Make PhantomData #[structural_match]
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55028
This makes `PhantomData<T>` structurally matchable, irrespective of whether `T` is, per the discussion on this week's language team meeting (the general consensus was that this was a bug-fix).
All types containing `PhantomData<T>` and which used `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]` and were previously not `#[structural_match]` only because of `PhantomData<T>` will now be `#[structural_match]`.
r? @nikomatsakis
NLL Diagnostic Review 3: Unions not reinitialized after assignment into field
Fixes#55651, #55652.
This PR makes two changes:
First, it updates the dataflow builder to add an init for the place
containing a union if there is an assignment into the field of
that union.
Second, it stops a "use of uninitialized" error occuring when there is an
assignment into the field of an uninitialized union that was previously
initialized. Making this assignment would re-initialize the union, as
tested in `src/test/ui/borrowck/borrowck-union-move-assign.nll.stderr`.
The check for previous initialization ensures that we do not start
supporting partial initialization yet (cc #21232, #54499, #54986).
This PR also fixes#55652 which was marked as requiring investigation
as the changes in this PR add an error that was previously missing
(and mentioned in the review comments) and confirms that the error
that was present is correct and a result of earlier partial
initialization changes in NLL.
r? @pnkfelix (due to earlier work with partial initialization)
cc @nikomatsakis
Now the main span focuses on the erroneous not-a-function callee,
while showing the entire call expression is relegated to a secondary
span. In the case where the erroneous callee is itself a call, we
point out the definition, and, if the call expression spans multiple
lines, tentatively suggest a semicolon (because we suspect that the
"outer" call is actually supposed to be a tuple).
The new `bug!` assertion is, in fact, safe (`confirm_builtin_call` is
only called by `check_call`, which is only called with a first arg of
kind `ExprKind::Call` in `check_expr_kind`).
Resolves#51055.
resolve: Filter away macro prelude in modules with `#[no_implicit_prelude]` on 2018 edition
This is a tiny thing.
For historical reasons macro prelude (macros from `#[macro_use] extern crate ...`, including `extern crate std`) is still available in modules with `#[no_implicit_prelude]`.
This PR provides proper isolation and removes those names from scope.
`#[no_implicit_prelude]` modules still have built-in types (`u8`), built-in attributes (`#[inline]`) and built-in macros (`env!("PATH")`) in scope. We can introduce some `#[no_implicit_prelude_at_all]` to remove those as well, but that's a separate issue.
The change is done only on 2018 edition for backward compatibility.
I'm pretty sure this can be done on 2015 as well because `#[no_implicit_prelude]` is rarely used, but I don't want to go through the crater/deprecation process right now, maybe later.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53977
r? @ghost
ICE with #![feature(nll)] and elided lifetimes
Fixes#55394.
This commit fixes an ICE and determines the correct return span in cases
with a method implemented on a struct with an an elided lifetime.
r? @pnkfelix
NLL: Update box insensitivity test
This is just keeping one of our tests honest with respect to NLL, in two ways:
1. Adds uses of borrows that would otherwise be too short to observe the error that we would have expected to see...
2. ... I say "would have expected" because all of the errors in this file are part of the reversion of rust-lang/rfcs#130 that is attached to NLL (you can see more discussion of this here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43234#issuecomment-411017768 )
Removed unneeded instance of `// revisions` from a lint test
Removed an unneeded instance of `// revisions`; the compare-mode=nll shows the output is identical now.
cc #54528
Take supertraits into account when calculating associated types
Fixes#24010 and #23856. Applies to trait aliases too.
As a by-product, this PR also makes repeated bindings of the same associated item in the same definition a hard error. This was previously a warning with a note about it becoming a hard error in the future. See #50589 for more info.
I talked about this with @nikomatsakis recently, but only very superficially, so this shouldn't stop anyone from assigning it to themself to review and r+.
N.B. The "WIP" commits represent imperfect attempts to solve the problem just for trait objects, but I've left them in for reference for the sake of whomever is reviewing this.
CC @carllerche @theemathas @durka @mbrubeck
Do not attempt to ascribe projections out of a ty var
If we encounter `_` ascribed to structural pattern like `(a, b)`, just skip relate_types.
Fix#55552
Bubble up an overflow error so that rustdoc can ignore it
fixes#54524
Idk how to write a test for this, other than trying to minimize the entire diesel crate. If desirable I will do that.
Note that there are many other such overflow errors hiding out there. Should we try to proactively eliminate them or do we just whack-a-mole them?
cc @GuillaumeGomez
r? @nikomatsakis
Update emscripten
This updates emscripten to 1.38.15, which is based on LLVM 6.0.1 and would allow us to drop code for handling LLVM 4.
The main issue I ran into is that exporting statics through `EXPORTED_FUNCTIONS` no longer works. As far as I understand exporting non-functions doesn't really make sense under emscripten anyway, so I've modified the symbol export code to not even try.
Closes#52323.
[regression - rust2018]: unused_mut lint false positives on nightly
Fixes#55344.
This commit filters out locals that have never been initialized for
consideration in the `unused_mut` lint.
This is intended to detect when the statement that would have
initialized the local was removed as unreachable code. In these cases,
we would not want to lint. This is the same behaviour as the AST borrow
checker.
This is achieved by taking advantage of an existing pass over the MIR
for the `unused_mut` lint and creating a set of those locals that were
never initialized.
r? @pnkfelix
Avoid panic when matching function call
Fix#55718
This bug is introduced by #53751. The original code checked `Def::AssociatedConst(..) | Def::Method(..)` before `pat_ty.no_bound_vars().expect("expected fn type")`. But somehow I exchanged the sequence carelessly. Sorry about that.
r? @petrochenkov
Sidestep link error from rustfix'ed code by using a *defined* static.
As a drive-by, added `-g` to the compile-flags so that the test more
reliably fails to compile when the extern static in question is *not*
provided. (I.e. this is making the test more robust in the face of
potential future revisions.)
Fix#54388.
(The commit prior to this actual passes our test suite, "thanks"
to #55695. But since I am aware of that bug, I took advantage of it
in choosing how to order my commit series...)
