From 1fd85b1a80429a5d217424b2e7f51d0082713b9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andre Bogus <bogusandre@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:19:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixed compile-fail test

---
 src/test/compile-fail/rfc1623.rs | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/test/compile-fail/rfc1623.rs b/src/test/compile-fail/rfc1623.rs
index 840307ea456e..963459b27bf1 100644
--- a/src/test/compile-fail/rfc1623.rs
+++ b/src/test/compile-fail/rfc1623.rs
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ fn non_elidable<'a, 'b>(a: &'a u8, b: &'b u8) -> &'a u8 { a }
 
 // the boundaries of elision
 static NON_ELIDABLE_FN : &fn(&u8, &u8) -> &u8 =
-//^ERROR: missing lifetime specifier
+//~^ ERROR: missing lifetime specifier
         &(non_elidable as fn(&u8, &u8) -> &u8);
 
 type Baz<'a> = fn(&'a [u8]) -> Option<u8>;
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ static STATIC_BAZ : &Baz<'static> = &(baz as Baz);
 const CONST_BAZ : &Baz<'static> = &(baz as Baz);
 
 fn main() {
-    let y = [1u8, 2, 3];
+    let x = &[1u8, 2, 3];
+    let y = x;
 
     //surprisingly this appears to work, so lifetime < `'static` is valid
     assert_eq!(Some(1), STATIC_BAZ(y));