user0/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

the exampleis about drop, not (de)allocation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Ralf Jung 2019-10-19 10:14:10 +02:00
parent 868a77263a
commit 696cba6e25
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/liballoc/rc.rs
View file

@ -112,9 +112,9 @@
//!
//! // Despite dropping `gadget_owner`, we're still able to print out the name
//! // of the `Owner` of the `Gadget`s. This is because we've only dropped a
//! // single `Rc<Owner>`, not the `Owner` allocation it points to. As long as there are
//! // single `Rc<Owner>`, not the `Owner` it points to. As long as there are
//! // other `Rc<Owner>` pointing at the same `Owner` allocation, it will remain
//! // allocated. The field projection `gadget1.owner.name` works because
//! // live. The field projection `gadget1.owner.name` works because
//! // `Rc<Owner>` automatically dereferences to `Owner`.
//! println!("Gadget {} owned by {}", gadget1.id, gadget1.owner.name);
//! println!("Gadget {} owned by {}", gadget2.id, gadget2.owner.name);