Merge commit '30448e8cf9' into clippyup
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec2c6155aa
commit
e6dc0efc00
114 changed files with 2970 additions and 653 deletions
234
clippy_lints/src/missing_fields_in_debug.rs
Normal file
234
clippy_lints/src/missing_fields_in_debug.rs
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
|
|||
use std::ops::ControlFlow;
|
||||
|
||||
use clippy_utils::{
|
||||
diagnostics::span_lint_and_then,
|
||||
is_path_lang_item, paths,
|
||||
ty::match_type,
|
||||
visitors::{for_each_expr, Visitable},
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_ast::LitKind;
|
||||
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::Block;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{
|
||||
def::{DefKind, Res},
|
||||
Expr, ImplItemKind, LangItem, Node,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{ExprKind, Impl, ItemKind, QPath, TyKind};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{ImplItem, Item, VariantData};
|
||||
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::TypeckResults;
|
||||
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
|
||||
use rustc_span::{sym, Span, Symbol};
|
||||
|
||||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||
/// ### What it does
|
||||
/// Checks for manual [`core::fmt::Debug`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/fmt/trait.Debug.html) implementations that do not use all fields.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||
/// A common mistake is to forget to update manual `Debug` implementations when adding a new field
|
||||
/// to a struct or a new variant to an enum.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// At the same time, it also acts as a style lint to suggest using [`core::fmt::DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/fmt/struct.DebugStruct.html#method.finish_non_exhaustive)
|
||||
/// for the times when the user intentionally wants to leave out certain fields (e.g. to hide implementation details).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Known problems
|
||||
/// This lint works based on the `DebugStruct` helper types provided by the `Formatter`,
|
||||
/// so this won't detect `Debug` impls that use the `write!` macro.
|
||||
/// Oftentimes there is more logic to a `Debug` impl if it uses `write!` macro, so it tries
|
||||
/// to be on the conservative side and not lint in those cases in an attempt to prevent false positives.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This lint also does not look through function calls, so calling a function does not consider fields
|
||||
/// used inside of that function as used by the `Debug` impl.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Lastly, it also ignores tuple structs as their `DebugTuple` formatter does not have a `finish_non_exhaustive`
|
||||
/// method, as well as enums because their exhaustiveness is already checked by the compiler when matching on the enum,
|
||||
/// making it much less likely to accidentally forget to update the `Debug` impl when adding a new variant.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Example
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
/// use std::fmt;
|
||||
/// struct Foo {
|
||||
/// data: String,
|
||||
/// // implementation detail
|
||||
/// hidden_data: i32
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// impl fmt::Debug for Foo {
|
||||
/// fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
|
||||
/// formatter
|
||||
/// .debug_struct("Foo")
|
||||
/// .field("data", &self.data)
|
||||
/// .finish()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
/// Use instead:
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
/// use std::fmt;
|
||||
/// struct Foo {
|
||||
/// data: String,
|
||||
/// // implementation detail
|
||||
/// hidden_data: i32
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// impl fmt::Debug for Foo {
|
||||
/// fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
|
||||
/// formatter
|
||||
/// .debug_struct("Foo")
|
||||
/// .field("data", &self.data)
|
||||
/// .finish_non_exhaustive()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
#[clippy::version = "1.70.0"]
|
||||
pub MISSING_FIELDS_IN_DEBUG,
|
||||
pedantic,
|
||||
"missing fields in manual `Debug` implementation"
|
||||
}
|
||||
declare_lint_pass!(MissingFieldsInDebug => [MISSING_FIELDS_IN_DEBUG]);
|
||||
|
||||
fn report_lints(cx: &LateContext<'_>, span: Span, span_notes: Vec<(Span, &'static str)>) {
|
||||
span_lint_and_then(
|
||||
cx,
|
||||
MISSING_FIELDS_IN_DEBUG,
|
||||
span,
|
||||
"manual `Debug` impl does not include all fields",
|
||||
|diag| {
|
||||
for (span, note) in span_notes {
|
||||
diag.span_note(span, note);
|
||||
}
|
||||
diag.help("consider including all fields in this `Debug` impl")
|
||||
.help("consider calling `.finish_non_exhaustive()` if you intend to ignore fields");
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Checks if we should lint in a block of code
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The way we check for this condition is by checking if there is
|
||||
/// a call to `Formatter::debug_struct` but no call to `.finish_non_exhaustive()`.
|
||||
fn should_lint<'tcx>(
|
||||
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
|
||||
typeck_results: &TypeckResults<'tcx>,
|
||||
block: impl Visitable<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
// Is there a call to `DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive`? Don't lint if there is.
|
||||
let mut has_finish_non_exhaustive = false;
|
||||
// Is there a call to `DebugStruct::debug_struct`? Do lint if there is.
