rustc_resolve: overhaul `#![feature(uniform_paths)]` error reporting.
Fixes#53408 by only considering external crates to conflict within their (type/module) namespace, *not* with the value or macro namespaces, and also by adding a special-cased error for redundant `use crate_name;` imports (without actually allowing them).
Also, all canaries for a given import are grouped into one diagnostic per namespace, in order to make block-scoped ambiguities clearer.
See changed/added tests for more details.
r? @petrochenkov cc @aturon @joshtriplett
syntax_ext: remove leftover span_err_if_not_stage0 macro.
I believe this is the right fix for #53380, although I'm not sure what happened.
My guess is this copy of the macro was accidentally missed when others were removed?
cc @matthewjasper @varkor (please do not put this in a rollup, in case it fails)
Addressed #51602Fixed#51602
r? @estebank
here I have addressed the case where `in` was not expected right after `if` block. Speaking of `type ascription` I am not sure if this the best approach which I have implemented. Plus I think one more test case can be added to test `type-ascription` case, though I don't have any at this point of time. I will ping you again if all existing testcases pass.
Don't accept non-string literals for the format string in writeln
This is to improve diagnostics.
`println` and `eprintln` were already fixed by #52394.
Fixes#30143
For move errors, suggest match ergonomics instead of `ref`
Partially fixes issue #52423. Also makes errors and suggestions more consistent between move-from-place and move-from-value errors.
Limitations:
- Only the first pattern in a match arm can have a "consider removing this borrow operator" suggestion.
- Suggestions don't always compile as-is (see the TODOs in the test for details).
Sorry for the really long test. I wanted to make sure I handled every case I could think of, and it turned out there were a lot of them.
Questions:
- Is there any particular applicability I should set on those suggestions?
- Are the notes about the `Copy` trait excessive?
