Support unchecked blocks
This patch supports the syntax
unchecked {
...
}
to disable purity checking within a block. Presumably it will only be
used within a declared "pure fn". However, there is no checking that it
doesn't occur elsewhere, and it would be harmless for it to do so.
I went with Lindsey's suggestion for the syntax, but it's subject to
change.
This allows you to write code that uses predicates that call arbitrary
Rust functions, but you must declare your intentions by wrapping it in
an unchecked { ... } block. The test case run-pass/unchecked-predicates.rs
demonstrates how to do that.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9bc3cb10c
commit
f841e89443
8 changed files with 55 additions and 19 deletions
|
|
@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ fn parse_bottom_expr(p: &parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
|||
} else if p.peek() == token::BINOP(token::OR) {
|
||||
ret parse_fn_block_expr(p);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let blk = parse_block_tail(p, lo);
|
||||
let blk = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked);
|
||||
ret mk_expr(p, blk.span.lo, blk.span.hi, ast::expr_block(blk));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if eat_word(p, "if") {
|
||||
|
|
@ -860,6 +860,10 @@ fn parse_bottom_expr(p: &parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
|||
ret parse_fn_expr(p, ast::proto_block);
|
||||
} else if eat_word(p, "lambda") {
|
||||
ret parse_fn_expr(p, ast::proto_closure);
|
||||
} else if eat_word(p, "unchecked") {
|
||||
expect(p, token::LBRACE);
|
||||
let blk = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::unchecked);
|
||||
ret mk_expr(p, blk.span.lo, blk.span.hi, ast::expr_block(blk));
|
||||
} else if p.peek() == token::LBRACKET {
|
||||
p.bump();
|
||||
let mut = parse_mutability(p);
|
||||
|
|
@ -876,7 +880,7 @@ fn parse_bottom_expr(p: &parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
|||
ret mk_mac_expr(p, lo, p.get_hi_pos(), ast::mac_embed_type(ty))
|
||||
} else if p.peek() == token::POUND_LBRACE {
|
||||
p.bump();
|
||||
let blk = ast::mac_embed_block(parse_block_tail(p, lo));
|
||||
let blk = ast::mac_embed_block(parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked));
|
||||
ret mk_mac_expr(p, lo, p.get_hi_pos(), blk);
|
||||
} else if p.peek() == token::ELLIPSIS {
|
||||
p.bump();
|
||||
|
|
@ -1309,7 +1313,7 @@ fn parse_fn_expr(p: &parser, proto: ast::proto) -> @ast::expr {
|
|||
fn parse_fn_block_expr(p: &parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
||||
let lo = p.get_last_lo_pos();
|
||||
let decl = parse_fn_block_decl(p);
|
||||
let body = parse_block_tail(p, lo);
|
||||
let body = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked);
|
||||
let _fn = {decl: decl, proto: ast::proto_block, body: body};
|
||||
ret mk_expr(p, lo, body.span.hi, ast::expr_fn(_fn));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1664,12 +1668,20 @@ fn stmt_ends_with_semi(stmt: &ast::stmt) -> bool {
|
|||
|
||||
fn parse_block(p: &parser) -> ast::blk {
|
||||
let lo = p.get_lo_pos();
|
||||
expect(p, token::LBRACE);
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo);
|
||||
if eat_word(p, "unchecked") {
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::unchecked);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
expect(p, token::LBRACE);
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Precondition: already parsed the '{' or '#{'
|
||||
// I guess that also means "already parsed the 'impure'" if
|
||||
// necessary, and this should take a qualifier.
|
||||
// some blocks start with "#{"...
|
||||
fn parse_block_tail(p: &parser, lo: uint) -> ast::blk {
|
||||
fn parse_block_tail(p: &parser, lo: uint, s: ast::check_mode) -> ast::blk {
|
||||
let stmts: [@ast::stmt] = [];
|
||||
let expr: option::t<@ast::expr> = none;
|
||||
while p.peek() != token::RBRACE {
|
||||
|
|
@ -1710,7 +1722,7 @@ fn parse_block_tail(p: &parser, lo: uint) -> ast::blk {
|
|||
}
|
||||
let hi = p.get_hi_pos();
|
||||
p.bump();
|
||||
let bloc = {stmts: stmts, expr: expr, id: p.get_id()};
|
||||
let bloc = {stmts: stmts, expr: expr, id: p.get_id(), rules: s};
|
||||
ret spanned(lo, hi, bloc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue