Recover on `const X = 42;` and infer type + Error Stash API
Here we:
1. Introduce a notion of the "error stash".
This is a map in the `Handler` to which you can `err.stash(...)` away your diagnostics and then steal them in a later "phase" of the compiler (e.g. stash in parser, steal in typeck) to enrich them with more information that isn't available in the previous "phase".
I believe I've covered all the bases to make sure these diagnostics are actually emitted eventually even under `#[cfg(FALSE)]` but please check my logic.
2. Recover when parsing `[const | static mut?] $ident = $expr;` which has a missing type.
Use the "error stash" to stash away the error and later steal the error in typeck where we emit the error as `MachineApplicable` with the actual inferred type. This builds on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62804.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2545
r? @estebank
Fixes#63677
RFC #2071 (impl-trait-existential-types) does not explicitly state how
impl trait type alises should interact with coherence. However, there's
only one choice which makes sense - coherence should look at the
underlying type (i.e. the 'defining' type of the impl trait) of the type
alias, just like we do for non-impl-trait type aliases.
Specifically, impl trait type alises which resolve to a local type
should be treated like a local type with respect to coherence (e.g.
impl trait type aliases which resolve to a forieign type should be
treated as a foreign type, and those that resolve to a local type should
be treated as a local type).
Since neither inherent impls nor direct trait impl (i.e. `impl MyType`
or `impl MyTrait for MyType`) are allowd for type aliases, this
usually does not come up. Before we ever attempt to do coherence
checking, we will have errored out if an impl trait type alias was used
directly in an 'impl' clause.
However, during trait selection, we sometimes need to prove bounds like
'T: Sized' for some type 'T'. If 'T' is an impl trait type alias, this
requires to know the coherence behavior for impl trait type aliases when
we perform coherence checking.
Note: Since determining the underlying type of an impl trait type alias
requires us to perform body type checking, this commit causes us to type
check some bodies easlier than we otherwise would have. However, since
this is done through a query, this shouldn't cause any problems
For completeness, I've added an additional test of the coherence-related
behavior of impl trait type aliases.
Infer consts more consistently
Moved some duplicated logic in `TypeRelation` methods into `super_combined_consts`. Before some `TypeRelation`s like `Lub` wasn't using `replace_if_possible`, meaning some inference types were staying around longer than they should be.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64519
r? @varkor
Allow using fn pointers in const fn with unleash miri
This allows using function pointers in const fns when `-Zunleash-the-miri-within-you` is enabled.
If the call to the `const fn` happens in a `const`-context, the function pointer is required to point to a `const fn`:
```rust
fn non_const_fn() -> i32 { 42 }
const fn const_fn() -> i32 { 42 }
const fn foo(x: fn() -> i32) -> i32 { x() }
let x: i32 = foo(non_const_fn_ptr); // OK
let y: i32 = foo(const_fn_ptr); // OK
const X: i32 = foo(non_const_fn_ptr); // ERROR: `non_const_fn` is not `const fn`
const Y: i32 = foo(const_fn_ptr); // OK
```
r? @oli-obk
Fix the span used to suggest avoiding for-loop moves
It was using the snippet from the "use" span, which often renders the
same, but with closures that snippet is on the start of the closure
where the value is captured. We should be using the snippet from the
span where it was moved into the `for` loop, which is `move_span`.
Fixes#64559.
Stabilize `param_attrs` in Rust 1.39.0
# Stabilization proposal
I propose that we stabilize `#![feature(param_attrs)]`.
Tracking issue: #60406
Version: 1.39 (2019-09-26 => beta, 2019-11-07 => stable).
## What is stabilized
It is now possible to add outer attributes like `#[cfg(..)]` on formal parameters of functions, closures, and function pointer types. For example:
```rust
fn len(
#[cfg(windows)] slice: &[u16],
#[cfg(not(windows))] slice: &[u8],
) -> usize {
slice.len()
}
```
## What isn't stabilized
* Documentation comments like `/// Doc` on parameters.
* Code expansion of a user-defined `#[proc_macro_attribute]` macro used on parameters.
* Built-in attributes other than `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, `allow`, `warn`, `deny`, and `forbid`. Currently, only the lints `unused_variables` and `unused_mut` have effect and may be controlled on parameters.
## Motivation
The chief motivations for stabilizing `param_attrs` include:
* Finer conditional compilation with `#[cfg(..)]` and linting control of variables.
* Richer macro DSLs created by users.
* External tools and compiler internals can take advantage of the additional information that the parameters provide.
For more examples, see the [RFC][rfc motivation].
## Reference guide
In the grammar of function and function pointer, the grammar of variadic tails (`...`) and parameters are changed respectively from:
```rust
FnParam = { pat:Pat ":" }? ty:Type;
VaradicTail = "...";
```
into:
```rust
FnParam = OuterAttr* { pat:Pat ":" }? ty:Type;
VaradicTail = OuterAttr* "...";
```
The grammar of a closure parameter is changed from:
```rust
ClosureParam = pat:Pat { ":" ty:Type }?;
```
into:
```rust
ClosureParam = OuterAttr* pat:Pat { ":" ty:Type }?;
```
More generally, where there's a list of formal (value) parameters separated or terminated by `,` and delimited by `(` and `)`. Each parameter in that list may optionally be prefixed by `OuterAttr+`.
Note that in all cases, `OuterAttr*` applies to the whole parameter and not just the pattern. This distinction matters in pretty printing and in turn for macros.
## History
* On 2018-10-15, @Robbepop proposes [RFC 2565][rfc], "Attributes in formal function parameter position".
* On 2019-04-30, [RFC 2565][rfc] is merged and the tracking issue is made.
* On 2019-06-12, a partial implementation was completed. The implementation was done in [#60669][60669] by @c410-f3r and the PR was reviewed by @petrochenkov and @Centril.
* On 2019-07-29, [#61238][61238] was fixed in [#61856][61856]. The issue fixed was that lint attributes on function args had no effect. The PR was written by @c410-f3r and reviewed by @matthewjasper, @petrochenkov, and @oli-obk.
* On 2019-08-02, a bug [#63210][63210] was filed wherein the attributes on formal parameters would not be passed to macros. The issue was about forgetting to call the relevant method in `fn print_arg` in the pretty printer. In [#63212][63212], written by @Centril on 2019-08-02 and reviewed by @davidtwco, the issue aforementioned was fixed.
* This PR stabilizes `param_attrs`.
## Tests
* [On Rust 2018, attributes aren't permitted on function parameters without a pattern in trait definitions.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2565-param-attrs/param-attrs-2018.rs)
* [All attributes that should be allowed. This includes `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, and lints check attributes.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2565-param-attrs/param-attrs-allowed.rs)
* [Built-in attributes, which should be forbidden, e.g., `#[test]`, are.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2565-param-attrs/param-attrs-builtin-attrs.rs)
* [`cfg` and `cfg_attr` are properly evaluated.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2565-param-attrs/param-attrs-cfg.rs)
* [`unused_mut`](46f405ec4d/src/test/ui/rfc-2565-param-attrs/param-attrs-cfg.rs) and [`unused_variables`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/lint-unused-variables.rs) are correctly applied to parameter patterns.
* [Pretty printing takes formal parameter attributes into account.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2565-param-attrs/param-attrs-pretty.rs)
## Possible future work
* Custom attributes inside function parameters aren't currently supported but it is something being worked on internally.
* Since documentation comments are syntactic sugar for `#[doc(...)]`, it is possible to allow literal `/// Foo` comments on function parameters.
[rfc motivation]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2565-formal-function-parameter-attributes.md#motivation
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2565
[60669]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60669
[61856]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61856
[63210]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63210
[61238]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61238
[63212]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63212
This report is a collaborative work with @Centril.
It was using the snippet from the "use" span, which often renders the
same, but with closures that snippet is on the start of the closure
where the value is captured. We should be using the snippet from the
span where it was moved into the `for` loop, which is `move_span`.
record fewer adjustment types in generator witnesses, avoid spurious drops in MIR construction
Don't record all intermediate adjustment types -- That's way more than is needed, and winds up recording types that will never appear in MIR.
Note: I'm like 90% sure that this logic is correct, but this stuff is subtle and can be hard to keep straight. However, the risk of this PR is fairly low -- if we miss types here, I believe the most common outcome is an ICE.
This fixes the original issue cited by #64477, but I'm leaving the issue open for now since there may be other cases we can detect and improve in a targeted way.
r? @Zoxc
