-initiative#70.
 
@@ -7,8 +9,8 @@ trait Trait {
     type Assoc;
 }
 
-struct W<T: ?Sized>(*mut T);
-impl<T: ?Sized> Trait for W<W<T>>
+struct W<T>(*mut T);
+impl<T> Trait for W<W<T>>
 where
     W<T>: Trait,
 {
@@ -20,6 +22,6 @@ impl<T: Trait<Assoc = u32>> NoOverlap for T {}
 // `Projection(<W<_> as Trait>::Assoc, u32)` should result in error even
 // though applying the impl results in overflow. This is necessary to match
 // the behavior of the old solver.
-impl<T: ?Sized> NoOverlap for W<T> {}
+impl<T> NoOverlap for W<T> {}
 
 fn main() {}

tests/ui/traits/next-solver/supertrait-alias-1.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 //@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
 //@ check-pass
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
 
 // Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/171>.
 // Tests that we don't try to replace `<V as Super>::Output` when replacing projections in the
@@ -13,9 +15,9 @@ pub trait Super {
     type Output;
 }
 
-fn bound<T: Trait + ?Sized>() {}
+fn bound<T: Trait>() {}
 
-fn visit_simd_operator<V: Super + ?Sized>() {
+fn visit_simd_operator<V: Super>() {
     bound::<dyn Trait<Output = <V as Super>::Output>>();
 }
 

tests/ui/traits/overflow-computing-ambiguity.rs

@@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]
+
 trait Hello {}
 
-struct Foo<'a, T: ?Sized>(&'a T);
+struct Foo<'a, T>(&'a T);
 
-impl<'a, T: ?Sized> Hello for Foo<'a, &'a T> where Foo<'a, T>: Hello {}
+impl<'a, T> Hello for Foo<'a, &'a T> where Foo<'a, T>: Hello {}
 
 impl Hello for Foo<'static, i32> {}
 
-fn hello<T: ?Sized + Hello>() {}
+fn hello<T: Hello>() {}
 
 fn main() {
     hello();

tests/ui/traits/overflow-computing-ambiguity.stderr

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error[E0283]: type annotations needed
-  --> $DIR/overflow-computing-ambiguity.rs:12:5
+  --> $DIR/overflow-computing-ambiguity.rs:15:5
    |
 LL |     hello();
    |     ^^^^^ cannot infer type of the type parameter `T` declared on the function `hello`
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ LL |     hello();
              Foo<'a, &'a T>
              Foo<'static, i32>
 note: required by a bound in `hello`
-  --> $DIR/overflow-computing-ambiguity.rs:9:22
+  --> $DIR/overflow-computing-ambiguity.rs:12:13
    |
-LL | fn hello<T: ?Sized + Hello>() {}
-   |                      ^^^^^ required by this bound in `hello`
+LL | fn hello<T: Hello>() {}
+   |             ^^^^^ required by this bound in `hello`
 help: consider specifying the generic argument
    |
 LL |     hello::<T>();