From 3c2d9c2dbe0fd764b4af473a75fb4f44616f6b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 20:40:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix typo Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com> --- library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/alloc.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/alloc.rs b/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/alloc.rs index 242a054199f4..eb3a57c212b4 100644 --- a/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/alloc.rs +++ b/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/alloc.rs @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ cfg_if::cfg_if! { #[inline] unsafe fn aligned_malloc(layout: &Layout) -> *mut u8 { let mut out = ptr::null_mut(); - // We prefer posix_memalign over aligned_malloc since it is more widely available, and - // since with aligned_malloc, implementations are making almost arbitrary choices for + // We prefer posix_memalign over aligned_alloc since it is more widely available, and + // since with aligned_alloc, implementations are making almost arbitrary choices for // which alignments are "supported", making it hard to use. For instance, some // implementations require the size to be a multiple of the alignment (wasi emmalloc), // while others require the alignment to be at least the pointer size (Illumos, macOS).