Rollup merge of #52207 - RalfJung:unsafety-errors, r=estebank
improve error message shown for unsafe operations Add a short explanation saying why undefined behavior could arise. In particular, the error many people got for "creating a pointer to a packed field requires unsafe block" was not worded great -- it lead to people just adding the unsafe block without considering if what they are doing follows the rules. I am not sure if a "note" is the right thing, but that was the easiest thing to add... Inspired by @gnzlbg at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46043#issuecomment-381544673
This commit is contained in:
commit
7897ee4d42
23 changed files with 114 additions and 50 deletions
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
|
|||
error[E0133]: call to unsafe function requires unsafe function or block
|
||||
error[E0133]: call to unsafe function is unsafe and requires unsafe function or block
|
||||
--> $DIR/E0133.rs:14:5
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | f();
|
||||
| ^^^ call to unsafe function
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: consult the function's documentation for information on how to avoid undefined behavior
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to previous error
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue