Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103709 (ci: Upgrade dist-x86_64-netbsd to NetBSD 9.0)
- #103744 (Upgrade cc for working is_flag_supported on cross-compiles)
- #104105 (llvm: dwo only emitted when object code emitted)
- #104158 (Return .efi extension for EFI executable)
- #104181 (Add a few known-bug tests)
- #104266 (Regression test for coercion of mut-ref to dyn-star)
- #104300 (Document `Path::parent` behavior around relative paths)
- #104304 (Enable profiler in dist-s390x-linux)
- #104362 (Add `delay_span_bug` to `AttrWrapper::take_for_recovery`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make all download functions need only Config, not Builder
This also adds a new `mod download` instead of scattering the download code across `config.rs` and `native.rs`.
This is the simplest and also most bit-rotty part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102282. Opening it earlier so it's not mixed in with behavior changes and to avoid rebase hell.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94829 (which nows has the hackmd linked).
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Enable profiler in dist-s390x-linux
Build the profiler runtime to allow using -C profile-generate and -C instrument-coverage on s390x-linux.
I've verified in a local build that the runtime builds and the profiler is working fine on the platform.
Add a few known-bug tests
The labels of these tests should be changed from `S-bug-has-mcve` to `S-bug-has-test` once this is merged.
cc:
#101518#99492#90950#89196#104034#101350#103705#103899
I couldn't reproduce the failures in #101962 and #100772 (so either these have started passing, or I didn't repro properly), so leaving those out for now.
#102065 was a bit more complicated, since it uses `rustc_private` and I didn't want to mess with that.
llvm: dwo only emitted when object code emitted
Fixes#103932.
`CompiledModule` should not think a DWARF object was emitted when a bitcode-only compilation has happened, this can confuse archive file creation (which expects to create an archive containing non-existent dwo files).
r? ``````@michaelwoerister``````
ci: Upgrade dist-x86_64-netbsd to NetBSD 9.0
This is another step in toolchain upgrades for LLVM 16, which will need at least GCC 7.1.
Our previous NetBSD 8.0 cross-toolchain used its system GCC 5.5. While there are newer versions available in pkgsrc, I could not get those working for cross-compilation. Upgrading to NetBSD 9.0 gets us GCC 7.4, which is sufficient for now.
This will affect the compatibility of the build we ship for `x86_64-unknown-netbsd`, but others may still build their own from source if that is needed. It is expected that NetBSD 8 will reach EOL soon anyway, approximately one month after 10 is released, but there is no firm date for that.
Change the way libunwind is linked for *-windows-gnullvm targets
I have no idea why previous way works for `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` (assuming it actually works...) but not for `gnullvm`. It fails when linking libtest during Rust build (unless somebody adds `RUSTFLAGS='-Clinkarg=-lunwind'`).
Also fixes exception handling on AArch64.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103996 (Add small clarification around using pointers derived from references)
- #104315 (Improve spans with `use crate::{self}`)
- #104320 (Use `derive_const` and rm manual StructuralEq impl)
- #104357 (add is_sized method on Abi and Layout, and use it)
- #104365 (Add x tool to triagebot)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix missing reexports' doc comments
Fixes#81893.
The issue was that an import directly "links" to the target without the intermediate imports. Unfortunately, to fix this bug we need to go through them one by one. To do so, I take the import path direct parent (so `b` in `a:🅱️:c`) and then look for `c` into it.
r? `@notriddle`
Fix up a Fluent message
Fix up a Fluent message which contained arrows `->` after [selectors](https://projectfluent.org/fluent/guide/selectors.html). The original author probably thought that they were required as part of the selector syntax but in reality they were interpreted as literal text and actually showed up in the emitted diagnostic.
This wasn't caught during the diagnostic migration since the branch constructing the diagnostic in question (`rustc_infer::errors::LifetimeMismatchLabels::Normal`) was not exercised by the UI test suite. I've added two more test cases to do so (one testing `LifetimeMismatchLabels::Normal` where `hir_equal == true` and one where `hir_equal == false`).
Diff visualizing the `->` bug (`master` vs `fix-up-a-fluent-message`):
```diff
error[E0623]: lifetime mismatch
--> src/test/ui/implied-bounds/hrlt-implied-trait-bounds-guard.rs:39:30
|
39 | fn badboi3<'in_, 'out, T>(a: Foo<'in_, 'out, (&'in_ T, &'out T)>, sadness: &'in_ T) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-------^^-------^^
| | |
| | these two types are declared with different lifetimes...
- | ...but data-> from `a` flows-> into `a` here
+ | ...but data from `a` flows into `a` here
```
rustdoc: change `.src-line-numbers > span` to `.src-line-numbers > a`
Example: https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/line-anchors/test_dingus/fn.test.html
This allows people to treat them like real links, such as right-click to copy URL, and makes the line numbers in a scraped example work at all, when before this commit was added, they had the clickable pointer cursor but did not actually do anything when clicked.
Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed
Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed
This makes it a lot easier to understand what commands will be run without
having to parse the `-vv` output, which isn't meant to be user facing.
I also want to change these messages at some point (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102003) and this change will make it easier to paste a before/after comparison without having to actually build a stage 2 compiler.
linker: Refactoring and fixes to native library linking
This PR contains a bunch of code cleanup and comment rearrangements + 2 fixes for `-Zpacked-bundled-libs`.
It's better to look at individual commits.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104110 (prevent uninitialized access in black_box for zero-sized-types)
- #104117 (Mark `trait_upcasting` feature no longer incomplete.)
- #104144 (Suggest removing unnecessary `.` to use a floating point literal)
- #104250 (Migrate no result page link color to CSS variables)
- #104261 (More accurately report error when formal and expected signature types differ)
- #104263 (Add a reference to ilog2 in leading_zeros integer docs)
- #104308 (Remove the old `ValidAlign` name)
- #104319 (Fix non clickable source link)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Mark `trait_upcasting` feature no longer incomplete.
This marks the `trait_upcasting` feature no longer incomplete since #101336 has been settled for a little while.
r? ``````@jackh726``````
Delay `include_bytes` to AST lowering
Hopefully addresses #65818.
This PR introduces a new `ExprKind::IncludedBytes` which stores the path and bytes of a file included with `include_bytes!()`. We can then create a literal from the bytes during AST lowering, which means we don't need to escape the bytes into valid UTF8 which is the cause of most of the overhead of embedding large binary blobs.
Add tier 3 no_std AArch64/x86_64 support for the QNX Neutrino RTOS
This change allows to compile `no_std` applications for the QNX Neutrino Real-time operating system for ARM 64 bit CPUs.
Tested with QNX Neutrino 7.1.
Partially discussed in [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Adding.20QNX.20as.20target).
---
> ## Tier 3 target policy
>
> At this tier, the Rust project provides no official support for a target, so we
place minimal requirements on the introduction of targets.
>
>A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the
compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge
broader compiler team consensus via a [Major Change Proposal (MCP)][MCP].
>
>A proposed target or target-specific patch that substantially changes code
shared with other targets (not just target-specific code) must be reviewed and
approved by the appropriate team for that shared code before acceptance.
>
>- A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
(The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
See also nto-qnx.md; designated developers are:
- Florian Bartels, `Florian.Bartels@elektrobit.com`, https://github.com/flba-eb
- Tristan Roach, `TRoach@blackberry.com`, https://github.com/gh-tr
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
(such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
disambiguate it.
`aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx7.1.0` and `x86_64-pc-nto-qnx7.1.0` have been chosen as these
strings are used in the official QNX Neutrino toolchain (for `C`/`C++`). It should also
harmonize with the other Rust targets.
The version (`7.1.0 `) is needed because libc needs to distinguish between different
versions (`target_env` is set to `710` for QNX Neutrino 7.1): For example, functions are removed from 7.0
to 7.1, sometimes the signature of functions is slightly changed or size/alignment of structs.
I'm expecting the same for future versions.
This works very well in e.g. `libc` (tested with 7.0 which I'm not going to support).
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
No issue as far as I can see.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
Ok
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
subject to any new license requirements.
No change for host tools. When cross-compiling for QNX Neutrino, the compiler/linker
driver "qcc" is called. It should be possible (but not tested) to use other
(OSS) compilers/linkers to produce working binaries.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
Only rustc is required for code generation (i.e. no additional libraries to
generate code). Linking of executables requires the ordinary runtime libraries
`crt` and `libc`.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
(CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
developers or users.
>- Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
I see no issues with any of the above.
>- Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
target not implementing those portions.
`core` and `alloc` should be working (no change required). `std` implementation
is ongoing and will be provided separately.
>- The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
see nto-qnx.md
>- Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
such notifications.
Ok
>- Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
Ok
