Auto merge of #102535 - scottmcm:optimize-split-at-partition-point, r=thomcc

Tell LLVM that `partition_point` returns a valid fencepost

This was already done for a successful `binary_search`, but this way `partition_point` can get similar optimizations.

Demonstration that nightly can't do this optimization today, and leaves in the panicking path: <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=e1074cd2faf5f68e49cffd728ded243a>

r? `@thomcc`
This commit is contained in:
bors 2022-10-02 07:11:15 +00:00
commit c2590e6e89
2 changed files with 32 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -2426,15 +2426,20 @@ impl<T> [T] {
where
F: FnMut(&'a T) -> Ordering,
{
// INVARIANTS:
// - 0 <= left <= left + size = right <= self.len()
// - f returns Less for everything in self[..left]
// - f returns Greater for everything in self[right..]
let mut size = self.len();
let mut left = 0;
let mut right = size;
while left < right {
let mid = left + size / 2;
// SAFETY: the call is made safe by the following invariants:
// - `mid >= 0`
// - `mid < size`: `mid` is limited by `[left; right)` bound.
// SAFETY: the while condition means `size` is strictly positive, so
// `size/2 < size`. Thus `left + size/2 < left + size`, which
// coupled with the `left + size <= self.len()` invariant means
// we have `left + size/2 < self.len()`, and this is in-bounds.
let cmp = f(unsafe { self.get_unchecked(mid) });
// The reason why we use if/else control flow rather than match
@ -2452,6 +2457,10 @@ impl<T> [T] {
size = right - left;
}
// SAFETY: directly true from the overall invariant.
// Note that this is `<=`, unlike the assume in the `Ok` path.
unsafe { crate::intrinsics::assume(left <= self.len()) };
Err(left)
}

View file

@ -16,3 +16,23 @@ pub fn binary_search_index_no_bounds_check(s: &[u8]) -> u8 {
42
}
}
// Similarly, check that `partition_point` is known to return a valid fencepost.
// CHECK-LABEL: @unknown_split
#[no_mangle]
pub fn unknown_split(x: &[i32], i: usize) -> (&[i32], &[i32]) {
// This just makes sure that the subsequent function is looking for the
// absence of something that might actually be there.
// CHECK: call core::panicking::panic
x.split_at(i)
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @partition_point_split_no_bounds_check
#[no_mangle]
pub fn partition_point_split_no_bounds_check(x: &[i32], needle: i32) -> (&[i32], &[i32]) {
// CHECK-NOT: call core::panicking::panic
let i = x.partition_point(|p| p < &needle);
x.split_at(i)
}