Support an explicit annotation for marker traits
From the tracking issue for rust-lang/rfcs#1268:
> It seems obvious that we should make a `#[marker]` annotation. ~ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29864#issuecomment-368959441
This PR allows you to put `#[marker]` on a trait, at which point:
- [x] The trait must not have any items ~~All of the trait's items must have defaults~~
- [x] Any impl of the trait must be empty (not override any items)
- [x] But impls of the trait are allowed to overlap
r? @nikomatsakis
[NLL] Be more permissive when checking access due to Match
Partially addresses #53114. notably, we should now have parity with AST borrowck. Matching on uninitialized values is still forbidden.
* ~~Give fake borrows for match their own `BorrowKind`~~
* ~~Allow borrows with this kind to happen on values that are already mutably borrowed.~~
* ~~Track borrows with this type even behind shared reference dereferences and consider all accesses to be deep when checking for conflicts with this borrow type. See [src/test/ui/issues/issue-27282-mutate-before-diverging-arm-3.rs](cb5c989598 (diff-a2126cd3263a1f5342e2ecd5e699fbc6)) for an example soundness issue this fixes (a case of #27282 that wasn't handled correctly).~~
* Create a new `BorrowKind`: `Shallow` (name can be bike-shed)
* `Shallow` borrows differ from shared borrows in that
* When we check for access we treat them as a `Shallow(Some(_))` read
* When we check for conflicts with them, if the borrow place is a strict prefix of the access place then we don't consider that a conflict.
* For example, a `Shallow` borrow of `x` does not conflict with any access or borrow of `x.0` or `*x`
* Remove the current fake borrow in matches.
* When building matches, we take a `Shallow` borrow of any `Place` that we switch on or bind in a match, and any prefix of those places. (There are some optimizations where we do fewer borrows, but this shouldn't change semantics)
* `match x { &Some(1) => (), _ => (), }` would `Shallow` borrow `x`, `*x` and `(*x as Some).0` (the `*x` borrow is unnecessary, but I'm not sure how easy it would be to remove.)
* Replace the fake discriminant read with a `ReadForMatch`.
* Change ReadForMatch to only check for initializedness (to prevent `let x: !; match x {}`), but not conflicting borrows. It is still considered a use for liveness and `unsafe` checking.
* Give special cased error messages for this kind of borrow.
Table from the above issue after this PR
| Thing | AST | MIR | Want | Example |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |---|
| `let _ = <unsafe-field>` | 💚 | 💚 | ❌ | [playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=bb7843e42fa5318c1043d04bd72abfe4&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015) |
| `match <unsafe_field> { _ => () }` | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | [playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=3e3af05fbf1fae28fab2aaf9412fb2ea&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015) |
| `let _ = <moved>` | 💚 | 💚 | 💚 | [playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=91a6efde8288558e584aaeee0a50558b&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015) |
| `match <moved> { _ => () }` | ❌ | ❌ | 💚 | [playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=804f8185040b2fe131f2c4a64b3048ca&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015) |
| `let _ = <borrowed>` | 💚 | 💚 | 💚 | [playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=0e487c2893b89cb772ec2f2b7c5da876&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015) |
| `match <borrowed> { _ => () }` | 💚 | 💚 | 💚 | [playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=0e487c2893b89cb772ec2f2b7c5da876&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015) |
r? @nikomatsakis
[NLL] Rework checking for borrows conflicting with drops
Previously, we would split the drop access into multiple checks for each
field of a struct/tuple/closure and through `Box` dereferences. This
changes this to check if the borrow is accessed by the drop in
`places_conflict`.
We also now handle enums containing `Drop` types.
Closes#53569
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @pnkfelix
Previously, we would split the drop access into multiple checks for each
field of a struct/tuple/closure and through `Box` dereferences. This
changes this to check if the borrow is accessed by the drop in
places_conflict.
This also allows us to handle enums in a simpler way, since we don't
have to construct any new places.
When dropping a self-borrowing struct we shouldn't add a "values in a
scope are dropped in the opposite order they are defined" message,
since there is only one value being dropped.
Error now correctly checks whether the borrow that does not live
long enough is being returned before annotating the error with the
arguments and return type from the signature - as this would not be
relevant if the borrow was not being returned.
Enhances annotation logic to properly consider named lifetimes where
lifetime elision rules that were previously implemented would not apply.
Further, adds new help and note messages to diagnostics and highlights
only lifetime when dealing with named lifetimes.
This error can only occur within a function when a borrow of data owned
within the function is returned; and when there are arguments that could
have been returned instead. Therefore, it is always applicable to add a
specific note that links to the relevant rust documentation about
dangling references.
incr.comp.: Allow for more fine-grained testing of CGU reuse and use it to test incremental ThinLTO.
