Auto merge of #74059 - RalfJung:miri-uninit-validation, r=oli-obk
Miri value validation: fix handling of uninit memory Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1456 Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1467 r? @oli-obk
This commit is contained in:
commit
e1beee4992
6 changed files with 69 additions and 28 deletions
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ LL | / static FOO: (&Foo, &Bar) = unsafe {(
|
|||
LL | | Union { u8: &BAR }.foo,
|
||||
LL | | Union { u8: &BAR }.bar,
|
||||
LL | | )};
|
||||
| |___^ type validation failed: encountered 0x05 at .1.<deref>, but expected a valid enum tag
|
||||
| |___^ type validation failed: encountered 0x05 at .1.<deref>.<enum-tag>, but expected a valid enum tag
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
|
|||
--> $DIR/ub-enum.rs:24:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | const BAD_ENUM: Enum = unsafe { mem::transmute(1usize) };
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered 0x00000001, but expected a valid enum tag
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered 0x00000001 at .<enum-tag>, but expected a valid enum tag
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
|
|||
--> $DIR/ub-enum.rs:42:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | const BAD_ENUM2: Enum2 = unsafe { mem::transmute(0usize) };
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered 0x00000000, but expected a valid enum tag
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered 0x00000000 at .<enum-tag>, but expected a valid enum tag
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#[repr(C)]
|
||||
union DummyUnion {
|
||||
unit: (),
|
||||
u8: u8,
|
||||
bool: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,6 +31,8 @@ union Bar {
|
|||
// the value is not valid for bools
|
||||
const BAD_BOOL: bool = unsafe { DummyUnion { u8: 42 }.bool};
|
||||
//~^ ERROR it is undefined behavior to use this value
|
||||
const UNINIT_BOOL: bool = unsafe { DummyUnion { unit: () }.bool};
|
||||
//~^ ERROR it is undefined behavior to use this value
|
||||
|
||||
// The value is not valid for any union variant, but that's fine
|
||||
// unions are just a convenient way to transmute bits around
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,11 +1,19 @@
|
|||
error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
|
||||
--> $DIR/union-ub.rs:31:1
|
||||
--> $DIR/union-ub.rs:32:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | const BAD_BOOL: bool = unsafe { DummyUnion { u8: 42 }.bool};
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered 0x2a, but expected a boolean
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to previous error
|
||||
error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
|
||||
--> $DIR/union-ub.rs:34:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | const UNINIT_BOOL: bool = unsafe { DummyUnion { unit: () }.bool};
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered uninitialized bytes, but expected a boolean
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue