From f244ed6a1a99d54eac8e703df252750eac5ef954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anatol Ulrich Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 04:46:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doxx --- crates/ide/src/rename.rs | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/crates/ide/src/rename.rs b/crates/ide/src/rename.rs index 51f6b5d133f1..bb23699cad4d 100644 --- a/crates/ide/src/rename.rs +++ b/crates/ide/src/rename.rs @@ -36,10 +36,11 @@ pub(crate) fn prepare_rename( let mut defs = find_definitions(&sema, syntax, position)?; // TODO: - // - is "No references found at position" the right error? (why does it not get caught by `find_definitions`... hmm) + // - `find_definitions` is implemented so that it returns a non-empty vec + // in the `Ok` case. But that's not expressed by the type signature, hence `unwrap()` + // here which ... wart. // - is "just take the first `name_like`" correct? If not, what do? - let (name_like, _def) = - defs.next().ok_or_else(|| format_err!("No references found at position"))?; + let (name_like, _def) = defs.next().unwrap(); let frange = sema.original_range(name_like.syntax()); always!(frange.range.contains_inclusive(position.offset) && frange.file_id == position.file_id); Ok(RangeInfo::new(frange.range, ())) @@ -168,7 +169,13 @@ fn find_definitions( match v { // remove duplicates // TODO is "unique by `Definition`" correct? - Ok(v) => Ok(v.into_iter().unique_by(|t| t.1)), + Ok(v) => { + if v.is_empty() { + Err(format_err!("No references found at position")) + } else { + Ok(v.into_iter().unique_by(|t| t.1)) + } + } Err(e) => Err(e), } }