fix(bootstrap/dist): use versioned dirs when vendoring
Currently, if you attempt to run ui tests in a vendored build, you will
see this failure
```
---- [ui] tests/ui/issues/issue-21763.rs stdout ----
diff of stderr:
8 = note: required because it appears within the type `(Rc<()>, Rc<()>)`
9 = note: required for `hashbrown::raw::RawTable<(Rc<()>, Rc<()>)>` to implement `Send`
10 note: required because it appears within the type `hashbrown::map::HashMap<Rc<()>, Rc<()>, RandomState>`
- --> $HASHBROWN_SRC_LOCATION
+ --> /rust/deps/hashbrown/src/map.rs:190:12
12 note: required because it appears within the type `HashMap<Rc<()>, Rc<()>>`
13 --> $SRC_DIR/std/src/collections/hash/map.rs:LL:COL
14 note: required by a bound in `foo`
```
This happens because the code that attempts to remap
`HASHBROWN_SRC_LOCATION` expects it to be under `hashbrown-$version`,
which is the case in a normal cargo registry, but not when vendoring, where
by default crates may not have the version in their directory name.
This change passes `--versioned-dirs` to `cargo vendor` to enforce that
every crate includes the version in the subdir name, which fixes the ui
test and brings `--enable-vendor` builds closer to normal ones.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #122842 (Don't emit an error about failing to produce a file with a specific name if user never gave an explicit name)
- #122881 (Delegation: fix ICE on `bound_vars` divergence)
- #122910 (Validate that we're only matching on unit struct for path pattern)
- #122970 (Use `chunk_by` when building `ReverseSccGraph`)
- #122988 (add even more tests! )
- #122999 (Fix unpretty UI test when /tmp does not exist)
- #123001 (Rename `{enter,exit}_lint_attrs` to `check_attributes{,_post}`)
- #123022 (Add `async-closures/once.rs` back to cranelift tests)
- #123034 (Add a bunch of needs-unwind annotations to tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rename `{enter,exit}_lint_attrs` to `check_attributes{,_post}`
Several places in Clippy want to check all the attributes of a node, we end up using `hir().attrs()` from several different `check_` functions (e.g. [in our doc lints](95c62ffae9/clippy_lints/src/doc/mod.rs (L396))) but this is error prone, we recently found that doc lints weren't triggering on struct fields for example
I went to add a `check_attributes` function but realised `enter_lint_attrs` is already this, the rename is to encourage their use
Also removes `LateContextAndPass::visit_attribute` since it's unused - `visit_attribute` for HIR visitors is only called by `hir().walk_attributes()` which lint passes do not use
Don't emit an error about failing to produce a file with a specific name if user never gave an explicit name
Fixes#122509
You can ask `rustc` to produce some intermediate results with `--emit foo`, this operation comes in two flavors: `--emit asm` and `--emit asm=foo.s`. First one produces one or more `.s` files without any name guarantees, second one renames it into `foo.s`. Second version only works when compiler produces a single file - for asm files this means using a single compilation unit for example.
In case compilation produced more than a single file `rustc` runs following check to emit some warnings:
```rust
if crate_output.outputs.contains_key(&output_type) {
// 2) Multiple codegen units, with `--emit foo=some_name`. We have
// no good solution for this case, so warn the user.
sess.dcx().emit_warn(errors::IgnoringEmitPath { extension });
} else if crate_output.single_output_file.is_some() {
// 3) Multiple codegen units, with `-o some_name`. We have
// no good solution for this case, so warn the user.
sess.dcx().emit_warn(errors::IgnoringOutput { extension });
} else {
// 4) Multiple codegen units, but no explicit name. We
// just leave the `foo.0.x` files in place.
// (We don't have to do any work in this case.)
}
```
Comment in the final `else` branch implies that if user didn't ask for a specific name - there's no need to emit warnings. However because of the internal representation of `crate_output.outputs` - this doesn't work as expected: if user asked to produce an asm file without giving it an implicit name it will contain `Some(None)`.
To fix the problem new code actually checks if user gave an explicit name. I think this was an original intentional behavior, at least comments imply that.
Move `--sysroot` argument out of the argument file to fix miri issue
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3404.
For now, miri needs this argument to be moved out of the arg file so they can update it if needed.
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@notriddle`
phase_rustdoc: add a heuristic to make us more certain that this is really rustdoc
Also add anyhow to test-cargo-miri; it has a custom build probe and is widely used so let's make sure the build script does not fail.
Add more comments to the bootstrap code that handles `tests/coverage`
At the bootstrap level, coverage tests are a bit more complicated than other test suites, because we want to run the same set of test files in multiple different modes, in a way that's convenient and flexible when invoked manually.
This PR adds a few more comments to explain what's going on.
ci: Build gccjit from a git archive
A full `git clone` of GCC includes quite a lot of history, and it's
completely unnecessary for building it in CI. We can use a GitHub
archive URL to get a simple tarball that is much faster to download.
Also, the `gcc-build` directory can be removed after install to reduce
the image size even further.
miri script: build with stable toolchain
`./miri toolchain` sets up a `rustup override miri`. But then if something goes wrong and the `miri` toolchain doesn't work, one can't even run `./miri toolchain` again as building miri-script needs a toolchain...
So let's always use stable to build miri-script, making it override-independent. I assume everyone will have that installed.
Track run-make-support lib in common inputs stamp
So that when the support library gets modified, `run-make` tests are forced to re-run instead of being still ignored as if nothing changed.
Fixes#122961.
conditionally ignore fatal diagnostic in the SilentEmitter
This change is primarily meant to allow rustfmt to ignore all diagnostics when using the `SilentEmitter`. Back in #121301 the `SilentEmitter` was shared between rustc and rustfmt. This changed rustfmt's behavior from ignoring all diagnostic to emitting fatal diagnostics, which lead to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6109.
These changes allow rustfmt to maintain its previous behaviour when using the `SilentEmitter`, while allowing rustc code to still emit fatal diagnostics.
Add libc direct test for shims and update CONTRIBUTING.md
Add more ``libc`` direct test for shims as mentioned in #3179.
Changes:
- Added ``libc`` direct tests for ``rename`` and ``ftruncate64``
- Added the command for running ``pass-dep`` test in ``CONTRIBUTING.md``
`rustdoc --test`: Prevent reaching the maximum size of command-line by using files for arguments if there are too many
Fixes#122722.
Thanks to this I discovered that rust was using ``@`` to add arguments from a file, quite convenient.
If there are too many `cfg` arguments given to `rustdoc --test`, it'll now put them into a temporary file and passing it as argument to the rustc command.
I added a test with 100_000 `cfg` arguments to ensure it'll not break again.
r? `@notrid`
refactor check_{lang,library}_ub: use a single intrinsic
This enacts the plan I laid out [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122282#issuecomment-1996917998): use a single intrinsic, called `ub_checks` (in aniticpation of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/725), that just exposes the value of `debug_assertions` (consistently implemented in both codegen and the interpreter). Put the language vs library UB logic into the library.
This makes it easier to do something like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122282 in the future: that just slightly alters the semantics of `ub_checks` (making it more approximating when crates built with different flags are mixed), but it no longer affects whether these checks can happen in Miri or compile-time.
The first commit just moves things around; I don't think these macros and functions belong into `intrinsics.rs` as they are not intrinsics.
r? `@saethlin`
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120577 (Stabilize slice_split_at_unchecked)
- #122698 (Cancel `cargo update` job if there's no updates)
- #122780 (Rename `hir::Local` into `hir::LetStmt`)
- #122915 (Delay a bug if no RPITITs were found)
- #122916 (docs(sync): normalize dot in fn summaries)
- #122921 (Enable more mir-opt tests in debug builds)
- #122922 (-Zprint-type-sizes: print the types of awaitees and unnamed coroutine locals.)
- #122927 (Change an ICE regression test to use the original reproducer)
- #122930 (add panic location to 'panicked while processing panic')
- #122931 (Fix some typos in the pin.rs)
- #122933 (tag_for_variant follow-ups)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Report retags as distinct from real memory accesses for data races
This changes the error reporting for data races such that reference invariants are no longer reported as real read and writes.
Before:
```
Data race detected between (1) non-atomic write on thread `unnamed-6` and (2) non-atomic read on thread `unnamed-5` at alloc1034971+0x10c. (2) just happened here
```
After:
```
Data race detected between (1) non-atomic write on thread `unnamed-8` and (2) shared reference invariant on thread `unnamed-6` at alloc1018329+0x190. (2) just happened here
```
Non-atomic read accesses from the *other* thread don't have this information tracked so those are called `some potential non-atomic read access` here.
Rename `hir::Local` into `hir::LetStmt`
Follow-up of #122776.
As discussed on [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Improve.20naming.20of.20.60ExprKind.3A.3ALet.60.3F).
I made this change into a separate PR because I'm less sure about this change as is. For example, we have `visit_local` and `LocalSource` items. Is it fine to keep these two as is (I supposed it is but I prefer to ask) or not? Having `Node::Local(LetStmt)` makes things more explicit but is it going too far?
r? ```@oli-obk```
Let codegen decide when to `mem::swap` with immediates
Making `libcore` decide this is silly; the backend has so much better information about when it's a good idea.
Thus this PR introduces a new `typed_swap` intrinsic with a fallback body, and replaces that fallback implementation when swapping immediates or scalar pairs.
r? oli-obk
Replaces #111744, and means we'll never need more libs PRs like #111803 or #107140
