Rollup merge of #95292 - BGR360:const-trait-specialize, r=lcnr

Allow specialized const trait impls.

Fixes #95186.
Fixes #95187.

I've done my best to create a comprehensive test suite for the interaction between `min_specialization` and `const_trait_impls`. I wouldn't be surprised if there are interesting cases I haven't tested, please let me know.

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/const-default-bound-non-const-specialized-bound.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+// Tests that trait bounds on specializing trait impls must be `~const` if the
+// same bound is present on the default impl and is `~const` there.
+
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+
+#[rustc_specialization_trait]
+trait Specialize {}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Foo {}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Bar {}
+
+// bgr360: I was only able to exercise the code path that raises the
+// "missing ~const qualifier" error by making this base impl non-const, even
+// though that doesn't really make sense to do. As seen below, if the base impl
+// is made const, rustc fails earlier with an overlapping impl failure.
+impl<T> Bar for T
+where
+    T: ~const Foo,
+{}
+
+impl<T> Bar for T
+where
+    T: Foo, //~ ERROR missing `~const` qualifier
+    T: Specialize,
+{}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Baz {}
+
+impl<T> const Baz for T
+where
+    T: ~const Foo,
+{}
+
+impl<T> const Baz for T //~ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `Baz`
+where
+    T: Foo,
+    T: Specialize,
+{}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/const-default-bound-non-const-specialized-bound.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+error: missing `~const` qualifier for specialization
+  --> $DIR/const-default-bound-non-const-specialized-bound.rs:28:8
+   |
+LL |     T: Foo,
+   |        ^^^
+
+error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Baz`
+  --> $DIR/const-default-bound-non-const-specialized-bound.rs:40:1
+   |
+LL | impl<T> const Baz for T
+   | ----------------------- first implementation here
+...
+LL | impl<T> const Baz for T
+   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation
+
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0119`.

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/const-default-const-specialized.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Tests that a const default trait impl can be specialized by another const
+// trait impl and that the specializing impl will be used during const-eval.
+
+// run-pass
+
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Value {
+    fn value() -> u32;
+}
+
+const fn get_value<T: ~const Value>() -> u32 {
+    T::value()
+}
+
+impl<T> const Value for T {
+    default fn value() -> u32 {
+        0
+    }
+}
+
+struct FortyTwo;
+
+impl const Value for FortyTwo {
+    fn value() -> u32 {
+        42
+    }
+}
+
+const ZERO: u32 = get_value::<()>();
+
+const FORTY_TWO: u32 = get_value::<FortyTwo>();
+
+fn main() {
+    assert_eq!(ZERO, 0);
+    assert_eq!(FORTY_TWO, 42);
+}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/const-default-impl-non-const-specialized-impl.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// Tests that specializing trait impls must be at least as const as the default impl.
+
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Value {
+    fn value() -> u32;
+}
+
+impl<T> const Value for T {
+    default fn value() -> u32 {
+        0
+    }
+}
+
+struct FortyTwo;
+
+impl Value for FortyTwo { //~ ERROR cannot specialize on const impl with non-const impl
+    fn value() -> u32 {
+        println!("You can't do that (constly)");
+        42
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/const-default-impl-non-const-specialized-impl.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+error: cannot specialize on const impl with non-const impl
+  --> $DIR/const-default-impl-non-const-specialized-impl.rs:19:1
+   |
+LL | impl Value for FortyTwo {
+   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/default-keyword.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// check-pass
+
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Foo {
+    fn foo();
+}
+
+impl const Foo for u32 {
+    default fn foo() {}
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/issue-95186-specialize-on-tilde-const.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// Tests that `~const` trait bounds can be used to specialize const trait impls.
+
+// check-pass
+
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+
+#[const_trait]
+#[rustc_specialization_trait]
+trait Specialize {}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Foo {}
+
+impl<T> const Foo for T {}
+
+impl<T> const Foo for T
+where
+    T: ~const Specialize,
+{}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Bar {}
+
+impl<T> const Bar for T
+where
+    T: ~const Foo,
+{}
+
+impl<T> const Bar for T
+where
+    T: ~const Foo,
+    T: ~const Specialize,
+{}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/issue-95187-same-trait-bound-different-constness.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// Tests that `T: ~const Foo` in a specializing impl is treated as equivalent to
+// `T: Foo` in the default impl for the purposes of specialization (i.e., it
+// does not think that the user is attempting to specialize on trait `Foo`).
+
+// check-pass
+
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+
+#[rustc_specialization_trait]
+trait Specialize {}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Foo {}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Bar {}
+
+impl<T> Bar for T
+where
+    T: Foo,
+{}
+
+impl<T> const Bar for T
+where
+    T: ~const Foo,
+    T: Specialize,
+{}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Baz {}
+
+impl<T> const Baz for T
+where
+    T: Foo,
+{}
+
+impl<T> const Baz for T
+where
+    T: ~const Foo,
+    T: Specialize,
+{}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specialization/non-const-default-const-specialized.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Tests that a non-const default impl can be specialized by a const trait impl,
+// but that the default impl cannot be used in a const context.
+
+// run-pass
+
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+#![feature(min_specialization)]
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Value {
+    fn value() -> u32;
+}
+
+const fn get_value<T: ~const Value>() -> u32 {
+    T::value()
+}
+
+impl<T> Value for T {
+    default fn value() -> u32 {
+        println!("You can't do that (constly)");
+        0
+    }
+}
+
+struct FortyTwo;
+
+impl const Value for FortyTwo {
+    fn value() -> u32 {
+        42
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    let zero = get_value::<()>();
+    assert_eq!(zero, 0);
+
+    const FORTY_TWO: u32 = get_value::<FortyTwo>();
+    assert_eq!(FORTY_TWO, 42);
+}

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specializing-constness.rs

@@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ impl<T: ~const Default> const A for T {
     }
 }
 
-impl<T: Default + Sup> A for T { //~ ERROR: cannot specialize
+impl<T: Default + Sup> A for T {
+//~^ ERROR: cannot specialize
+//~| ERROR: missing `~const` qualifier
     fn a() -> u32 {
         3
     }

src/test/ui/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/specializing-constness.stderr

@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
-error: cannot specialize on trait `Default`
+error: cannot specialize on const impl with non-const impl
+  --> $DIR/specializing-constness.rs:20:1
+   |
+LL | impl<T: Default + Sup> A for T {
+   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: missing `~const` qualifier for specialization
   --> $DIR/specializing-constness.rs:20:9
    |
 LL | impl<T: Default + Sup> A for T {
    |         ^^^^^^^
 
-error: aborting due to previous error
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors