Rollup merge of #99511 - RalfJung:raw_eq, r=wesleywiser

make raw_eq precondition more restrictive

Specifically, don't allow comparing pointers that way. Comparing pointers is subtle because you have to talk about what happens to the provenance.

This matches what [Miri already implements](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=9eb1dfb8a61b5a2d4a7cee43df2717af), and all existing users are fine with this.

If raw_eq on pointers is ever desired, we can adjust the intrinsic spec and Miri implementation as needed, but for now that seems just unnecessary. Also, this is a const intrinsic, and in const, comparing pointers this way is *not possible* -- so if we allow the intrinsic to compare pointers in general, we need to impose an extra restrictions saying that in const-context, pointers are *not* okay.
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-08-11 22:53:01 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 37efd55210
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -173,13 +173,14 @@ macro_rules! is_raw_eq_comparable {
)+};
}
// SAFETY: All the ordinary integer types allow all bit patterns as distinct values
// SAFETY: All the ordinary integer types have no padding, and are not pointers.
is_raw_eq_comparable!(u8, u16, u32, u64, u128, usize, i8, i16, i32, i64, i128, isize);
// SAFETY: bool and char have *niches*, but no *padding*, so this is sound
// SAFETY: bool and char have *niches*, but no *padding* (and these are not pointer types), so this
// is sound
is_raw_eq_comparable!(bool, char);
// SAFETY: Similarly, the non-zero types have a niche, but no undef,
// SAFETY: Similarly, the non-zero types have a niche, but no undef and no pointers,
// and they compare like their underlying numeric type.
is_raw_eq_comparable!(
NonZeroU8,

View file

@ -2282,7 +2282,8 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
///
/// # Safety
///
/// It's UB to call this if any of the *bytes* in `*a` or `*b` are uninitialized.
/// It's UB to call this if any of the *bytes* in `*a` or `*b` are uninitialized or carry a
/// pointer value.
/// Note that this is a stricter criterion than just the *values* being
/// fully-initialized: if `T` has padding, it's UB to call this intrinsic.
///