diff --git a/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt b/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt index 745f00c4f527..7a787255da6d 100644 --- a/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt +++ b/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ run-make/interdependent-c-libraries/Makefile run-make/issue-107094/Makefile run-make/issue-14698/Makefile run-make/issue-15460/Makefile -run-make/issue-22131/Makefile run-make/issue-26006/Makefile run-make/issue-28595/Makefile run-make/issue-33329/Makefile diff --git a/tests/run-make/issue-22131/Makefile b/tests/run-make/issue-22131/Makefile deleted file mode 100644 index 4f33a4659cc1..000000000000 --- a/tests/run-make/issue-22131/Makefile +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -# ignore-cross-compile -include ../tools.mk - -all: foo.rs - $(RUSTC) --cfg 'feature="bar"' --crate-type lib foo.rs - $(RUSTDOC) --test --cfg 'feature="bar"' \ - -L $(TMPDIR) foo.rs |\ - $(CGREP) 'foo.rs - foo (line 1) ... ok' diff --git a/tests/run-make/issue-22131/foo.rs b/tests/run-make/rustdoc-cfgspec-parsing/foo.rs similarity index 100% rename from tests/run-make/issue-22131/foo.rs rename to tests/run-make/rustdoc-cfgspec-parsing/foo.rs diff --git a/tests/run-make/rustdoc-cfgspec-parsing/rmake.rs b/tests/run-make/rustdoc-cfgspec-parsing/rmake.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7cb66575c548 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/run-make/rustdoc-cfgspec-parsing/rmake.rs @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// A rustdoc bug caused the `feature=bar` syntax for the cfg flag to be interpreted +// wrongly, with `feature=bar` instead of just `bar` being understood as the feature name. +// After this was fixed in #22135, this test checks that this bug does not make a resurgence. +// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/22131 + +//FIXME(Oneirical): try test-various + +use run_make_support::{rustc, rustdoc}; + +fn main() { + rustc().cfg(r#"feature="bar""#).crate_type("lib").input("foo.rs").run(); + rustdoc() + .arg("--test") + .arg("--cfg") + .arg(r#"feature="bar""#) + .input("foo.rs") + .run() + .assert_stdout_contains("foo.rs - foo (line 1) ... ok"); +}