Fix evaluating trivial drop glue in constants
```rust
struct A;
impl Drop for A {
fn drop(&mut self) {}
}
const FOO: Option<A> = None;
const BAR: () = (FOO, ()).1;
```
was erroring with
```
error: any use of this value will cause an error
--> src/lib.rs:9:1
|
9 | const BAR: () = (FOO, ()).1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-^
| |
| calling non-const function `std::ptr::real_drop_in_place::<(std::option::Option<A>, ())> - shim(Some((std::option::Option<A>, ())))`
|
= note: #[deny(const_err)] on by default
error: aborting due to previous error
```
before this PR. According to godbolt this last compiled successfully in 1.27
distinguish "no data" from "heterogeneous" in ABI
Ignore zero-sized types when computing whether something is a homogeneous aggregate, except be careful of VLA.
cc #56877
r? @arielb1
cc @eddyb
Print visible name for types as well as modules.
Fixes#56943 and fixes#57713.
This commit extends previous work in #55007 where the name from the
visible parent was used for modules. Now, we also print the name from
the visible parent for types.
r? @estebank
When using value after move, point at span of local
When trying to use a value after move, instead of using a note, point
at the local declaration that has a type that doesn't implement `Copy`
trait.
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `x`
--> $DIR/issue-34721.rs:27:9
|
LL | pub fn baz<T: Foo>(x: T) -> T {
| - - move occurs because `x` has type `T`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
| |
| consider adding a `Copy` constraint to this type argument
LL | if 0 == 1 {
LL | bar::bar(x.zero())
| - value moved here
LL | } else {
LL | x.zero()
| - value moved here
LL | };
LL | x.zero()
| ^ value used here after move
```
Fix#34721.
Add suggestion for incorrect field syntax.
Fixes#57684.
This commit adds a suggestion when a `=` character is used when
specifying the value of a field in a struct constructor incorrectly
instead of a `:` character.
r? @estebank
Get rid of the fake stack frame for reading from constants
r? @RalfJung
fixes the ice in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53708 but still keeps around the wrong "non-exhaustive match" error
cc @varkor
Remove quote_*! macros
This deletes a considerable amount of test cases, some of which we may want to keep. I'm not entirely certain what the primary intent of many of them was; if we should keep them I can attempt to edit each case to continue compiling without the quote_*! macros involved.
Fixes#46849.
Fixes#12265.
Fixes#12266.
Fixes#26994.
r? @Manishearth
Add intrinsic to create an integer bitmask from a vector mask
This PR adds a new simd intrinsic: `simd_bitmask(vector) -> unsigned integer` that creates an integer bitmask from a vector mask by extracting one bit of each vector lane.
This is required to implement: https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/packed_simd/issues/166 .
EDIT: the reason we need an intrinsics for this is that we have to truncate the vector lanes to an `<i1 x N>` vector, and then bitcast that to an `iN` integer (while making sure that we only materialize `i8`, ... , `i64` - that is, no `i1`, `i2`, `i4`, types), and we can't do any of that in a Rust library.
r? @rkruppe
Add error for trailing angle brackets.
Fixes#54521.
This PR adds a error (and accompanying machine applicable
suggestion) for trailing angle brackets on function calls with a
turbofish.
r? @estebank
This commit adds a suggestion when a `=` character is used when
specifying the value of a field in a struct constructor incorrectly
instead of a `:` character.
typeck: remove leaky nested probe during trait object method resolution
addresses #57673 (but not marking with f-x because thats now afflicting beta channel).
Fix#57216
Remove unnecessary dummy span checks
The emitter already verifies wether a given span note or span label
can be emitted to the output. If it can't, because it is a dummy
span, it will be either elided for labels or emitted as an unspanned
note/help when applicable.
Add signed num::NonZeroI* types
Multiple people have asked for them in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49137. Given that the unsigned ones already exist, they are very easy to add and not an additional maintenance burden.
This commit extends the trailing `>` detection to also work for paths
such as `Foo::<Bar>>:Baz`.
This involves making the existing check take the token that is expected
to follow the path being checked as a parameter.
Care is taken to ensure that this only happens on the construction of a
whole path segment and not a partial path segment (during recursion).
Through this enhancement, it was also observed that the ordering of
right shift token and greater than tokens was overfitted to the examples
being tested.
In practice, given a sequence of `>` characters: `>>>>>>>>>`
..then they will be split into `>>` eagerly: `>> >> >> >> >`.
..but when a `<` is prepended, then the first `>>` is split:
`<T> > >> >> >> >`
..and then when another `<` is prepended, a right shift is first again:
`Vec<<T>> >> >> >> >`
In the previous commits, a example that had two `<<` characters was
always used and therefore it was incorrectly assumed that `>>` would
always be first - but when there is a single `<`, this is not the case.
The diagnostic for this error prints `the following implementations
were found` followed by the first N relevant impls, sorted.
This commit makes the sort happen before slicing,
so that the set of impls being printed is deterministic
when the input is not.
This commit extends previous work in #55007 where the name from the
visible parent was used for modules. Now, we also print the name from
the visible parent for types.