illumos' `ld` does not support a flag like either SHF_GNU_RETAIN or
SHF_SUNW_NODISCARD, so there is no way to communicate `#[used(linker)]`
for that target. Setting `USED_LINKER` to try results in LLVM setting
SHF_SUNW_NODISCARD for Solaris-like targets, which is an unknown section
header flag for illumos `ld` and prevents sections from being merged
that otherwise would.
As a motivating example, the `inventory` crate produces
`#[used]` items to merge into `.init_array`. Because those items have an
unknown section header flag they are not merged with the default
`.init_array` with `frame_dummy`, and end up never executed.
Downgrading `#[used]` to `#[used(compiler)]` on illumos keeps
so-attributed items as preserved as they had been before
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140872. As was the case before
that change, because rustc passes `-z ignore` to illumos `ld`, it's
possible that `used` sections are GC'd at link time.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146169 describes this
unfortunate circumstance.
Couple of codegen_fn_attrs improvements
As noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144678#discussion_r2245060329 here is no need to keep link_name and export_name separate, which the third commit fixes by merging them. The second commit removes some dead code and the first commit merges two ifs with equivalent conditions. The last commit is an unrelated change which removes an unused `feature(autodiff)`.
This removes the #[no_sanitize] attribute, which was behind an unstable
feature named no_sanitize. Instead, we introduce the sanitize attribute
which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off).
This also makes sanitize(kernel_address = ..) attribute work with
-Zsanitize=address
To do it the same as how clang disables address sanitizer, we now
disable ASAN on sanitize(kernel_address = "off") and KASAN on
sanitize(address = "off").
The same was added to clang in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44981.
This change implements the #[sanitize(..)] attribute, which opts to
replace the currently unstable #[no_sanitize]. Essentially the new
attribute works similar as #[no_sanitize], just with more flexible
options regarding where it is applied. E.g. it is possible to turn
a certain sanitizer either on or off:
`#[sanitize(address = "on|off")]`
This attribute now also applies to more places, e.g. it is possible
to turn off a sanitizer for an entire module or impl block:
```rust
\#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
\#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
This attribute is enabled behind the unstable `sanitize` feature.
Certain LLVM intrinsics, such as `llvm.wasm.throw`, can unwind. Marking
them as nounwind causes us to skip cleanup of locals and optimize out
`catch_unwind` under inlining or when `llvm.wasm.throw` is used directly
by user code.
The motivation for forcibly marking llvm.* as nounwind is no longer
present: most intrinsics are linked as `extern "C"` or other
non-unwinding ABIs, so we won't codegen `invoke` for them anyway.
inherit `#[align]` from trait method prototypes
````@workingjubilee```` this seems straightforward enough. Now that we're planning to make `-Cmin-function-alignment` a target modifier, I don't think there are any cross-crate complications here?
````@Jules-Bertholet```` is this the behavior you had in mind? In particular the inheritance of the attribute of a default impl is maybe a bit unintuitive at first? (but I think it's ok if that behavior is explicitly documented).
r? ghost
fix `-Zmin-function-alignment` on functions without attributes
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142854
The minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes (because the logic was in a loop that only runs if there is at least one attribute). The underlying reason we didn't catch this before is that in our testing we generally apply `#[no_mangle]` to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes.
r? `@workingjubilee`
the minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes. That is because in our testing we generally apply `#[no_mangle]` to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes
