rollup merge of #21052: nick29581/methods-ext

Allows modifiers to be used on methods, associated types, etc.

r? @sfackler
This commit is contained in:
Alex Crichton 2015-01-15 14:11:39 -08:00
commit 98d4d4997e
7 changed files with 419 additions and 121 deletions

View file

@ -73,6 +73,108 @@ impl<F> ItemModifier for F
}
}
#[derive(Show,Clone)]
pub enum Annotatable {
Item(P<ast::Item>),
TraitItem(ast::TraitItem),
ImplItem(ast::ImplItem),
}
impl Annotatable {
pub fn attrs(&self) -> &[ast::Attribute] {
match *self {
Annotatable::Item(ref i) => &i.attrs[],
Annotatable::TraitItem(ref i) => match *i {
ast::TraitItem::RequiredMethod(ref tm) => &tm.attrs[],
ast::TraitItem::ProvidedMethod(ref m) => &m.attrs[],
ast::TraitItem::TypeTraitItem(ref at) => &at.attrs[],
},
Annotatable::ImplItem(ref i) => match *i {
ast::ImplItem::MethodImplItem(ref m) => &m.attrs[],
ast::ImplItem::TypeImplItem(ref t) => &t.attrs[],
}
}
}
pub fn fold_attrs(self, attrs: Vec<ast::Attribute>) -> Annotatable {
match self {
Annotatable::Item(i) => Annotatable::Item(P(ast::Item {
attrs: attrs,
..(*i).clone()
})),
Annotatable::TraitItem(i) => match i {
ast::TraitItem::RequiredMethod(tm) => Annotatable::TraitItem(
ast::TraitItem::RequiredMethod(
ast::TypeMethod { attrs: attrs, ..tm })),
ast::TraitItem::ProvidedMethod(m) => Annotatable::TraitItem(
ast::TraitItem::ProvidedMethod(P(
ast::Method { attrs: attrs, ..(*m).clone() }))),
ast::TraitItem::TypeTraitItem(at) => Annotatable::TraitItem(
ast::TraitItem::TypeTraitItem(P(
ast::AssociatedType { attrs: attrs, ..(*at).clone() }))),
},
Annotatable::ImplItem(i) => match i {
ast::ImplItem::MethodImplItem(m) => Annotatable::ImplItem(
ast::ImplItem::MethodImplItem(P(
ast::Method { attrs: attrs, ..(*m).clone() }))),
ast::ImplItem::TypeImplItem(t) => Annotatable::ImplItem(
ast::ImplItem::TypeImplItem(P(
ast::Typedef { attrs: attrs, ..(*t).clone() }))),
}
}
}
pub fn expect_item(self) -> P<ast::Item> {
match self {
Annotatable::Item(i) => i,
_ => panic!("expected Item")
}
}
pub fn expect_trait_item(self) -> ast::TraitItem {
match self {
Annotatable::TraitItem(i) => i,
_ => panic!("expected Item")
}
}
pub fn expect_impl_item(self) -> ast::ImplItem {
match self {
Annotatable::ImplItem(i) => i,
_ => panic!("expected Item")
}
}
}
// A more flexible ItemModifier (ItemModifier should go away, eventually, FIXME).
// meta_item is the annotation, item is the item being modified, parent_item
// is the impl or trait item is declared in if item is part of such a thing.
// FIXME Decorators should follow the same pattern too.
pub trait MultiItemModifier {
fn expand(&self,
ecx: &mut ExtCtxt,
span: Span,
meta_item: &ast::MetaItem,
item: Annotatable)
-> Annotatable;
}
impl<F> MultiItemModifier for F
where F: Fn(&mut ExtCtxt,
Span,
&ast::MetaItem,
Annotatable) -> Annotatable
{
fn expand(&self,
ecx: &mut ExtCtxt,
span: Span,
meta_item: &ast::MetaItem,
item: Annotatable)
-> Annotatable {
(*self)(ecx, span, meta_item, item)
}
}
/// Represents a thing that maps token trees to Macro Results
pub trait TTMacroExpander {
fn expand<'cx>(&self,
@ -299,6 +401,10 @@ pub enum SyntaxExtension {
/// in-place.
Modifier(Box<ItemModifier + 'static>),
/// A syntax extension that is attached to an item and modifies it
/// in-place. More flexible version than Modifier.
MultiModifier(Box<MultiItemModifier + 'static>),
/// A normal, function-like syntax extension.
///
/// `bytes!` is a `NormalTT`.

View file

@ -395,81 +395,15 @@ pub fn expand_item(it: P<ast::Item>, fld: &mut MacroExpander)
-> SmallVector<P<ast::Item>> {
let it = expand_item_modifiers(it, fld);
let mut decorator_items = SmallVector::zero();
let mut new_attrs = Vec::new();
for attr in it.attrs.iter() {
let mname = attr.name();
match fld.cx.syntax_env.find(&intern(mname.get())) {
Some(rc) => match *rc {
Decorator(ref dec) => {
attr::mark_used(attr);
fld.cx.bt_push(ExpnInfo {
call_site: attr.span,
callee: NameAndSpan {
name: mname.get().to_string(),
format: MacroAttribute,
span: None
}
});
// we'd ideally decorator_items.push_all(expand_item(item, fld)),
// but that double-mut-borrows fld
let mut items: SmallVector<P<ast::Item>> = SmallVector::zero();
dec.expand(fld.cx, attr.span, &*attr.node.value, &*it,
box |&mut : item| items.push(item));
decorator_items.extend(items.into_iter()
.flat_map(|item| expand_item(item, fld).into_iter()));
fld.cx.bt_pop();
}
_ => new_attrs.push((*attr).clone()),
},
_ => new_attrs.push((*attr).clone()),
}
}
let mut new_items = match it.node {
ast::ItemMac(..) => expand_item_mac(it, fld),
ast::ItemMod(_) | ast::ItemForeignMod(_) => {
let valid_ident =
it.ident.name != parse::token::special_idents::invalid.name;
if valid_ident {
fld.cx.mod_push(it.ident);
}
let macro_use = contains_macro_use(fld, &new_attrs[]);
let result = with_exts_frame!(fld.cx.syntax_env,
macro_use,
noop_fold_item(it, fld));
if valid_ident {
fld.cx.mod_pop();
}
result
},
_ => {
let it = P(ast::Item {
attrs: new_attrs,
..(*it).clone()
});
noop_fold_item(it, fld)
}
};
new_items.push_all(decorator_items);
new_items
expand_annotatable(Annotatable::Item(it), fld)
.into_iter().map(|i| i.expect_item()).collect()
}
fn expand_item_modifiers(mut it: P<ast::Item>, fld: &mut MacroExpander)
-> P<ast::Item> {
// partition the attributes into ItemModifiers and others
let (modifiers, other_attrs): (Vec<_>, _) = it.attrs.iter().cloned().partition(|attr| {
match fld.cx.syntax_env.find(&intern(attr.name().get())) {
Some(rc) => match *rc { Modifier(_) => true, _ => false },
_ => false
}
});
let (modifiers, other_attrs) = modifiers(&it.attrs, fld);
// update the attrs, leave everything else alone. Is this mutation really a good idea?
it = P(ast::Item {
attrs: other_attrs,
@ -477,7 +411,8 @@ fn expand_item_modifiers(mut it: P<ast::Item>, fld: &mut MacroExpander)
});
if modifiers.is_empty() {
return it;
let it = expand_item_multi_modifier(Annotatable::Item(it), fld);
return it.expect_item();
}
for attr in modifiers.iter() {
@ -504,7 +439,12 @@ fn expand_item_modifiers(mut it: P<ast::Item>, fld: &mut MacroExpander)
}
}
// expansion may have added new ItemModifiers
// Expansion may have added new ItemModifiers.
// It is possible, that an item modifier could expand to a multi-modifier or
// vice versa. In this case we will expand all modifiers before multi-modifiers,
// which might give an odd ordering. However, I think it is unlikely that the
// two kinds will be mixed, and I old-style multi-modifiers should be deprecated
// anyway.
expand_item_modifiers(it, fld)
}
@ -1029,6 +969,196 @@ impl<'a> Folder for PatIdentRenamer<'a> {
}
}
fn expand_annotatable(a: Annotatable,
fld: &mut MacroExpander)
-> SmallVector<Annotatable> {
let a = expand_item_multi_modifier(a, fld);
let mut decorator_items = SmallVector::zero();
let mut new_attrs = Vec::new();
for attr in a.attrs().iter() {
let mname = attr.name();
match fld.cx.syntax_env.find(&intern(mname.get())) {
Some(rc) => match *rc {
Decorator(ref dec) => {
let it = match a {
Annotatable::Item(ref it) => it,
// ItemDecorators are only implemented for Items.
_ => break,
};
attr::mark_used(attr);
fld.cx.bt_push(ExpnInfo {
call_site: attr.span,
callee: NameAndSpan {
name: mname.get().to_string(),
format: MacroAttribute,
span: None
}
});
// we'd ideally decorator_items.push_all(expand_item(item, fld)),
// but that double-mut-borrows fld
let mut items: SmallVector<P<ast::Item>> = SmallVector::zero();
dec.expand(fld.cx, attr.span, &*attr.node.value, &**it,
box |&mut: item| items.push(item));
decorator_items.extend(items.into_iter()
.flat_map(|item| expand_item(item, fld).into_iter()));
fld.cx.bt_pop();
}
_ => new_attrs.push((*attr).clone()),
},
_ => new_attrs.push((*attr).clone()),
}
}
let mut new_items: SmallVector<Annotatable> = match a {
Annotatable::Item(it) => match it.node {
ast::ItemMac(..) => {
expand_item_mac(it, fld).into_iter().map(|i| Annotatable::Item(i)).collect()
}
ast::ItemMod(_) | ast::ItemForeignMod(_) => {
let valid_ident =
it.ident.name != parse::token::special_idents::invalid.name;
if valid_ident {
fld.cx.mod_push(it.ident);
}
let macro_use = contains_macro_use(fld, &new_attrs[]);
let result = with_exts_frame!(fld.cx.syntax_env,
macro_use,
noop_fold_item(it, fld));
if valid_ident {
fld.cx.mod_pop();
}
result.into_iter().map(|i| Annotatable::Item(i)).collect()
},
_ => {
let it = P(ast::Item {
attrs: new_attrs,
..(*it).clone()
});
noop_fold_item(it, fld).into_iter().map(|i| Annotatable::Item(i)).collect()
}
},
Annotatable::TraitItem(it) => match it {
ast::TraitItem::ProvidedMethod(m) => {
expand_method(m, fld).into_iter().map(|m|
Annotatable::TraitItem(ast::TraitItem::ProvidedMethod(m))).collect()
}
ast::TraitItem::RequiredMethod(m) => {
SmallVector::one(Annotatable::TraitItem(
ast::TraitItem::RequiredMethod(fld.fold_type_method(m))))
}
ast::TraitItem::TypeTraitItem(t) => {
SmallVector::one(Annotatable::TraitItem(
ast::TraitItem::TypeTraitItem(P(fld.fold_associated_type((*t).clone())))))
}
},
Annotatable::ImplItem(it) => match it {
ast::ImplItem::MethodImplItem(m) => {
expand_method(m, fld).into_iter().map(|m|
Annotatable::ImplItem(ast::ImplItem::MethodImplItem(m))).collect()
}
ast::ImplItem::TypeImplItem(t) => {
SmallVector::one(Annotatable::ImplItem(
ast::ImplItem::TypeImplItem(P(fld.fold_typedef((*t).clone())))))
}
}
};
new_items.push_all(decorator_items.into_iter().map(|i| Annotatable::Item(i)).collect());
new_items
}
fn expand_trait_item(i: ast::TraitItem,
fld: &mut MacroExpander)
-> SmallVector<ast::TraitItem> {
expand_annotatable(Annotatable::TraitItem(i), fld)
.into_iter().map(|i| i.expect_trait_item()).collect()
}
fn expand_impl_item(i: ast::ImplItem,
fld: &mut MacroExpander)
-> SmallVector<ast::ImplItem> {
expand_annotatable(Annotatable::ImplItem(i), fld)
.into_iter().map(|i| i.expect_impl_item()).collect()
}
// partition the attributes into ItemModifiers and others
fn modifiers(attrs: &Vec<ast::Attribute>,
fld: &MacroExpander)
-> (Vec<ast::Attribute>, Vec<ast::Attribute>) {
attrs.iter().cloned().partition(|attr| {
match fld.cx.syntax_env.find(&intern(attr.name().get())) {
Some(rc) => match *rc {
Modifier(_) => true,
_ => false
},
_ => false
}
})
}
// partition the attributes into MultiModifiers and others
fn multi_modifiers(attrs: &[ast::Attribute],
fld: &MacroExpander)
-> (Vec<ast::Attribute>, Vec<ast::Attribute>) {
attrs.iter().cloned().partition(|attr| {
match fld.cx.syntax_env.find(&intern(attr.name().get())) {
Some(rc) => match *rc {
MultiModifier(_) => true,
_ => false
},
_ => false
}
})
}
fn expand_item_multi_modifier(mut it: Annotatable,
fld: &mut MacroExpander)
-> Annotatable {
let (modifiers, other_attrs) = multi_modifiers(it.attrs(), fld);
// Update the attrs, leave everything else alone. Is this mutation really a good idea?
it = it.fold_attrs(other_attrs);
if modifiers.is_empty() {
return it
}
for attr in modifiers.iter() {
let mname = attr.name();
match fld.cx.syntax_env.find(&intern(mname.get())) {
Some(rc) => match *rc {
MultiModifier(ref mac) => {
attr::mark_used(attr);
fld.cx.bt_push(ExpnInfo {
call_site: attr.span,
callee: NameAndSpan {
name: mname.get().to_string(),
format: MacroAttribute,
span: None,
}
});
it = mac.expand(fld.cx, attr.span, &*attr.node.value, it);
fld.cx.bt_pop();
}
_ => unreachable!()
},
_ => unreachable!()
}
}
// Expansion may have added new ItemModifiers.
expand_item_multi_modifier(it, fld)
}
// expand a method
fn expand_method(m: P<ast::Method>, fld: &mut MacroExpander) -> SmallVector<P<ast::Method>> {
m.and_then(|m| match m.node {
@ -1042,7 +1172,7 @@ fn expand_method(m: P<ast::Method>, fld: &mut MacroExpander) -> SmallVector<P<as
vis) => {
let id = fld.new_id(m.id);
let (rewritten_fn_decl, rewritten_body)
= expand_and_rename_fn_decl_and_block(decl,body,fld);
= expand_and_rename_fn_decl_and_block(decl, body, fld);
SmallVector::one(P(ast::Method {
attrs: m.attrs.move_map(|a| fld.fold_attribute(a)),
id: id,
@ -1147,6 +1277,14 @@ impl<'a, 'b> Folder for MacroExpander<'a, 'b> {
expand_arm(arm, self)
}
fn fold_trait_item(&mut self, i: ast::TraitItem) -> SmallVector<ast::TraitItem> {
expand_trait_item(i, self)
}
fn fold_impl_item(&mut self, i: ast::ImplItem) -> SmallVector<ast::ImplItem> {
expand_impl_item(i, self)
}
fn fold_method(&mut self, method: P<ast::Method>) -> SmallVector<P<ast::Method>> {
expand_method(method, self)
}