Turn tcx.vtable_allocation() into a query.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1e2c0f0ad
commit
b7cc99142a
9 changed files with 101 additions and 72 deletions
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
|
|||
// revisions:rpass1 rpass2
|
||||
|
||||
// This test case makes sure re-order the methods in a vtable will
|
||||
// trigger recompilation of codegen units that instantiate it.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89598
|
||||
|
||||
trait Foo {
|
||||
#[cfg(rpass1)]
|
||||
fn method1(&self) -> u32;
|
||||
|
|
@ -16,12 +21,21 @@ impl Foo for u32 {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
// Before #89598 was fixed, the vtable allocation would be cached during
|
||||
// a MIR optimization pass and then the codegen pass for the main object
|
||||
// file would not register a dependency on it (because of the missing
|
||||
// dep-tracking).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// In the rpass2 session, the main object file would not be re-compiled,
|
||||
// thus the mod1::foo(x) call would pass in an outdated vtable, while the
|
||||
// mod1 object would expect the new, re-ordered vtable, resulting in a
|
||||
// call to the wrong method.
|
||||
let x: &dyn Foo = &0u32;
|
||||
assert_eq!(mod1::foo(x), 17);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mod mod1 {
|
||||
pub fn foo(x: &dyn super::Foo) -> u32 {
|
||||
pub(super) fn foo(x: &dyn super::Foo) -> u32 {
|
||||
x.method1()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue