Better handle when trying to iterate on a `Range` of a type that isn't `Step`
Mention when a trait bound corresponds to an unstable trait.
Mention `Range` when `Step` bound is unment, and explain that only some std types impl `Iterator` for `Range`.
CC rust-lang/rust#151026
Currently all core and std macros are automatically added to the prelude
via #[macro_use]. However a situation arose where we want to add a new macro
`assert_matches` but don't want to pull it into the standard prelude for
compatibility reasons. By explicitly exporting the macros found in the core and
std crates we get to decide on a per macro basis and can later add them via
the rust_20xx preludes.
This removes `associated_const_equality` as a separate feature gate and makes it part of `min_generic_const_args` (mgca).
Key changes:
- Remove `associated_const_equality` from unstable features, add to removed
- Update all test files to use `min_generic_const_args` instead
- Preserve the original "associated const equality is incomplete" error message by specially handling `sym::associated_const_equality` spans in `feature_gate.rs`
- Rename FIXME(associated_const_equality) to FIXME(mgca)
Warn on codegen attributes on required trait methods
This PR turns applying the following attributes on required trait methods (that is, trait methods **without** a default implementation) into a FCW:
- `#[cold]`
- `#[link_section]`
- `#[linkage]` (unstable)
- `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` (internal attribute)
These attributes already had no effect when applied to a required trait method, this PR only adds a warning.
Furthermore, it adds a comment in the code that the following codegen attributes are *inherited* when applied to a required trait method:
- `#[track_caller]`
- `#[align]` (unstable)
````@rustbot```` labels +I-lang-nominated
````@rust-lang/lang````
Two questions for the lang team:
- Is adding this warning ok?
- Does the current behaviour of these attributes align with that you would expect them to be?
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147432
Cleanup of attribute parsing errors
Removes the specific `UnknownMetaItem` and `IllFormedAttributeInputLint` errors.
Note that `IllFormedAttributeInputLint` is not a lint, contrary to its name
r? ``````@jdonszelmann``````
Externally implementable items
Supersedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140010
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125418
Getting started:
```rust
#![feature(eii)]
#[eii(eii1)]
pub fn decl1(x: u64)
// body optional (it's the default)
{
println!("default {x}");
}
// in another crate, maybe
#[eii1]
pub fn decl2(x: u64) {
println!("explicit {x}");
}
fn main() {
decl1(4);
}
```
- tiny perf regression, underlying issue makes multiple things in the compiler slow, not just EII, planning to solve those separately.
- No codegen_gcc support, they don't have bindings for weak symbols yet but could
- No windows support yet for weak definitions
This PR merges the implementation of EII for just llvm + not windows, doesn't yet contain like a new panic handler implementation or alloc handler. With this implementation, it would support implementing the panic handler in terms of EII already since it requires no default implementation so no weak symbols
The PR has been open in various forms for about a year now, but I feel that having some implementation merged to build upon
Port `doc` attributes to new attribute API
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229.
This PR ports the `doc` attributes to the new attribute API. However, there are things that will need to be fixed in a follow-up:
* Some part of `cfg_old.rs` are likely unused now, so they should be removed.
* Not all error/lints are emitted at the same time anymore, making them kinda less useful considering that you need to run and fix rustc/rustdoc multiple times to get through all of them.
* For coherency with the other attribute errors, I didn't modify the default output too much, meaning that we have some new messages now. I'll likely come back to that to check if the previous ones were better in a case-by-case approach.
* `doc(test(attr(...)))` is handled in a horrifying manner currently. Until we can handle it correctly with the `Attribute` system, it'll remain that thing we're all very ashamed of. 😈
* A type in rustdoc got its size increased, I'll check the impact on performance. But in any case, I plan to improve it in a follow-up so should be "ok".
* Because of error reporting, some fields of `Doc` are suboptimal, like `inline` which instead of being an `Option` is a `ThinVec` because we report the error later on. Part of the things I'm not super happy about but can be postponed to future me.
* In `src/librustdoc/clean/cfg.rs`, the `pub(crate) fn parse(cfg: &MetaItemInner) -> Result<Cfg, InvalidCfgError> {` function should be removed once `cfg_trace` has been ported to new `cfg` API.
* Size of type `DocFragment` went from 32 to 48. Would be nice to get it back to 32.
* ``malformed `doc` attribute input`` wasn't meant for so many candidates, should be improved.
* See how many of the checks in `check_attr` we can move to attribute parsing
* Port target checking to be in the attribute parser completely
* Fix target checking for `doc(alias)` on fields & patterns
And finally, once this PR is merged, I plan to finally stabilize `doc_cfg` feature. :)
cc `@jdonszelmann`
r? `@JonathanBrouwer`
148725 moved the default to being homogeneous; this adds heterogeneous ones back under an obvious-bikeshed syntax so people can experiment with that as well.
Essentially resolves 149025 by letting them move to this syntax instead.
Emit `check-cfg` lints during attribute parsing rather than evaluation
The goal of this PR is to make the `eval_config_entry` not have any side effects, by moving the check-cfg lints to the attribute parsing. This also helps ensure we do emit the lint in situations where the attribute happens to be parsed, but never evaluated.
cc ``@jdonszelmann`` ``@Urgau`` for a vibe check if you feel like it
Move the libgccjit.so file in a target directory
Since GCC is not multi-target, we need multiple libgccjit.so. Our solution to have a directory per target so that we can have multiple libgccjit.so.
r? `@Kobzol`
Fix ICE when applying test macro to crate root
This PR does a couple of things. First of all, I found [an ICE](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=a733a7f3d223e1a9712e44b571f3e5cf) that happens when applying `#![core::prelude::v1::test]` to the crate root. This is caused by the test macro not expanding to an item when `--test` isn't applied. For the crate root, that means it deletes the crate....
The fix now first does target checking, and only if the target is valid discards the item when `--test` isn't applied. The discarding is, I think, important for perf.
The problem with this PR is that it means that `#[test]` applied to structs previously would give no errors unless `--test` is applied! That sounds like a bug to me, but maybe we should crater run it just in case, since technically that's a breaking change. Errors in such items wouldn't be reported previously.
Also fixed a smol diagnostics bug with `#[bench]`'s error messages refering to `#[test]` accidentally.
r? noratrieb (since I already explained you a bunch, feel free to re-assign)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114920
Gate tests with the right edition
This PR guarantees that `./x test --test-args="--edition XXXX" ui` runs correctly with the 2015, 2018 and 2021 editions.
I don't expect this PR to hold up over time but it helps to submit further updates to the `//@ edition` directives of tests where we can use the new range syntax to have a more robust testing across different editions
r? `@fmease`
---
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: test-various
try-job: armhf-gnu
Port the `#![windows_subsystem]` attribute to the new attribute system
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229.
I think it's worth running the Windows test suite before merging that (I don't have the rights for this).
Add a diagnostic attribute for special casing const bound errors for non-const impls
Somewhat of a follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144194
My plan is to resolve
f4e19c6878/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/callee.rs (L907-913)
but doing so without being able to mark impls the way I do in this PR wrould cause all nice diagnostics about for loops and pointer comparisons to just be a `*const u32 does not implement [const] PartialEq` errors.
Stabilize `asm_cfg`
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140364
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140364
Reference PR:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/2063
# Request for Stabilization
## Summary
The `cfg_asm` feature allows `#[cfg(...)]` and `#[cfg_attr(...)]` on the arguments of the assembly macros, for instance:
```rust
asm!( // or global_asm! or naked_asm!
"nop",
#[cfg(target_feature = "sse2")]
"nop",
// ...
#[cfg(target_feature = "sse2")]
a = const 123, // only used on sse2
);
```
## Semantics
Templates, operands, `options` and `clobber_abi` in the assembly macros (`asm!`, `naked_asm!` and `global_asm!`) can be annotated with `#[cfg(...)]` and `#[cfg_attr(...)]`. When the condition evaluates to true, the annotated argument has no effect, and is completely ignored when expanding the assembly macro.
## Documentation
reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/2063
## Tests
- [tests/ui/asm/cfg.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/ui/asm/cfg.rs) checks that `cfg`'d arguments where the condition evaluates to false have no effect
- [tests/ui/asm/cfg-parse-error.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/ui/asm/cfg.rs) checks the parsing rules (parsing effectively assumes that the cfg conditions are all true)
## History
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140279
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140367
# Resolved questions
**how are other attributes handled**
Other attributes are parsed, but explicitly rejected.
# unresolved questions
**operand before template**
The current implementation expects at least one template string before any operands. In the example below, if the `cfg` condition evaluates to true, the assembly block is ill-formed. But even when it evaluates to `false` this block is rejected, because the parser still expects just a template (a template is parsed as an expression and then validated to ensure that it is or expands to a string literal).
Changing how this works is difficult.
```rust
// This is rejected because `a = out(reg) x` does not parse as an expresion.
asm!(
#[cfg(false)]
a = out(reg) x, //~ ERROR expected token: `,`
"",
);
```
**lint on positional arguments?**
Adding a lint to warn on the definition or use of positional arguments being `cfg`'d out was discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140279#issuecomment-2832237372 and subsequent comments. Such a lint is not currently implemented, but that may not be a blocker based on the comments there.
r? `@traviscross` (I'm assuming you'll reassign as needed)
