Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140827 (Do not ICE when reassigning in GatherLocalsVisitor on the bad path)
- #140904 (Add an issue template for future-incompatible lints)
- #140953 (Fix a compiletest blessing message)
- #140973 (Update rustix to 1.0.7 for bootstrap)
- #140976 (Add `Ipv4Addr` and `Ipv6Addr` diagnostic items)
- #140988 (MaybeUninit::write: fix doc)
- #140989 (Suggest replace f with f: Box<f> when expr field is short hand)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
At the moment, it seems like Windows Server 2025 20250504.1.0 is
misconfigured causing insufficient disk space failures. Temporarily go
back to Windows Server 2022 in the hope that those are not also
misconfigured.
Add an issue template for future-incompatible lints
This adds a GitHub issue template for future-incompatible lints. Most of the existing tracking issues have been using different formats with different information, and I think it would be helpful to make them a little more consistent and to ensure that sufficient information is provided.
Some comments on my choices:
* Added a dedicated section to describe *why* the change is being made. Many existing issues already have this, so let's standardize on it.
* Have a section with a very clear example. Almost all of the existing issues have this in one form or another.
* Added a "Recommendations" section, since this is something I see missing in several of the existing issues, and this is really important information IMHO.
* I reworded the "When" section. The existing template mentioned that these get reviewed every 6 weeks which my understanding is not true. That's also not very helpful information to the user, since it doesn't really answer the question. I'm not sure this section will actually be useful since I suspect most of the time we don't know when it will change (there have been a few exceptions).
* Clearly show the expected progression steps. Several issues already have this.
* Added implementation history, which is useful for linking PRs. (IDK, this could get merged with "Steps".)
Stage0 bootstrap update
This PR [follows the release process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-tuesday) to update the stage0 compiler.
The only thing of note is 58651d1b31, which was flagged by clippy as a correctness fix. I think allowing that lint in our case makes sense, but it's worth to have a second pair of eyes on it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Do not remove `super` keyword from `super let`
This is affecting a macro in the standard library:
bc7512ee63/library/core/src/pin.rs (L1945)
I added an exception in 6f6a9a585891d0a2d1114a7a621f35f28f39c0d9, but I'd like to remove it eventually, so opening this in-tree to not block this on the next rustfmt sync.
r? `@calebcartwright` or `@ytmimi`
Remove mono item collection strategy override from -Zprint-mono-items
Previously `-Zprint-mono-items` would override the mono item collection
strategy. When debugging one doesn't want to change the behaviour, so
this was counter productive. Additionally, the produced behaviour was
artificial and might never arise without using the option in the first
place (`-Zprint-mono-items=eager` without `-Clink-dead-code`). Finally,
the option was incorrectly marked as `UNTRACKED`.
Resolve those issues, by turning `-Zprint-mono-items` into a boolean
flag that prints results of mono item collection without changing the
behaviour of mono item collection.
For codegen-units test incorporate `-Zprint-mono-items` flag directly
into compiletest tool.
Test changes are mechanical. `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` was removed
without additional changes, and `-Zprint-mono-items=eager` was turned
into `-Clink-dead-code`. Linking dead code disables internalization, so
tests have been updated accordingly.
Update miniz_oxide dependency of coverage_dump
This was the final subproject that depended on ```miniz_oxide``` 0.7.x after the rest were when updating the ```backtrace-rs``` dependency in in #140705. Older versions of ```miniz_oxide``` got hit by a [serious](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132636) performance regression in rust 1.82 (which has been worked around in more recent versions of the library) so should really be avoided if possible (granted it only affects compression so not sure if it had much impact in practice here, though there have also been some other performance improvements since .)
This also means no longer having to build two versions of miniz_oxide as everything can now use the same version, and no longer needing to build both ```adler``` and ```adler2```
test intrinsic fallback bodies with Miri
`@Urgau` noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140792 that fallback bodies our backends don't use are untested... which is correct, and it is a problem. So this adds a testing-only flag to Miri to force the use of fallback bodies, and adds a run of the Miri test suite with that flag to CI. This should not take much more than a minute so I hope it's fine? Let's see how long it actually takes.
While at it, I made that test run also enable MIR optimizations. Miri's CI has a run with that, and it has caught mir-opt bugs in the past -- this way we'd see the CI failure earlier.
r? `@scottmcm`
Update deps of bootstrap for Cygwin
This PR just runs
```
cargo update fd-lock xattr libc errno
```
It reduces dependency on `rustix 0.38.40` and updates `libc` & `errno`. Now it compiles successfully on Cygwin:)
Fix `broken-pipe-no-ice` run-make test for rpath-less builds
The `broken-pipe-no-ice` run-make test currently fails on rpath-less builds, because host compiler runtime libs are not configured for raw std command usages.
This PR is an alternative approach to #140744. However, instead of duplicating `run_make_support::util::set_host_compiler_dylib_path` logic, we instead support "ejecting" the "configured" underlying std `Command` from `bare_rustc()` and `rustdoc()`, where host compiler runtime libs are already set.
cc `@jchecahi`
r? `@Kobzol`
also export metrics from librustdoc
Addresses the issue mentioned here: [#t-docs-rs > metrics intitiative @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/356853-t-docs-rs/topic/metrics.20intitiative/near/515714331)
The previous implementation only emitted metrics from rustc, but it turns out running `cargo doc` only calls `rustc` for dependencies, and not for the root crate being documented. We are planning to gather a sample dataset from docs.rs ci via `cargo doc` so as things stood this would not emit any metrics for any of the crates themselves that were published.
This change adds the same logic from `rustc_driver_impl` to `librustdoc` to also dump metrics at the end of its execution if they are enabled.
Note: The hash's generated by librustdoc will likely be completely different from the ones generated by rustc. This is because rustc is actually doing the various passes needed to fully calculate the stable version hash. My understanding of how rustdoc works is that the hashes generated will be working with partial information due to it only doing the work required to generate docs. The hashes will still be unique per crate and will work for the purposes of the metrics proof of concept, it would not be possible to correlate metrics generated by rustdoc with those generated by rustc for the same crate. This is fine for the purposes of the PoC but a future full implementation of metrics may want to address this issue.
rustdoc: Replace unstable flag `--doctest-compilation-args` with a simpler one: `--doctest-build-arg`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134172.
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137096#issuecomment-2776318800
Yeets the ad hoc shell-like lexer for 'nested' program arguments.
No FCP necessary since the flag is unstable.
I've chosen to replace `compilation` with `build` because it's shorter (you now need to pass it multiple times in order to pass many arguments to the doctest compiler, so it matters a bit) and since I prefer it esthetically.
**Issue**: Even though we don't process the argument passed to `--doctest-build-arg`, we end up passing it via an argument file (`rustc `@argfile`)` which delimits arguments by line break (LF or CRLF, [via](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/command-line-arguments.html#path-load-command-line-flags-from-a-path)) meaning ultimately the arguments still get split which is unfortunate. Still, I think this change is an improvement over the status quo.
I'll update the tracking issue if/once this PR merges. I'll also add the (CR)LF issue to 'unresolved question'.
r? GuillaumeGomez
r? notriddle
In rare cases, the test may need access to the underlying
`std::process::Command` (e.g. for non-trivial process spawning).
Co-authored-by: Jesus Checa Hidalgo <jchecahi@redhat.com>
Previously `-Zprint-mono-items` would override the mono item collection
strategy. When debugging one doesn't want to change the behaviour, so
this was counter productive. Additionally, the produced behaviour was
artificial and might never arise without using the option in the first
place (`-Zprint-mono-items=eager` without `-Clink-dead-code`). Finally,
the option was incorrectly marked as `UNTRACKED`.
Resolve those issues, by turning `-Zprint-mono-items` into a boolean
flag that prints results of mono item collection without changing the
behaviour of mono item collection.
For codegen-units test incorporate `-Zprint-mono-items` flag directly
into compiletest tool.
Test changes are mechanical. `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` was removed
without additional changes, and `-Zprint-mono-items=eager` was turned
into `-Clink-dead-code`. Linking dead code disables internalization, so
tests have been updated accordingly.