|
||||
let mut has_debug_struct = false;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_expr(block, |expr| {
|
||||
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(path, recv, ..) = &expr.kind {
|
||||
let recv_ty = typeck_results.expr_ty(recv).peel_refs();
|
||||
|
||||
if path.ident.name == sym::debug_struct && match_type(cx, recv_ty, &paths::FORMATTER) {
|
||||
has_debug_struct = true;
|
||||
} else if path.ident.name == sym!(finish_non_exhaustive) && match_type(cx, recv_ty, &paths::DEBUG_STRUCT) {
|
||||
has_finish_non_exhaustive = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ControlFlow::<!, _>::Continue(())
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
!has_finish_non_exhaustive && has_debug_struct
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Checks if the given expression is a call to `DebugStruct::field`
|
||||
/// and the first argument to it is a string literal and if so, returns it
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Example: `.field("foo", ....)` returns `Some("foo")`
|
||||
fn as_field_call<'tcx>(
|
||||
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
|
||||
typeck_results: &TypeckResults<'tcx>,
|
||||
expr: &Expr<'_>,
|
||||
) -> Option<Symbol> {
|
||||
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(path, recv, [debug_field, _], _) = &expr.kind
|
||||
&& let recv_ty = typeck_results.expr_ty(recv).peel_refs()
|
||||
&& match_type(cx, recv_ty, &paths::DEBUG_STRUCT)
|
||||
&& path.ident.name == sym::field
|
||||
&& let ExprKind::Lit(lit) = &debug_field.kind
|
||||
&& let LitKind::Str(sym, ..) = lit.node
|
||||
{
|
||||
Some(sym)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Attempts to find unused fields assuming that the item is a struct
|
||||
fn check_struct<'tcx>(
|
||||
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
|
||||
typeck_results: &TypeckResults<'tcx>,
|
||||
block: &'tcx Block<'tcx>,
|
||||
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
item: &'tcx Item<'tcx>,
|
||||
data: &VariantData<'_>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
// Is there a "direct" field access anywhere (i.e. self.foo)?
|
||||
// We don't want to lint if there is not, because the user might have
|
||||
// a newtype struct and use fields from the wrapped type only.
|
||||
let mut has_direct_field_access = false;
|
||||
let mut field_accesses = FxHashSet::default();
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_expr(block, |expr| {
|
||||
if let ExprKind::Field(target, ident) = expr.kind
|
||||
&& let target_ty = typeck_results.expr_ty_adjusted(target).peel_refs()
|
||||
&& target_ty == self_ty
|
||||
{
|
||||
field_accesses.insert(ident.name);
|
||||
has_direct_field_access = true;
|
||||
} else if let Some(sym) = as_field_call(cx, typeck_results, expr) {
|
||||
field_accesses.insert(sym);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ControlFlow::<!, _>::Continue(())
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let span_notes = data
|
||||
.fields()
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|field| {
|
||||
if field_accesses.contains(&field.ident.name) || is_path_lang_item(cx, field.ty, LangItem::PhantomData) {
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Some((field.span, "this field is unused"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
// only lint if there's also at least one direct field access to allow patterns
|
||||
// where one might have a newtype struct and uses fields from the wrapped type
|
||||
if !span_notes.is_empty() && has_direct_field_access {
|
||||
report_lints(cx, item.span, span_notes);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for MissingFieldsInDebug {
|
||||
fn check_item(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, item: &'tcx rustc_hir::Item<'tcx>) {
|
||||
// is this an `impl Debug for X` block?
|
||||
if let ItemKind::Impl(Impl { of_trait: Some(trait_ref), self_ty, items, .. }) = item.kind
|
||||
&& let Res::Def(DefKind::Trait, trait_def_id) = trait_ref.path.res
|
||||
&& let TyKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, self_path)) = &self_ty.kind
|
||||
&& cx.match_def_path(trait_def_id, &[sym::core, sym::fmt, sym::Debug])
|
||||
// don't trigger if this impl was derived
|
||||
&& !cx.tcx.has_attr(item.owner_id, sym::automatically_derived)
|
||||
&& !item.span.from_expansion()
|
||||
// find `Debug::fmt` function
|
||||
&& let Some(fmt_item) = items.iter().find(|i| i.ident.name == sym::fmt)
|
||||
&& let ImplItem { kind: ImplItemKind::Fn(_, body_id), .. } = cx.tcx.hir().impl_item(fmt_item.id)
|
||||
&& let body = cx.tcx.hir().body(*body_id)
|
||||
&& let ExprKind::Block(block, _) = body.value.kind
|
||||
// inspect `self`
|
||||
&& let self_ty = cx.tcx.type_of(self_path.res.def_id()).skip_binder().peel_refs()
|
||||
&& let Some(self_adt) = self_ty.ty_adt_def()
|
||||
&& let Some(self_def_id) = self_adt.did().as_local()
|
||||
&& let Some(Node::Item(self_item)) = cx.tcx.hir().find_by_def_id(self_def_id)
|
||||
// NB: can't call cx.typeck_results() as we are not in a body
|
||||
&& let typeck_results = cx.tcx.typeck_body(*body_id)
|
||||
&& should_lint(cx, typeck_results, block)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// we intentionally only lint structs, see lint description
|
||||
if let ItemKind::Struct(data, _) = &self_item.kind {
|
||||
check_struct(cx, typeck_results, block, self_ty, item, data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue