Rollup merge of #109259 - GuillaumeGomez:fix-missing-private-inlining, r=notriddle

rustdoc: Fix missing private inlining

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109258.

If the item isn't inlined, it shouldn't have been added into `view_item_stack`. The problem here was that it was not removed, preventing sub items to be inlined if they have a re-export in "upper levels".

cc `@epage`
r? `@notriddle`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2023-03-20 07:10:30 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit c07679989a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 31 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -265,10 +265,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> RustdocVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
return false;
}
if !self.view_item_stack.insert(res_did) {
return false;
}
if !please_inline &&
let mut visitor = OneLevelVisitor::new(self.cx.tcx.hir(), res_did) &&
let Some(item) = visitor.find_target(self.cx.tcx, def_id.to_def_id(), path) &&
@ -285,6 +281,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> RustdocVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
return false;
}
if !self.view_item_stack.insert(res_did) {
return false;
}
let ret = match tcx.hir().get_by_def_id(res_did) {
Node::Item(&hir::Item { kind: hir::ItemKind::Mod(ref m), .. }) if glob => {
let prev = mem::replace(&mut self.inlining, true);