Merge #10440

10440: Fix Clippy warnings and replace some `if let`s with `match` r=Veykril a=arzg

I decided to try fixing a bunch of Clippy warnings. I am aware of this project’s opinion of Clippy (I have read both [rust-lang/clippy#5537](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5537) and [rust-analyzer/rowan#57 (comment)](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rowan/pull/57#discussion_r415676159)), so I totally understand if part of or the entirety of this PR is rejected. In particular, I can see how the semicolons and `if let` vs `match` commits provide comparatively little benefit when compared to the ensuing churn.

I tried to separate each kind of change into its own commit to make it easier to discard certain changes. I also only applied Clippy suggestions where I thought they provided a definite improvement to the code (apart from semicolons, which is IMO more of a formatting/consistency question than a linting question). In the end I accumulated a list of 28 Clippy lints I ignored entirely.

Sidenote: I should really have asked about this on Zulip before going through all 1,555 `if let`s in the codebase to decide which ones definitely look better as `match` :P

Co-authored-by: Aramis Razzaghipour <aramisnoah@gmail.com>

crates/ide_db/src/rename.rs

@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ pub fn source_edit_from_references(
 }
 
 fn source_edit_from_name(edit: &mut TextEditBuilder, name: &ast::Name, new_name: &str) -> bool {
-    if let Some(_) = ast::RecordPatField::for_field_name(name) {
+    if ast::RecordPatField::for_field_name(name).is_some() {
         if let Some(ident_pat) = name.syntax().parent().and_then(ast::IdentPat::cast) {
             cov_mark::hit!(rename_record_pat_field_name_split);
             // Foo { ref mut field } -> Foo { new_name: ref mut field }