Variables that are collections of `CanonicalVarKind` are sometimes
called `var_kinds` and sometimes called `variables`. The former is much
better, because `variables` is (a) non-descript, and (b) often used
nearby for collections of `I::GenericArg`. I found the inconsistency
made the canonicalization code harder to understand.
This commit renames various `variables` things as `var_kinds`.
Sometimes we freshen using a new `TypeFreshener`, and sometimes we
freshen with an existing `TypeFreshener`. For the former we have the
method `InferCtxt::freshen`. For the latter we just call `fold_with`.
This asymmetry has been confusing to me.
This commit removes `InferCtxt::freshen` so that all the freshening
sites consistently use `fold_with` and it's obvious if each one is using
a new or existing `TypeFreshener`.
I have always found this confusingly named, because it creates a new
freshener rather than returning an existing one. We can remove it and
just use `TypeFreshener::new()` at the two call sites, avoiding this
confusion.
`freshen_{ty,const}` take a `Result` and just do a fold if the input is
`Ok`. It's simpler to do those folds at the call site, and only call
`freshen_{ty,const}` in the `Err` case. That way we can also avoid
useless fold operations on the results of `new_{int,uint,float}`.
Also, make some `bug!` calls more concise.
Do not emit solver errors that contain error types
any follow-up errors are going to either be duplicates or often disappear if the error itself is fixed.
in this PR it mostly silences dyn-compat errors as all the other errors are already deduplicated outside of the test suite. The dyn compat errors are independent errors and I think if the dyn compatiblity depended on an error type it would not actually show, so this is PR is actually silencing independent errors, too.
I am opening this PR because I am seeing lots of `{type error}: const Trait` errors when adding more const checking. So instead of targetting just those specific errors, I wanted to try out fully avoiding such errors near the trait solver.
cc ````@rust-lang/types```` for thoughts
remove outdated comment in (inner) `InferCtxt`
This comment seems to have stopped being relevant around 3 years ago after 9f95c605f8. A map? what map? :P
r? `@lcnr`
eagerly compute `sub_unification_table` again
Previously called `sub_relations`. We still only using them for diagnostics right now. This mostly reverts rust-lang/rust#119989. Necessary for type inference guidance due to not-yet defined opaque types, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/182.
We could use them for cycle detection in generalization and it seems desirable to do so in the future. However, this is unsound with the old trait solver as its cache does not track these `sub_unification_table` in any way.
We now properly track the `sub_unification_table` when canonicalizing so using them in the new solver is totally sound and the performance impact is far more manageable than I thought back in rust-lang/rust#119989.
r? `@compiler-errors`
This was done in #145740 and #145947. It is causing problems for people
using r-a on anything that uses the rustc-dev rustup package, e.g. Miri,
clippy.
This repository has lots of submodules and subtrees and various
different projects are carved out of pieces of it. It seems like
`[workspace.dependencies]` will just be more trouble than it's worth.
`-Znext-solver`: support non-defining uses in closures
Cleaned up version of rust-lang/rust#139587, finishing the implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/129. This does not affect stable. The reasoning for why this is the case is subtle however.
## What does it do
We split `do_mir_borrowck` into `borrowck_collect_region_constraints` and `borrowck_check_region_constraints`, where `borrowck_collect_region_constraints` returns an enormous `CollectRegionConstraintsResult` struct which contains all the relevant data to actually handle opaque type uses and to check the region constraints later on.
`query mir_borrowck` now simply calls `BorrowCheckRootCtxt::do_mir_borrowck` which starts by iterating over all nested bodies of the current function - visiting nested bodies before their parents - and computing their `CollectRegionConstraintsResult`.
After we've collected all constraints it's time to actually compute the concrete types for the opaques defined by this function. With this PR we now compute the concrete types of opaques for each body before using them to check the non-defining uses of any of them.
After we've computed the concrete types by using all bodies, we use `apply_computed_concrete_opaque_types` for each body to constrain non-defining uses, before finally finishing with `borrowck_check_region_constraints`. We always visit nested bodies before their parents when doing this.
## `ClosureRegionRequirements`
As we only call `borrowck_collect_region_constraints` for nested bodies before type checking the parent, we can't simply use the final `ClosureRegionRequirements` of the nested body during MIR type check. We instead track that we need to apply these requirements in `deferred_closure_requirements`.
We now manually apply the final closure requirements to each body after handling opaque types.
This works, except that we may need the region constraints of nested bodies to successfully define an opaque type in the parent. This is handled by using a new `fn compute_closure_requirements_modulo_opaques` which duplicates region checking - while ignoring any errors - before we've added the constraints from `apply_computed_concrete_opaque_types`. This is necessary for a lot of async tests, as pretty much the entire function is inside of an async block while the opaque type gets defined in the parent.
As an performance optimization we only use `fn compute_closure_requirements_modulo_opaques` in case the nested body actually depends on any opaque types. Otherwise we eagerly call `borrowck_check_region_constraints` and apply the final closure region requirements right away.
## Impact on stable code
Handling the opaque type uses in the parent function now only uses the closure requirements *modulo opaques*, while it previously also considered member constraints from nested bodies. `External` regions are never valid choice regions. Also, member constraints will never constrain a member region if it is required to be outlived by an external region, as that fails the upper-bound check. 564ee21912/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/opaque_types/member_constraints.rs (L90-L96)
Member constraints therefore never add constraints for external regions :>
r? `@BoxyUwU`
