Auto merge of #21806 - edwardw:new-range-impl, r=alexcrichton

The new `::ops::Range` has separated implementations for each of the
numeric types, while the old `::iter::Range` has one for type `Int`.
However, we do not take output bindings into account when selecting
traits. So it confuses `typeck` and makes the new range does not work as
good as the old one when it comes to type inference.

This patch implements `Iterator` for the new range for one type `Int`.
This limitation could be lifted, however, if we ever reconsider the
output types' role in type inference.

Closes #21595
Closes #21649
Closes #21672
This commit is contained in:
bors 2015-02-01 19:07:11 +00:00
commit c2bda2a5bb
3 changed files with 78 additions and 75 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
// Copyright 2015 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
// Make sure the type inference for the new range expression work as
// good as the old one. Check out issue #21672, #21595 and #21649 for
// more details.
fn main() {
let xs = (0..8).map(|i| i == 1u64).collect::<Vec<_>>();
assert_eq!(xs[1], true);
let xs = (0..8).map(|i| 1u64 == i).collect::<Vec<_>>();
assert_eq!(xs[1], true);
let xs: Vec<u8> = (0..10).collect();
assert_eq!(xs.len(), 10);
for x in 0..10 { x % 2; }
for x in 0..100 { x as f32; }
let array = [true, false];
for i in 0..1 { array[i]; }
}