This adds some tests specifically targeted at incremental ThinLTO, plus the infrastructure for tracking the kind of cache hit/miss we had for a given CGU. @alexcrichton, let me know if you can think of any more tests to add. ThinLTO works rather reliably for small functions, so we should be able to test it in a robust way.
I think after this lands it might time for a "Help us test incremental ThinLTO" post on irlo.
r? @alexcrichton
Report when borrow could cause `&mut` aliasing during Drop
We were already issuing an error for the cases where this cropped up, so this is not fixing any soundness holes. The previous diagnostic just wasn't accurately describing the problem in the user's code.
Fix#52059
[NLL] Record more infomation on free region constraints in typeck
Changes:
* Makes the span of the MIR return place point to the return type
* Don't try to use a path to a type alias as a path to the adt it aliases (fixes an ICE)
* Don't claim that `self` is declared outside of the function. [see this test](f2995d5b1a (diff-0c9e6b1b204f42129b481df9ce459d44))
* Remove boring/interesting distinction and instead add a `ConstraintCategory` to the constraint.
* Add categories for implicit `Sized` and `Copy` requirements, for closure bounds, for user type annotations and `impl Trait`.
* Don't use the span of the first statement for Locations::All bounds (even if it happens to work on the tests we have)
Future work:
* Fine tuning the heuristic used to choose the place the report the error.
* Reporting multiple places (behind a flag)
* Better closure bounds reporting. This probably requires some discussion.
r? @nikomatsakis
Implement `MaybeUninit`
This PR:
- Adds `MaybeUninit` (see #53491) to `{core,std}::mem`.
- Makes `mem::{uninitialized,zeroed}` panic when they are used to instantiate an uninhabited type.
- Does *not* deprecate `mem::{uninitialized,zeroed}` just yet. As per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53491#issuecomment-414147666, we should not deprecate them until `MaybeUninit` is stabilized.
- It replaces uses of `mem::{uninitialized,zeroed}` in core and alloc with `MaybeUninit`.
There are still several instances of `mem::{uninitialized,zeroed}` in `std` that *this* PR doesn't address.
r? @RalfJung
cc @eddyb you may want to look at the new panicking logic
NLL: disallow creation of immediately unusable variables
Fix#53695
Original description follows
----
This WIP PR is for discussing the impact of fixing #53695 by injecting a fake read in let patterns.
(Travis will fail, at least the `mir-opt` suite is failing in its current state)
Rollup of 16 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53652 (define copy_within on slices)
- #54261 (Make `dyn` a keyword in the 2018 edition)
- #54280 (remove (more) CAS API from Atomic* types where not natively supported)
- #54323 (rustbuild: drop color handling)
- #54350 (Support specifying edition in doc test)
- #54370 (Improve handling of type bounds in `bit_set.rs`.)
- #54371 (add -Zui-testing to rustdoc)
- #54374 (Make 'proc_macro::MultiSpan' public.)
- #54402 (Use no_default_libraries for all NetBSD flavors)
- #54409 (Detect `for _ in in bar {}` typo)
- #54412 (add applicability to span_suggestion call)
- #54413 (Add UI test for deref recursion limit printing twice)
- #54415 (parser: Tweak function parameter parsing to avoid rollback on succesfull path)
- #54420 (Compress `Liveness` data some more.)
- #54422 (Simplify slice's first(_mut) and last(_mut) with get)
- #54446 (Unify christianpoveda's emails)
Failed merges:
- #54058 (Introduce the partition_dedup/by/by_key methods for slices)
r? @ghost
avoid leaking host details in proc macro metadata decoding
proc macro crates are essentially implemented as dynamic libraries using
a dlopen-based ABI. They are also Rust crates, so they have 2 worlds -
the "host" world in which they are defined, and the "target" world in
which they are used.
For all the "target" world knows, the proc macro crate might not even
be implemented in Rust, so leaks of details from the host to the target
must be avoided for correctness.
Because the "host" DefId space is different from the "target" DefId
space, any leak involving a DefId will have a nonsensical or
out-of-bounds DefKey, and will cause all sorts of crashes.
This PR fixes all leaks I have found in `decoder`. In particular, #54059
was caused by host native libraries leaking into the target, which feels
like it might even be a correctness issue if it doesn't cause an ICE.
Fixes#54059
Add UI test for deref recursion limit printing twice
Closes#38940
Does ``NOTE`` in the test need to be changed to ``HELP`` if its in the stderr?
``help: consider adding a `#![recursion_limit="20"]` attribute to your crate``
It doesn't appear to complaining locally that the line isn't set to ``HELP`` in the test, and the guide says
> HELP and SUGGESTION*
> * Note: SUGGESTION must follow immediately after HELP.
yet there's no concrete suggestion emitted.
r? @estebank
add -Zui-testing to rustdoc
Before we depend on the `rustdoc-ui` tests some more, let's make rustdoc act the same as the compiler when they're actually being executed.
