This stabilizes dereferencing immutable raw pointers in const contexts.
It does not stabilize `*mut T` dereferencing. This is placed behind the
`const_raw_mut_ptr_deref` feature gate.
The exact set of permissions granted when forming a raw reference is
currently undecided https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56604.
To avoid presupposing any particular outcome, adjust the const
qualification to be compatible with decision where raw reference
constructed from `addr_of!` grants mutable access.
Noticed that this wasn't covered by any of existing tests.
The const checking and const qualification, which currently shares the
implementation with promotion, will likely need a different behaviour
here (see issue #90193).
Use type based qualification for unions
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
Fixes#90268.
`@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
Previously a local would be qualified if either one of two separate data
flow computations indicated so. First determined if a local could
contain the qualif, but ignored any forms of indirect mutation. Second
determined if a local could be mutably borrowed (and so indirectly
mutated), but which in turn ignored the qualif.
The end result was incorrect because the effect of indirect mutation was
effectivelly ignored in the all but the final stage of computation.
In the new implementation the indirect mutation is directly incorporated
into the qualif data flow. The local variable becomes immediately
qualified once it is mutably borrowed and borrowed place type can
contain the qualif.
In general we will now reject additional programs, program that were
prevously unintentionally accepted.
There are also some cases which are now accepted but were previously
rejected, because previous implementation didn't consider whether
borrowed place could have the qualif under the consideration.
to ensure that the local qualifs are affected by the state from previous
loop iterations only if the local is kept alive.
The change should be forward compatible with a stricter handling of
indirect assignments, since storage dead invalidates all existing
pointers to the local.
Fix const qualification when executed after promotion
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Fixes#89938.
Add test for issue #84957 - `str.as_bytes()` in a `const` expression
Hi, this PR adds a test for issue #84957 . I'm quite new to rustc so let me know if there's anything else that needs doing 😄Closes#84957
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Changes from #88558 allowed using `~const Drop` in constants by
introducing a new `NeedsNonConstDrop` qualif.
The new qualif was also used for promotion purposes, and allowed
promotion to happen for values that needs to be dropped but which
do have a const drop impl.
Since for promoted the drop implementation is never executed,
this lead to observable change in behaviour. For example:
```rust
struct Panic();
impl const Drop for Panic {
fn drop(&mut self) {
panic!();
}
}
fn main() {
let _ = &Panic();
}
```
Restore the use of `NeedsDrop` qualif during promotion to avoid the issue.
Remove trailing semicolon from macro call span
Macro call site spans are now less surprising/more consistent since they no longer contain a semicolon after the macro call.
The downside is that we need to do a little guesswork to get the semicolon in diagnostics. But this should not be noticeable since it is rare for the semicolon to not immediately follow the macro call.
Stabilize `unreachable_unchecked` as `const fn`
Closes#53188
This PR stabilizes `core::hint::unreachable_unchecked` as `const fn`. MIRI is able to detect when this method is called. Stabilization was delayed until `const_panic` was stabilized so as to avoid users calling this method in its place (thus resulting in runtime UB). With #89508, that is no longer an issue.
````@rustbot```` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang +S-blocked
(not sure why it's T-lang, but that's what the tracking issue is)
add some more testcases
resolves#52893resolves#68295resolves#87750resolves#88071
All these issues have been fixed according to glacier. Just adding a test so it can be closed.
Can anybody tell me why the github keywords do not work? 🤔
Please edit this post if you can fix it.
Stabilize `const_panic`
Closes#51999
FCP completed in #89006
```@rustbot``` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang
cc ```@oli-obk``` for review (not `r?`'ing as not on lang team)
Constify ?-operator for Result and Option
Try to make `?`-operator usable in `const fn` with `Result` and `Option`, see #74935 . Note that the try-operator itself was constified in #87237.
TODO
* [x] Add tests for const T -> T conversions
* [x] cleanup commits
* [x] Remove `#![allow(incomplete_features)]`
* [?] Await decision in #86808 - I'm not sure
* [x] Await support for parsing `~const` in bootstrapping compiler
* [x] Tracking issue(s)? - #88674
Use larger span for adjustment THIR expressions
Currently, we use a relatively 'small' span for THIR
expressions generated by an 'adjustment' (e.g. an autoderef,
autoborrow, unsizing). As a result, if a borrow generated
by an adustment ends up causing a borrowcheck error, for example:
```rust
let mut my_var = String::new();
let my_ref = &my_var
my_var.push('a');
my_ref;
```
then the span for the mutable borrow may end up referring
to only the base expression (e.g. `my_var`), rather than
the method call which triggered the mutable borrow
(e.g. `my_var.push('a')`)
Due to a quirk of the MIR borrowck implementation,
this doesn't always get exposed in migration mode,
but it does in many cases.
This commit makes THIR building consistently use 'larger'
spans for adjustment expressions. These spans are recoded
when we first create the adjustment during typecheck. For
example, an autoref adjustment triggered by a method call
will record the span of the entire method call.
The intent of this change it make it clearer to users
when it's the specific way in which a variable is
used (for example, in a method call) that produdes
a borrowcheck error. For example, an error message
claiming that a 'mutable borrow occurs here' might
be confusing if it just points at a usage of a variable
(e.g. `my_var`), when no `&mut` is in sight. Pointing
at the entire expression should help to emphasize
that the method call itself is responsible for
the mutable borrow.
In several cases, this makes the `#![feature(nll)]` diagnostic
output match up exactly with the default (migration mode) output.
As a result, several `.nll.stderr` files end up getting removed
entirely.
Add an intermediate representation to exhaustiveness checking
The exhaustiveness checking algorithm keeps deconstructing patterns into a `Constructor` and some `Fields`, but does so a bit all over the place. This PR introduces a new representation for patterns that already has that information, so we only compute it once at the start.
I find this makes code easier to follow. In particular `DeconstructedPat::specialize` is a lot simpler than what happened before, and more closely matches the description of the algorithm. I'm also hoping this could help for the project of librarifying exhaustiveness for rust_analyzer since it decouples the algorithm from `rustc_middle::Pat`.
Currently, we use a relatively 'small' span for THIR
expressions generated by an 'adjustment' (e.g. an autoderef,
autoborrow, unsizing). As a result, if a borrow generated
by an adustment ends up causing a borrowcheck error, for example:
```rust
let mut my_var = String::new();
let my_ref = &my_var
my_var.push('a');
my_ref;
```
then the span for the mutable borrow may end up referring
to only the base expression (e.g. `my_var`), rather than
the method call which triggered the mutable borrow
(e.g. `my_var.push('a')`)
Due to a quirk of the MIR borrowck implementation,
this doesn't always get exposed in migration mode,
but it does in many cases.
This commit makes THIR building consistently use 'larger'
spans for adjustment expressions
The intent of this change it make it clearer to users
when it's the specific way in which a variable is
used (for example, in a method call) that produdes
a borrowcheck error. For example, an error message
claiming that a 'mutable borrow occurs here' might
be confusing if it just points at a usage of a variable
(e.g. `my_var`), when no `&mut` is in sight. Pointing
at the entire expression should help to emphasize
that the method call itself is responsible for
the mutable borrow.
In several cases, this makes the `#![feature(nll)]` diagnostic
output match up exactly with the default (migration mode) output.
As a result, several `.nll.stderr` files end up getting removed
entirely.
Add a separate error for `dyn Trait` in `const fn`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable" error was used for both trait bounds (`<T: Trait>`) and trait objects (`dyn Trait`). This was pretty confusing.
This PR adds a separate error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
This is follow up to #88907
r? ``@estebank``
``@rustbot`` label: +A-diagnostics
Allow `panic!("{}", computed_str)` in const fn.
Special-case `panic!("{}", arg)` and translate it to `panic_display(&arg)`. `panic_display` will behave like `panic_any` in cosnt eval and behave like `panic!(format_args!("{}", arg))` in runtime.
This should bring Rust 2015 and 2021 to feature parity in terms of `const_panic`; and hopefully would unblock the stabilisation of #51999.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-compiler +T-libs +A-const-eval +A-const-fn
r? `@oli-obk`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable"
error was used for both trait bounds (<T: Trait>) and trait objects (dyn Trait).
This was pretty confusing.
This patch adds a separeta error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn
are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the
following error:
```rust
struct Type<T>
impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
fn const f() {}
}
```
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions
"const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl.
This commits adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following:
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
4 | pub const fn f() {}
| ---------------- function declared as const here
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
Fix drop handling for `if let` expressions
MIR lowering for `if let` expressions is now more complicated now that
`if let` exists in HIR. This PR adds a scope for the variables bound in
an `if let` expression and then uses an approach similar to how we
handle loops to ensure that we reliably drop the correct variables.
Closes#88307
cc `@flip1995` `@richkadel` `@c410-f3r`
