Exhaustiveness: remove the need for arena-allocation within the algorithm
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119688, exhaustiveness checking doesn't need access to the arena anymore. This simplifies the lifetime story and makes it compile on stable without the extra dependency.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Improve UEFI target docs
* Add a section showing exactly how to build a driver instead of an application
* Add links to the crates mentioned in the doc
CC `@dvdhrm`
Move personality implementation out of PAL
The module already follows the new convention described in #117276. This PR also includes a small fix in the tidy pal check, that was just an oversight in #117285.
Suggest Upgrading Compiler for Gated Features
This PR addresses #117318
I have a few questions:
1. Do we want to specify the current version and release date of the compiler? I have added this in via environment variables, which I found in the code for the rustc cli where it handles the `--version` flag
a. How can I handle the changing message in the tests?
3. Do we want to only show this message when the compiler is old?
a. How can we determine when the compiler is old?
I'll wait until we figure out the message to bless the tests
Move platform modules into `sys::pal`
This is the initial step of #117276. `sys` just re-exports everything from the current `sys` for now, I'll move the implementations for the individual features one-by-one after this PR merges.
Add explicit `none()` value variant in check-cfg
This PR adds an explicit none value variant in check-cfg values: `values(none())`.
Currently the only way to define the none variant is with an empty `values()` which means that if someone has a cfg that takes none and strings they need to use two invocations: `--check-cfg=cfg(foo) --check-cfg=cfg(foo, values("bar"))`.
Which would now be `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none(),"bar"))`, this is simpler and easier to understand.
`--check-cfg=cfg(foo)`, `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values())` and `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none()))` would be equivalent.
*Another motivation for doing this is to make empty `values()` actually means no-values, but this is orthogonal to this PR and adding `none()` is sufficient in it-self.*
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@petrochenkov`
By making it an `EscapeError` instead of a `LitError`. This makes it
like the other errors produced when checking string literals contents,
e.g. for invalid escape sequences or bare CR chars.
NOTE: this means these errors are issued earlier, before expansion,
which changes behaviour. It will be possible to move the check back to
the later point if desired. If that happens, it's likely that all the
string literal contents checks will be delayed together.
One nice thing about this: the old approach had some code in
`report_lit_error` to calculate the span of the nul char from a range.
This code used a hardwired `+2` to account for the `c"` at the start of
a C string literal, but this should have changed to a `+3` for raw C
string literals to account for the `cr"`, which meant that the caret in
`cr"` nul error messages was one short of where it should have been. The
new approach doesn't need any of this and avoids the off-by-one error.
Remove `DiagnosticBuilder::buffer`
`DiagnosticBuilder::buffer` doesn't do much, and part of what it does (for `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`) it shouldn't.
This PR strips it back, replaces its uses, and finally removes it, making a few cleanups in the vicinity along the way.
r? ``@oli-obk``
annotate-snippets: update to 0.10
Ports `annotate-snippets` to 0.10, temporary dupes versions; other crates left that depends on 0.9 is `ui_test` and `rustfmt`.
bump bootstrap dependencies
This PR removes hard-coded patch versions, updates bootstrap's dependency stack to recent versions (some of the versions were released 3-4 years ago), and removes a few dependencies from bootstrap.
Removed dependencies:
One consequence is that errors returned by
`maybe_new_parser_from_source_str` now must be consumed, so a bunch of
places that previously ignored those errors now cancel them. (Most of
them explicitly dropped the errors before. I guess that was to indicate
"we are explicitly ignoring these", though I'm not 100% sure.)
