Make missing_fragment_specifier an unconditional error

This was attempted in [1] then reverted in [2] because of fallout.
Recently, this was made an edition-dependent error in [3].

Make missing fragment specifiers an unconditional error again.

[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75516
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80210
[3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128006
This commit is contained in:
Trevor Gross 2024-07-30 23:04:23 -04:00
parent 208cb5da15
commit 841f7ce69a
23 changed files with 108 additions and 345 deletions

View file

@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ expand_meta_var_expr_unrecognized_var =
variable `{$key}` is not recognized in meta-variable expression
expand_missing_fragment_specifier = missing fragment specifier
.note = fragment specifiers must be specified in the 2024 edition
.note = fragment specifiers must be provided
.suggestion_add_fragspec = try adding a specifier here
.valid = {$valid}

View file

@ -112,9 +112,8 @@ use rustc_ast::{DUMMY_NODE_ID, NodeId};
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_errors::MultiSpan;
use rustc_lint_defs::BuiltinLintDiag;
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::{META_VARIABLE_MISUSE, MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER};
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::META_VARIABLE_MISUSE;
use rustc_session::parse::ParseSess;
use rustc_span::edition::Edition;
use rustc_span::{ErrorGuaranteed, MacroRulesNormalizedIdent, Span, kw};
use smallvec::SmallVec;
@ -266,23 +265,11 @@ fn check_binders(
// Similarly, this can only happen when checking a toplevel macro.
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, name, kind) => {
if kind.is_none() && node_id != DUMMY_NODE_ID {
// FIXME: Report this as a hard error eventually and remove equivalent errors from
// `parse_tt_inner` and `nameize`. Until then the error may be reported twice, once
// as a hard error and then once as a buffered lint.
if span.edition() >= Edition::Edition2024 {
psess.dcx().emit_err(errors::MissingFragmentSpecifier {
span,
add_span: span.shrink_to_hi(),
valid: VALID_FRAGMENT_NAMES_MSG,
});
} else {
psess.buffer_lint(
MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER,
span,
node_id,
BuiltinLintDiag::MissingFragmentSpecifier,
);
}
psess.dcx().emit_err(errors::MissingFragmentSpecifier {
span,
add_span: span.shrink_to_hi(),
valid: VALID_FRAGMENT_NAMES_MSG,
});
}
if !macros.is_empty() {
psess.dcx().span_bug(span, "unexpected MetaVarDecl in nested lhs");

View file

@ -533,8 +533,6 @@ lint_mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes_suggestion_implicit =
lint_mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes_suggestion_mixed =
one option is to remove the lifetime for references and use the anonymous lifetime for paths
lint_missing_fragment_specifier = missing fragment specifier
lint_missing_unsafe_on_extern = extern blocks should be unsafe
.suggestion = needs `unsafe` before the extern keyword

View file

@ -432,9 +432,6 @@ pub fn decorate_builtin_lint(
BuiltinLintDiag::CfgAttrNoAttributes => {
lints::CfgAttrNoAttributes.decorate_lint(diag);
}
BuiltinLintDiag::MissingFragmentSpecifier => {
lints::MissingFragmentSpecifier.decorate_lint(diag);
}
BuiltinLintDiag::MetaVariableStillRepeating(name) => {
lints::MetaVariableStillRepeating { name }.decorate_lint(diag);
}

View file

@ -619,6 +619,11 @@ fn register_builtins(store: &mut LintStore) {
"converted into hard error, \
see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558> for more information",
);
store.register_removed(
"missing_fragment_specifier",
"converted into hard error, \
see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107> for more information",
);
}
fn register_internals(store: &mut LintStore) {

View file

@ -2616,10 +2616,6 @@ pub(crate) struct DuplicateMacroAttribute;
#[diag(lint_cfg_attr_no_attributes)]
pub(crate) struct CfgAttrNoAttributes;
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(lint_missing_fragment_specifier)]
pub(crate) struct MissingFragmentSpecifier;
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(lint_metavariable_still_repeating)]
pub(crate) struct MetaVariableStillRepeating {

View file

@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ declare_lint_pass! {
MACRO_USE_EXTERN_CRATE,
META_VARIABLE_MISUSE,
MISSING_ABI,
MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER,
MISSING_UNSAFE_ON_EXTERN,
MUST_NOT_SUSPEND,
NAMED_ARGUMENTS_USED_POSITIONALLY,
@ -1417,51 +1416,6 @@ declare_lint! {
};
}
declare_lint! {
/// The `missing_fragment_specifier` lint is issued when an unused pattern in a
/// `macro_rules!` macro definition has a meta-variable (e.g. `$e`) that is not
/// followed by a fragment specifier (e.g. `:expr`).
///
/// This warning can always be fixed by removing the unused pattern in the
/// `macro_rules!` macro definition.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```rust,compile_fail,edition2021
/// macro_rules! foo {
/// () => {};
/// ($name) => { };
/// }
///
/// fn main() {
/// foo!();
/// }
/// ```
///
/// {{produces}}
///
/// ### Explanation
///
/// To fix this, remove the unused pattern from the `macro_rules!` macro definition:
///
/// ```rust
/// macro_rules! foo {
/// () => {};
/// }
/// fn main() {
/// foo!();
/// }
/// ```
pub MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER,
Deny,
"detects missing fragment specifiers in unused `macro_rules!` patterns",
@future_incompatible = FutureIncompatibleInfo {
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseError,
reference: "issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>",
report_in_deps: true,
};
}
declare_lint! {
/// The `late_bound_lifetime_arguments` lint detects generic lifetime
/// arguments in path segments with late bound lifetime parameters.

View file

@ -778,7 +778,6 @@ pub enum BuiltinLintDiag {
UnnameableTestItems,
DuplicateMacroAttribute,
CfgAttrNoAttributes,
MissingFragmentSpecifier,
MetaVariableStillRepeating(MacroRulesNormalizedIdent),
MetaVariableWrongOperator,
DuplicateMatcherBinding,