From 5107af264dfd043161d80a42beccdf5f8d9b3113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 12:06:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add extra test to ensure the highlighting for macros is
 working as expected

---
 .../source-code-pages/macro-call-2.rs          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/rustdoc-html/source-code-pages/macro-call-2.rs

diff --git a/tests/rustdoc-html/source-code-pages/macro-call-2.rs b/tests/rustdoc-html/source-code-pages/macro-call-2.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d9c3df57c602
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/rustdoc-html/source-code-pages/macro-call-2.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// This is yet another test to ensure that only macro calls are considered as such
+// by the rustdoc highlighter, in particular when named `macro_rules`.
+// This is a regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/151904>.
+
+#![crate_name = "foo"]
+
+//@ has src/foo/macro-call-2.rs.html
+//@ count - '//code/span[@class="macro"]' 2
+//@ has - '//code/span[@class="macro"]' 'macro_rules!'
+//@ has - '//code/span[@class="macro"]' 'r#macro_rules!'
+
+macro_rules! r#macro_rules {
+    () => {
+        fn main() {}
+    }
+}
+
+r#macro_rules!();