```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `u32: Trait` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/trait_objects_fail.rs:26:9
|
LL | foo(&10_u32);
| ^^^^^^^ the trait `Trait` is not implemented for `u32`
|
help: the trait `Trait<12>` is not implemented for `u32`
but trait `Trait<2>` is implemented for it
--> $DIR/trait_objects_fail.rs:7:1
|
LL | impl Trait<2> for u32 {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: required for the cast from `&u32` to `&dyn Trait`
```
Pointing at the `impl` definition that *could* apply given a different self type is particularly useful when it has a blanket self type, as it might not be obvious and is not trivially greppable:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `RawImpl<_>: Raw<_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:4:5
|
LL | WrongImpl::foo(0i32);
| ^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
|
help: the trait `Raw<_>` is not implemented for `RawImpl<_>`
but trait `Raw<[_]>` is implemented for it
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:29:1
|
LL | impl<T> Raw<[T]> for RawImpl<T> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: required by a bound in `SafeImpl`
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:33:35
|
LL | pub struct SafeImpl<T: ?Sized, A: Raw<T>>(PhantomData<(A, T)>);
| ^^^^^^ required by this bound in `SafeImpl`
```
When encountering an unmet trait bound, point at local type that doesn't implement the trait:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar<T>: Foo` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-64855.rs:9:19
|
LL | pub struct Bar<T>(<Self as Foo>::Type) where Self: ;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
|
help: the trait `Foo` is not implemented for `Bar<T>`
--> $DIR/issue-64855.rs:9:1
|
LL | pub struct Bar<T>(<Self as Foo>::Type) where Self: ;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
In order to expose edition dependent divergences in some tests in the test suite, add explicit `edition` annotations. Some of these tests might require additional work to *avoid* the divergences, as they might have been unintentional. These are not exhaustive changes, purely opportunistic while looking at something else.
When a trait is not implemented for a type, but there *is* an `impl`
for another type or different trait params, we format the output to
use highlighting in the same way that E0308 does for types.
The logic accounts for 3 cases:
- When both the type and trait in the expected predicate and the candidate are different
- When only the types are different
- When only the trait generic params are different
For each case, we use slightly different formatting and wording.
stricter hidden type wf-check [based on #115008]
Original work by `@aliemjay` in #115008. A huge thanks to them for originally figuring out this approach ❤️
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114728
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114572
Instead of adding the `WellFormed` obligations when relating opaque types, we now always emit such an obligation when defining the hidden type.
This causes nested opaque types which aren't wf to error, see the comment below for the described impact. I believe this change to be desirable as it significantly reduces complexity by removing special-cases.
It also caused an issue with RPITIT: in defaulted trait methods, we add a `Projection(synthetic_assoc, rpit_of_trait_method)` clause to the `param_env`. This clause is not added to the `ParamEnv` of the nested coroutines. This caused a normalization failure in `fn check_coroutine_obligations` with the new solver. I fixed that by using the env of the typeck root instead.
r? `@oli-obk`
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that
tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root
obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for
the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the
most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't
implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type
from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid
talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about
`T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in
`tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs
to change).
Without doing so we use the same candidate cache entry
for `?0: Trait<?1>` and `?0: Trait<?0>`. These goals are different
and we must not use the same entry for them.
we don't track them when canonicalizing or when freshening,
resulting in instable caching in the old solver, and issues when
instantiating query responses in the new one.
Silence some follow-up errors [3/x]
this is one piece of the requested cleanups from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117449
Keep error types around, even in obligations.
These help silence follow-up errors, as we now figure out that some types (most notably inference variables) are equal to an error type.
But it also allows figuring out more types in the presence of errors, possibly causing more errors.
Errors in `DiagCtxtInner::emit_diagnostic` are never set to
`Level::Bug`, because the condition never succeeds, because
`self.treat_err_as_bug()` is called *before* the error counts are
incremented.
This commit switches to `self.treat_next_err_as_bug()`, fixing the
problem. This changes the error message output to actually say "internal
compiler error".
