Move gensym operations from `Symbol` to `Ident`
Gensyms are always at the `Ident` level, and long-term we probably want to record gensym-ness in hygiene data.
r? @petrochenkov
rustc: Improve type size assertions
Now they
- Tell what the new size is, when it changes
- Do not require passing an identifier
```
::: src\libsyntax\parse\token.rs:223:1
|
223 | static_assert_size!(Token, 123);
| -------------------------------- in this macro invocation
|
= note: expected type `[(); 123]`
found type `[(); 16]`
```
Note that the `is_gensymed` call on `primitive_types` is unnecessary
because that table only contains the name of primitive types (e.g.
`i32`) and never contains gensyms.
Include expression to wait for to the span of Await
Currently the span of `await!` only includes itself:
```rust
await!(3);
// ^^^^^
```
This PR changes it so that the span holds the whole `await!` expression:
```rust
await!(3);
// ^^^^^^^^^
Move token tree related lexer state to a separate struct
Just a types-based refactoring.
We only used a bunch of fields when tokenizing into a token tree, so let's move them out of the base lexer
Use `Symbol` more
A `Symbol` can be equated with a string (e.g. `&str`). This involves a
TLS lookup to get the chars (and a Mutex lock in a parallel compiler)
and then a char-by-char comparison. This functionality is convenient but
avoids one of the main benefits of `Symbol`s, which is fast equality
comparisons.
This PR removes the `Symbol`/string equality operations, forcing a lot
of existing string occurrences to become `Symbol`s. Fortunately, these
are almost all static strings (many are attribute names) and we can add
static `Symbol`s as necessary, and very little extra interning occurs.
The benefits are (a) a slight speedup (possibly greater in a parallel
compiler), and (b) the code is a lot more principled about `Symbol` use.
The main downside is verbosity, particularly with more `use
syntax::symbol::symbols` items.
r? @Zoxc
Fix async desugaring providing wrong input to procedural macros.
Fixes#60674.
This PR fixes a minor oversight introduced by #60535 where unused `mut` binding modes were removed from the arguments to an `async fn` (as they were added to the statement that we insert into the closure body). However, this meant that the input to procedural macros was incorrect. This removes that and instead fixes the `unused_mut` error that it avoided.
r? @cramertj
cc @taiki-e
Comment ext::tt::transcribe
Also did a bit of minor cleanup (remove unidiomatic use of `Add` and an unneeded `clone`). No functionality changes.
r? @petrochenkov
Identify when a stmt could have been parsed as an expr
There are some expressions that can be parsed as a statement without
a trailing semicolon depending on the context, which can lead to
confusing errors due to the same looking code being accepted in some
places and not others. Identify these cases and suggest enclosing in
parenthesis making the parse non-ambiguous without changing the
accepted grammar.
Fix#54186, cc #54482, fix#59975, fix#47287.
