Rollup merge of #63667 - petrochenkov:deriveholders, r=matthewjasper

resolve: Properly integrate derives and `macro_rules` scopes

So,
```rust
#[derive(A, B)]
struct S;

m!();
```
turns into something like
```rust
struct S;

A_placeholder!( struct S; );

B_placeholder!( struct S; );

m!();
```
during expansion.

And for `m!()` its "`macro_rules` scope" (aka "legacy scope") should point to the `B_placeholder` call rather than to the derive container `#[derive(A, B)]`.

`fn build_reduced_graph` now makes sure the legacy scope points to the right thing.
(It's still a mystery for me why this worked before https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63535.)

Unfortunately, placeholders from derives are currently treated separately from placeholders from other macros and need to be passed as `extra_placeholders` rather than a part of the AST fragment.
That's fixable, but I wanted to keep this PR more minimal to close the regression faster.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63651
r? @matthewjasper

src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/gen-macro-rules.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// force-host
+// no-prefer-dynamic
+
+#![crate_type = "proc-macro"]
+
+extern crate proc_macro;
+use proc_macro::TokenStream;
+
+#[proc_macro_derive(repro)]
+pub fn proc_macro_hack_expr(_input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
+    "macro_rules! m {()=>{}}".parse().unwrap()
+}

src/test/ui/proc-macro/gen-macro-rules.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// Derive macros can generate `macro_rules` items, regression test for issue #63651.
+
+// check-pass
+// aux-build:gen-macro-rules.rs
+
+extern crate gen_macro_rules as repro;
+
+#[derive(repro::repro)]
+pub struct S;
+
+m!(); // OK
+
+fn main() {}