Use the per-tree state to detect and permit DAGs (but not cyclic graphs)
This commit is contained in:
parent
37815fde39
commit
35d6efb232
1 changed files with 80 additions and 41 deletions
|
|
@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ pub struct GlobalFulfilledPredicates<'tcx> {
|
|||
dep_graph: DepGraph,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct LocalFulfilledPredicates<'tcx> {
|
||||
set: FnvHashSet<ty::Predicate<'tcx>>
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -66,7 +67,8 @@ pub struct FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
// A list of all obligations that have been registered with this
|
||||
// fulfillment context.
|
||||
predicates: ObligationForest<PendingPredicateObligation<'tcx>, ()>,
|
||||
predicates: ObligationForest<PendingPredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
LocalFulfilledPredicates<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
// A set of constraints that regionck must validate. Each
|
||||
// constraint has the form `T:'a`, meaning "some type `T` must
|
||||
|
|
@ -192,7 +194,7 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
obligation: obligation,
|
||||
stalled_on: vec![]
|
||||
};
|
||||
self.predicates.push_tree(obligation, ());
|
||||
self.predicates.push_tree(obligation, LocalFulfilledPredicates::new());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn region_obligations(&self,
|
||||
|
|
@ -278,7 +280,8 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
let outcome = {
|
||||
let region_obligations = &mut self.region_obligations;
|
||||
self.predicates.process_obligations(
|
||||
|obligation, _tree, backtrace| process_predicate(selcx,
|
||||
|obligation, tree, backtrace| process_predicate(selcx,
|
||||
tree,
|
||||
obligation,
|
||||
backtrace,
|
||||
region_obligations))
|
||||
|
|
@ -315,61 +318,97 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Like `process_predicate1`, but wrap result into a pending predicate.
|
||||
fn process_predicate<'a,'tcx>(selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'a,'tcx>,
|
||||
tree_cache: &mut LocalFulfilledPredicates<'tcx>,
|
||||
pending_obligation: &mut PendingPredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
backtrace: Backtrace<PendingPredicateObligation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
mut backtrace: Backtrace<PendingPredicateObligation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
region_obligations: &mut NodeMap<Vec<RegionObligation<'tcx>>>)
|
||||
-> Result<Option<Vec<PendingPredicateObligation<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
FulfillmentErrorCode<'tcx>>
|
||||
{
|
||||
match process_predicate1(selcx, pending_obligation, backtrace, region_obligations) {
|
||||
match process_predicate1(selcx, pending_obligation, backtrace.clone(), region_obligations) {
|
||||
Ok(Some(v)) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#30977) the right thing to do here, I think, is to permit
|
||||
// DAGs. That is, we should detect whenever this predicate
|
||||
// has appeared somewhere in the current tree./ If it's a
|
||||
// parent, that's a cycle, and we should either error out
|
||||
// or consider it ok. But if it's NOT a parent, we can
|
||||
// ignore it, since it will be proven (or not) separately.
|
||||
// However, this is a touch tricky, so I'm doing something
|
||||
// a bit hackier for now so that the `huge-struct.rs` passes.
|
||||
// FIXME(#30977) The code below is designed to detect (and
|
||||
// permit) DAGs, while still ensuring that the reasoning
|
||||
// is acyclic. However, it does a few things
|
||||
// suboptimally. For example, it refreshes type variables
|
||||
// a lot, probably more than needed, but also less than
|
||||
// you might want.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// - more than needed: I want to be very sure we don't
|
||||
// accidentally treat a cycle as a DAG, so I am
|
||||
// refreshing type variables as we walk the ancestors;
|
||||
// but we are going to repeat this a lot, which is
|
||||
// sort of silly, and it would be nicer to refresh
|
||||
// them *in place* so that later predicate processing
|
||||
// can benefit from the same work;
|
||||
// - less than you might want: we only add items in the cache here,
|
||||
// but maybe we learn more about type variables and could add them into
|
||||
// the cache later on.
|
||||
|
||||
let tcx = selcx.tcx();
|
||||
|
||||
let retain_vec: Vec<_> = {
|
||||
let mut dedup = FnvHashSet();
|
||||
v.iter()
|
||||
.map(|o| {
|
||||
// Compute a little FnvHashSet for the ancestors. We only
|
||||
// do this the first time that we care.
|
||||
let mut cache = None;
|
||||
let mut is_ancestor = |predicate: &ty::Predicate<'tcx>| {
|
||||
if cache.is_none() {
|
||||
let mut c = FnvHashSet();
|
||||
for ancestor in backtrace.by_ref() {
|
||||
// Ugh. This just feels ridiculously
|
||||
// inefficient. But we need to compare
|
||||
// predicates without being concerned about
|
||||
// the vagaries of type inference, so for now
|
||||
// just ensure that they are always
|
||||
// up-to-date. (I suppose we could just use a
|
||||
// snapshot and check if they are unifiable?)
|
||||
let resolved_predicate =
|
||||
selcx.infcx().resolve_type_vars_if_possible(
|
||||
&ancestor.obligation.predicate);
|
||||
c.insert(resolved_predicate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
cache = Some(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cache.as_ref().unwrap().contains(predicate)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let pending_predicate_obligations: Vec<_> =
|
||||
v.into_iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|obligation| {
|
||||
// Probably silly, but remove any inference
|
||||
// variables. This is actually crucial to the
|
||||
// ancestor check below, but it's not clear that
|
||||
// it makes sense to ALWAYS do it.
|
||||
let obligation = selcx.infcx().resolve_type_vars_if_possible(&obligation);
|
||||
|
||||
// Screen out obligations that we know globally
|
||||
// are true. This should really be the DAG check
|
||||
// mentioned above.
|
||||
if tcx.fulfilled_predicates.borrow().check_duplicate(&o.predicate) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if tcx.fulfilled_predicates.borrow().check_duplicate(&obligation.predicate) {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we see two siblings that are exactly the
|
||||
// same, no need to add them twice.
|
||||
if !dedup.insert(&o.predicate) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// Check whether this obligation appears somewhere else in the tree.
|
||||
if tree_cache.is_duplicate_or_add(&obligation.predicate) {
|
||||
// If the obligation appears as a parent,
|
||||
// allow it, because that is a cycle.
|
||||
// Otherwise though we can just ignore
|
||||
// it. Note that we have to be careful around
|
||||
// inference variables here -- for the
|
||||
// purposes of the ancestor check, we retain
|
||||
// the invariant that all type variables are
|
||||
// fully refreshed.
|
||||
if !(&mut is_ancestor)(&obligation.predicate) {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
true
|
||||
Some(PendingPredicateObligation {
|
||||
obligation: obligation,
|
||||
stalled_on: vec![]
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let pending_predicate_obligations =
|
||||
v.into_iter()
|
||||
.zip(retain_vec)
|
||||
.flat_map(|(o, retain)| {
|
||||
if retain {
|
||||
Some(PendingPredicateObligation {
|
||||
obligation: o,
|
||||
stalled_on: vec![]
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(Some(pending_predicate_obligations))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue