Because the error message that emit out is from main error of parser
The information of enum variant disappears while parsing enum variant with error
We only check the syntax of expecting token, i.e, in case #103869
It will error it without telling the message that this error is from pasring enum variant.
Propagate the sub-error from parsing enum variant to the main error of parser by chaining it with map_err
Check the sub-error before emitting the main error of parser and attach it.
Fix#103869
Instead of `ast::Lit`.
Literal lowering now happens at two different times. Expression literals
are lowered when HIR is crated. Attribute literals are lowered during
parsing.
This commit changes the language very slightly. Some programs that used
to not compile now will compile. This is because some invalid literals
that are removed by `cfg` or attribute macros will no longer trigger
errors. See this comment for more details:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102944#issuecomment-1277476773
Show note where the macro failed to match
When feeding the wrong tokens, it used to fail with a very generic error that wasn't very helpful. This change tries to help by noting where specifically the matching went wrong.
```rust
macro_rules! uwu {
(a a a b) => {};
}
uwu! { a a a c }
```
```diff
error: no rules expected the token `c`
--> macros.rs:5:14
|
1 | macro_rules! uwu {
| ---------------- when calling this macro
...
4 | uwu! { a a a c }
| ^ no rules expected this token in macro call
|
+note: while trying to match `b`
+ --> macros.rs:2:12
+ |
+2 | (a a a b) => {};
+ | ^
```
Recover from function pointer types with generic parameter list
Give a more helpful error when encountering function pointer types with a generic parameter list like `fn<'a>(&'a str) -> bool` or `fn<T>(T) -> T` and suggest moving lifetime parameters to a `for<>` parameter list.
I've added a bunch of extra code to properly handle (unlikely?) corner cases like `for<'a> fn<'b>()` (where there already exists a `for<>` parameter list) correctly suggesting `for<'a, 'b> fn()` (merging the lists). If you deem this useless, I can simplify the code by suggesting nothing at all in this case.
I am quite open to suggestions regarding the wording of the diagnostic messages.
Fixes#103487.
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics
r? diagnostics
Recover wrong-cased keywords that start items
(_this pr was inspired by [this tweet](https://twitter.com/Azumanga/status/1552982326409367561)_)
r? `@estebank`
We've talked a bit about this recovery, but I just wanted to make sure that this is the right approach :)
For now I've only added the case insensitive recovery to `use`s, since most other items like `impl` blocks, modules, functions can start with multiple keywords which complicates the matter.
Parser: Recover from using colon as path separator in imports
I don't know if this is the right approach, any feedback is welcome.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Fixes#103269
Avoid possible infinite loop when next_point reaching the end of file
Fixes#103451
If we return a span with `lo` = `hi`, `span_to_snippet` will always get `Ok("")`, which may introduce infinite loop if we don't care.
This PR make `find_width_of_character_at_span` return `width` with 1, so that `span_to_snippet` will get an `Err`.
Implement `std::marker::Tuple`, use it in `extern "rust-call"` and `Fn`-family traits
Implements rust-lang/compiler-team#537
I made a few opinionated decisions in this implementation, specifically:
1. Enforcing `extern "rust-call"` on fn items during wfcheck,
2. Enforcing this for all functions (not just ones that have bodies),
3. Gating this `Tuple` marker trait behind its own feature, instead of grouping it into (e.g.) `unboxed_closures`.
Still needing to be done:
1. Enforce that `extern "rust-call"` `fn`-ptrs are well-formed only if they have 1/2 args and the second one implements `Tuple`. (Doing this would fix ICE in #66696.)
2. Deny all explicit/user `impl`s of the `Tuple` trait, kinda like `Sized`.
3. Fixing `Tuple` trait built-in impl for chalk, so that chalkification tests are un-broken.
Open questions:
1. Does this need t-lang or t-libs signoff?
Fixes#99820
There are three kinds of "byte" literals: byte literals, byte string
literals, and raw byte string literals. None are allowed to have
non-ASCII chars in them.
Two `EscapeError` variants exist for when that constraint is violated.
- `NonAsciiCharInByte`: used for byte literals and byte string literals.
- `NonAsciiCharInByteString`: used for raw byte string literals.
As a result, the messages for raw byte string literals use different
wording, without good reason. Also, byte string literals are incorrectly
described as "byte constants" in some error messages.
This commit eliminates `NonAsciiCharInByteString` so the three cases are
handled similarly, and described correctly. The `mode` is enough to
distinguish them.
Note: Some existing error messages mention "byte constants" and some
mention "byte literals". I went with the latter here, because it's a
more correct name, as used by the Reference.
