match ergonomics for string and byte string literal patterns

This commit is contained in:
dianne 2025-04-15 22:09:10 -07:00
parent e5879018ef
commit fe98130e0f
8 changed files with 223 additions and 63 deletions

View file

@ -177,16 +177,20 @@ enum PeelKind {
/// Only peel reference types. This is used for explicit `deref!(_)` patterns, which dereference
/// any number of `&`/`&mut` references, plus a single smart pointer.
ExplicitDerefPat,
/// Implicitly peel any number of references, and if `deref_patterns` is enabled, smart pointer
/// ADTs. In order to peel only as much as necessary for the pattern to match, the `until_adt`
/// field contains the ADT def that the pattern is a constructor for, if applicable, so that we
/// don't peel it. See [`ResolvedPat`] for more information.
Implicit { until_adt: Option<DefId> },
/// Implicitly peel references, and if `deref_patterns` is enabled, smart pointer ADTs.
Implicit {
/// The ADT the pattern is a constructor for, if applicable, so that we don't peel it. See
/// [`ResolvedPat`] for more information.
until_adt: Option<DefId>,
/// The number of references at the head of the pattern's type, so we can leave that many
/// untouched. This is `1` for string literals, and `0` for most patterns.
pat_ref_layers: usize,
},
}
impl AdjustMode {
const fn peel_until_adt(opt_adt_def: Option<DefId>) -> AdjustMode {
AdjustMode::Peel { kind: PeelKind::Implicit { until_adt: opt_adt_def } }
AdjustMode::Peel { kind: PeelKind::Implicit { until_adt: opt_adt_def, pat_ref_layers: 0 } }
}
const fn peel_all() -> AdjustMode {
AdjustMode::peel_until_adt(None)
@ -488,9 +492,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
match pat.kind {
// Peel off a `&` or `&mut` from the scrutinee type. See the examples in
// `tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2005-default-binding-mode`.
_ if let AdjustMode::Peel { .. } = adjust_mode
_ if let AdjustMode::Peel { kind: peel_kind } = adjust_mode
&& pat.default_binding_modes
&& let ty::Ref(_, inner_ty, inner_mutability) = *expected.kind() =>
&& let ty::Ref(_, inner_ty, inner_mutability) = *expected.kind()
&& self.should_peel_ref(peel_kind, expected) =>
{
debug!("inspecting {:?}", expected);
@ -665,21 +670,32 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
// String and byte-string literals result in types `&str` and `&[u8]` respectively.
// All other literals result in non-reference types.
// As a result, we allow `if let 0 = &&0 {}` but not `if let "foo" = &&"foo" {}`.
//
// Call `resolve_vars_if_possible` here for inline const blocks.
PatKind::Expr(lt) => match self.resolve_vars_if_possible(self.check_pat_expr_unadjusted(lt)).kind() {
ty::Ref(..) => AdjustMode::Pass,
_ => {
// Path patterns have already been handled, and inline const blocks currently
// aren't possible to write, so any handling for them would be untested.
if cfg!(debug_assertions)
&& self.tcx.features().deref_patterns()
&& !matches!(lt.kind, PatExprKind::Lit { .. })
{
span_bug!(lt.span, "FIXME(deref_patterns): adjust mode unimplemented for {:?}", lt.kind);
// As a result, we allow `if let 0 = &&0 {}` but not `if let "foo" = &&"foo" {}` unless
// `deref_patterns` is enabled.
PatKind::Expr(lt) => {
// Path patterns have already been handled, and inline const blocks currently
// aren't possible to write, so any handling for them would be untested.
if cfg!(debug_assertions)
&& self.tcx.features().deref_patterns()
&& !matches!(lt.kind, PatExprKind::Lit { .. })
{
span_bug!(lt.span, "FIXME(deref_patterns): adjust mode unimplemented for {:?}", lt.kind);
}
// Call `resolve_vars_if_possible` here for inline const blocks.
let lit_ty = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(self.check_pat_expr_unadjusted(lt));
// If `deref_patterns` is enabled, allow `if let "foo" = &&"foo" {}`.
if self.tcx.features().deref_patterns() {
let mut peeled_ty = lit_ty;
let mut pat_ref_layers = 0;
while let ty::Ref(_, inner_ty, mutbl) = *peeled_ty.kind() {
// We rely on references at the head of constants being immutable.
debug_assert!(mutbl.is_not());
pat_ref_layers += 1;
peeled_ty = inner_ty;
}
AdjustMode::peel_all()
AdjustMode::Peel { kind: PeelKind::Implicit { until_adt: None, pat_ref_layers } }
} else {
if lit_ty.is_ref() { AdjustMode::Pass } else { AdjustMode::peel_all() }
}
},
@ -705,6 +721,35 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
/// Assuming `expected` is a reference type, determine whether to peel it before matching.
fn should_peel_ref(&self, peel_kind: PeelKind, mut expected: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
debug_assert!(expected.is_ref());
let pat_ref_layers = match peel_kind {
PeelKind::ExplicitDerefPat => 0,
PeelKind::Implicit { pat_ref_layers, .. } => pat_ref_layers,
};
// Most patterns don't have reference types, so we'll want to peel all references from the
// scrutinee before matching. To optimize for the common case, return early.
if pat_ref_layers == 0 {
return true;
}
debug_assert!(
self.tcx.features().deref_patterns(),
"Peeling for patterns with reference types is gated by `deref_patterns`."
);
// If the pattern has as many or more layers of reference as the expected type, we can match
// without peeling more, *unless* we find a smart pointer that we also need to peel.
// TODO: always peel `&mut`
let mut expected_ref_layers = 0;
while let ty::Ref(_, inner_ty, _) = *expected.kind() {
expected_ref_layers += 1;
expected = inner_ty;
}
pat_ref_layers < expected_ref_layers || self.should_peel_smart_pointer(peel_kind, expected)
}
/// Determine whether `expected` is a smart pointer type that should be peeled before matching.
fn should_peel_smart_pointer(&self, peel_kind: PeelKind, expected: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
// Explicit `deref!(_)` patterns match against smart pointers; don't peel in that case.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
//@ revisions: stable deref_patterns
//@[deref_patterns] check-pass
//! `deref_patterns` allows string and byte string literal patterns to implicitly peel references
//! and smart pointers from the scrutinee before matching. Since strings and byte strings themselves
//! have reference types, we need to make sure we don't peel too much. By leaving the type of the
//! match scrutinee partially uninferred, these tests make sure we only peel as much as needed in
//! order to match. In particular, when peeling isn't needed, the results should be the same was
//! we'd get without `deref_patterns` enabled.
#![cfg_attr(deref_patterns, feature(deref_patterns))]
#![cfg_attr(deref_patterns, expect(incomplete_features))]
fn uninferred<T>() -> T { unimplemented!() }
// Assert type equality without allowing coercions.
trait Is<T> {}
impl<T> Is<T> for T {}
fn has_type<T>(_: impl Is<T>) {}
fn main() {
// We don't need to peel anything to unify the type of `x` with `&str`, so `x: &str`.
let x = uninferred();
if let "..." = x {}
has_type::<&str>(x);
// We don't need to peel anything to unify the type of `&x` with `&[u8; 3]`, so `x: [u8; 3]`.
let x = uninferred();
if let b"..." = &x {}
has_type::<[u8; 3]>(x);
// Peeling a single `&` lets us unify the type of `&x` with `&[u8; 3]`, giving `x: [u8; 3]`.
let x = uninferred();
if let b"..." = &&x {}
//[stable]~^ ERROR: mismatched types
has_type::<[u8; 3]>(x);
// We have to peel both the `&` and the box before unifying the type of `x` with `&str`.
let x = uninferred();
if let "..." = &Box::new(x) {}
//[stable]~^ ERROR mismatched types
has_type::<&str>(x);
// After peeling the box, we can unify the type of `&x` with `&[u8; 3]`, giving `x: [u8; 3]`.
let x = uninferred();
if let b"..." = Box::new(&x) {}
//[stable]~^ ERROR mismatched types
has_type::<[u8; 3]>(x);
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/const-pats-do-not-mislead-inference.rs:33:12
|
LL | if let b"..." = &&x {}
| ^^^^^^ --- this expression has type `&&_`
| |
| expected `&&_`, found `&[u8; 3]`
|
= note: expected reference `&&_`
found reference `&'static [u8; 3]`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/const-pats-do-not-mislead-inference.rs:39:12
|
LL | if let "..." = &Box::new(x) {}
| ^^^^^ ------------ this expression has type `&Box<_>`
| |
| expected `&Box<_>`, found `&str`
|
= note: expected reference `&Box<_>`
found reference `&'static str`
help: consider dereferencing to access the inner value using the Deref trait
|
LL | if let "..." = &*Box::new(x) {}
| +
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/const-pats-do-not-mislead-inference.rs:45:12
|
LL | if let b"..." = Box::new(&x) {}
| ^^^^^^ ------------ this expression has type `Box<&_>`
| |
| expected `Box<&_>`, found `&[u8; 3]`
|
= note: expected struct `Box<&_>`
found reference `&'static [u8; 3]`
help: consider dereferencing to access the inner value using the Deref trait
|
LL | if let b"..." = *Box::new(&x) {}
| +
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.

View file

@ -29,4 +29,21 @@ fn main() {
//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
_ => {}
}
// `deref_patterns` allows string and byte string patterns to implicitly peel references.
match &"str" {
"str" => {}
//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
_ => {}
}
match &b"str" {
b"str" => {}
//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
_ => {}
}
match "str".to_owned() {
"str" => {}
//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
_ => {}
}
}

View file

@ -47,7 +47,37 @@ LL | match *(b"test" as &[u8]) {
LL | b"test" => {}
| ^^^^^^^ expected `[u8]`, found `&[u8; 4]`
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/needs-gate.rs:35:9
|
LL | match &"str" {
| ------ this expression has type `&&str`
LL | "str" => {}
| ^^^^^ expected `&&str`, found `&str`
|
= note: expected reference `&&_`
found reference `&'static _`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/needs-gate.rs:40:9
|
LL | match &b"str" {
| ------- this expression has type `&&[u8; 3]`
LL | b"str" => {}
| ^^^^^^ expected `&&[u8; 3]`, found `&[u8; 3]`
|
= note: expected reference `&&_`
found reference `&'static _`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/needs-gate.rs:45:9
|
LL | match "str".to_owned() {
| ---------------- this expression has type `String`
LL | "str" => {}
| ^^^^^ expected `String`, found `&str`
error: aborting due to 8 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0308, E0658.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.

View file

@ -14,10 +14,18 @@ fn main() {
};
assert_eq!(test_actual, test_expect);
// Test string literals in explicit `deref!(_)` patterns.
// Test string literals in deref patterns.
let test_actual = match test_in.to_string() {
deref!("zero") => 0,
deref!("one") => 1,
"one" => 1,
_ => 2,
};
assert_eq!(test_actual, test_expect);
// Test peeling references in addition to smart pointers.
let test_actual = match &test_in.to_string() {
deref!("zero") => 0,
"one" => 1,
_ => 2,
};
assert_eq!(test_actual, test_expect);
@ -47,18 +55,18 @@ fn main() {
};
assert_eq!(test_actual, test_expect);
// Test byte string literals used as arrays in explicit `deref!(_)` patterns.
// Test byte string literals used as arrays in deref patterns.
let test_actual = match Box::new(*test_in) {
deref!(b"0") => 0,
deref!(b"1") => 1,
b"1" => 1,
_ => 2,
};
assert_eq!(test_actual, test_expect);
// Test byte string literals used as slices in explicit `deref!(_)` patterns.
// Test byte string literals used as slices in deref patterns.
let test_actual = match test_in.to_vec() {
deref!(b"0") => 0,
deref!(b"1") => 1,
b"1" => 1,
_ => 2,
};
assert_eq!(test_actual, test_expect);

View file

@ -2,19 +2,6 @@
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
fn main() {
// FIXME(deref_patterns): fails to typecheck because string literal patterns don't peel
// references from the scrutinee.
match "foo".to_string() {
"foo" => {}
//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
_ => {}
}
match &"foo".to_string() {
"foo" => {}
//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
_ => {}
}
// Make sure we don't try implicitly dereferncing any ADT.
match Some(0) {
Ok(0) => {}

View file

@ -1,24 +1,5 @@
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/typeck_fail.rs:8:9
|
LL | match "foo".to_string() {
| ----------------- this expression has type `String`
LL | "foo" => {}
| ^^^^^ expected `String`, found `&str`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/typeck_fail.rs:13:9
|
LL | match &"foo".to_string() {
| ------------------ this expression has type `&String`
LL | "foo" => {}
| ^^^^^ expected `&String`, found `&str`
|
= note: expected reference `&String`
found reference `&'static str`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/typeck_fail.rs:20:9
--> $DIR/typeck_fail.rs:7:9
|
LL | match Some(0) {
| ------- this expression has type `Option<{integer}>`
@ -28,6 +9,6 @@ LL | Ok(0) => {}
= note: expected enum `Option<{integer}>`
found enum `Result<_, _>`
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.