Fix typo
Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <huyuumi.dev@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
156cb44ab0
commit
7ecd7cd582
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -161,12 +161,12 @@ Here is the tracking issue on for our [`?` macro feature][tracking].
|
|||
|
||||
## Experimental RFC (eRFC)
|
||||
|
||||
An eRFC is a variant of the RFC process used for complex features wherethe high-level need
|
||||
An eRFC is a variant of the RFC process used for complex features where the high-level need
|
||||
is clear, but the design space is too large to settle on a detailed specification upfront.
|
||||
Instead of providing a final design, an eRFC outlines a high-level strategy to authorize
|
||||
a period of active experimentation. This allows the team to implement the feature behind
|
||||
a feature gate and gather practical data, which then informs a subsequent formal RFC for stabilization.
|
||||
While this process was used for major features like coroutines ([see RFC2033][rfc2033]),
|
||||
While this process was used for major features like coroutines ([see RFC 2033][rfc2033]),
|
||||
the explicit "eRFC" label is rarely used today. The project now generally prefers approving a standard
|
||||
RFC for an initial version and iterating on it through the nightly channel before final stabilization.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue