When encountering a call to `iter` that should have been `into_iter` and vice-versa, provide a structured suggestion:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<IntoIter<{integer}, 3> as IntoIterator>::Item == &{integer}`
--> $DIR/into_iter-when-iter-was-intended.rs:5:37
|
LL | let _a = [0, 1, 2].iter().chain([3, 4, 5].into_iter());
| ----- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `&{integer}`, found integer
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
note: the method call chain might not have had the expected associated types
--> $DIR/into_iter-when-iter-was-intended.rs:5:47
|
LL | let _a = [0, 1, 2].iter().chain([3, 4, 5].into_iter());
| --------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ `IntoIterator::Item` is `{integer}` here
| |
| this expression has type `[{integer}; 3]`
note: required by a bound in `std::iter::Iterator::chain`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/iter/traits/iterator.rs:LL:COL
help: consider not consuming the `[{integer}, 3]` to construct the `Iterator`
|
LL - let _a = [0, 1, 2].iter().chain([3, 4, 5].into_iter());
LL + let _a = [0, 1, 2].iter().chain([3, 4, 5].iter());
|
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/macro-span-caller-replacement.rs:5:17
|
LL | s = format!("{arg}");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `&str`, found `String`
...
LL | macro_with_format!();
| -------------------- in this macro invocation
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `format` which comes from the expansion of the macro `macro_with_format` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
Assume the returned value in `.filter(…).count()`
Similar to how this helps in `slice::Iter::position`, LLVM sometimes loses track of how high this can get, so for `TrustedLen` iterators tell it what the upper bound is.
There is a weak convention in the ecosystem that `IterFoos` is an
iterator yielding items of type `Foo` (e.g. `bitflags` `IterNames`,
`hashbrown` `IterBuckets`), while `FooIter` is an iterator over `Foo`
from an `.iter()` or `.into_iter()` method (e.g. `memchr` `OneIter`,
`regex` `SetMatchesIter`). Rename `IterRange`, `IterRangeInclusive`, and
`IterRangeFrom` to `RangeIter`, `RangeInclusiveIter`, and
`RangeInclusiveIter` to match this.
Tracking issue: RUST-125687 (`new_range_api`)
Similar to how this helps in `slice::Iter::position`, LLVM sometimes loses track of how high this can get, so for `TrustedLen` iterators tell it what the upper bound is.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `[[u16; 3]; 2]: Bar` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-67185-2.rs:21:6
|
LL | impl Foo for FooImpl {}
| ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `[[u16; 3]; 2]`
|
help: the following other types implement trait `Bar`
--> $DIR/issue-67185-2.rs:9:1
|
LL | impl Bar for [u16; 4] {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `[u16; 4]`
LL | impl Bar for [[u16; 3]; 3] {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `[[u16; 3]; 3]`
note: required by a bound in `Foo`
--> $DIR/issue-67185-2.rs:14:30
|
LL | trait Foo
| --- required by a bound in this trait
LL | where
LL | [<u8 as Baz>::Quaks; 2]: Bar,
| ^^^ required by this bound in `Foo`
```
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `u32: Trait` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/trait_objects_fail.rs:26:9
|
LL | foo(&10_u32);
| ^^^^^^^ the trait `Trait` is not implemented for `u32`
|
help: the trait `Trait<12>` is not implemented for `u32`
but trait `Trait<2>` is implemented for it
--> $DIR/trait_objects_fail.rs:7:1
|
LL | impl Trait<2> for u32 {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: required for the cast from `&u32` to `&dyn Trait`
```
Pointing at the `impl` definition that *could* apply given a different self type is particularly useful when it has a blanket self type, as it might not be obvious and is not trivially greppable:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `RawImpl<_>: Raw<_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:4:5
|
LL | WrongImpl::foo(0i32);
| ^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
|
help: the trait `Raw<_>` is not implemented for `RawImpl<_>`
but trait `Raw<[_]>` is implemented for it
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:29:1
|
LL | impl<T> Raw<[T]> for RawImpl<T> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: required by a bound in `SafeImpl`
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:33:35
|
LL | pub struct SafeImpl<T: ?Sized, A: Raw<T>>(PhantomData<(A, T)>);
| ^^^^^^ required by this bound in `SafeImpl`
```
Rehome 32 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/`
rust-lang/rust#143902 divided into smaller, easier to review chunks.
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that `@Kivooeo` was using.
r? `@jieyouxu`
`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [4/N]
Some `tests/ui/issues/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/issues/`. Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? ````````@jieyouxu````````
Rehome 33 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/`
rust-lang/rust#143902 divided into smaller, easier to review chunks.
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that ``@Kivooeo`` was using.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
Rehome 21 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/`
rust-lang/rust#143902 divided into smaller, easier to review chunks.
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that ``@Kivooeo`` was using.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [2/N]
Some `tests/ui/issues/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/issues/`. Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
This adds an `iter!` macro that can be used to create movable
generators.
This also adds a yield_expr feature so the `yield` keyword can be used
within iter! macro bodies. This was needed because several unstable
features each need `yield` expressions, so this allows us to stabilize
them separately from any individual feature.
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
Co-authored-by: Jieyou Xu <jieyouxu@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
While working on #122661, some of these started triggering our "unnecessary parens" lints due to a change in the `assert!` desugaring. A cursory search identified a few more. Some of these have been carried from before 1.0, were a bulk rename from the previous name of `assert!` left them in that state. I went and removed as many of these unnecessary parens as possible in order to have fewer annoyances in the future if we make the lint smarter.
When a trait is not implemented for a type, but there *is* an `impl`
for another type or different trait params, we format the output to
use highlighting in the same way that E0308 does for types.
The logic accounts for 3 cases:
- When both the type and trait in the expected predicate and the candidate are different
- When only the types are different
- When only the trait generic params are different
For each case, we use slightly different formatting and wording.
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
