From 582f060a17d4b4a4e007db25548d01670bbdc496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Felix S. Klock II" Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:12:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] markdown fix suggested during review. --- src/test/compile-fail/mir-dataflow/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/test/compile-fail/mir-dataflow/README.md b/src/test/compile-fail/mir-dataflow/README.md index eaf2cf7f8059..a3ab14b23c7d 100644 --- a/src/test/compile-fail/mir-dataflow/README.md +++ b/src/test/compile-fail/mir-dataflow/README.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ error is emitted by the compiler at that point; if it is a 0-bit, then that invocation of `rustc_peek` will emit an error with the message "rustc_peek: bit not set". -(*): Or `#[rustc_mir(rustc_peek_maybe_uninit)]`, and perhaps other +(\*): Or `#[rustc_mir(rustc_peek_maybe_uninit)]`, and perhaps other variants in the future. The end effect is that one can write unit tests for MIR dataflow that