rustdoc-json: Allow Typedef to be different in sanity assert
Closes#98547
This fix is a natural extension of #98053.
r? `@notriddle`
(Since you reviewed the other PR.)
CC `@GuillaumeGomez`
`@rustbot` labels +A-rustdoc-json +T-rustdoc
[RFC 2011] Optimize non-consuming operators
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44838
Fifth step of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96496
The most non-invasive approach that will probably have very little to no performance impact.
## Current behaviour
Captures are handled "on-the-fly", i.e., they are performed in the same place expressions are located.
```rust
// `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);`
if !(
{ ***try capture `a` and then return `a`*** } > 1 && { ***try capture `b` and then return `b`*** } < 100
) {
panic!( ... );
}
```
As such, some overhead is likely to occur (Specially with very large chains of conditions).
## New behaviour for non-consuming operators
When an operator is known to not take `self`, then it is possible to capture variables **AFTER** the condition.
```rust
// `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);`
if !( a > 1 && b < 100 ) {
{ ***try capture `a`*** }
{ ***try capture `b`*** }
panic!( ... );
}
```
So the possible impact on the runtime execution time will be diminished.
r? ````@oli-obk````
Remove `MAX_SUGGESTION_HIGHLIGHT_LINES`
After #97798 the `MAX_SUGGESTION_HIGHLIGHT_LINES` constant doesn't really make sense since we always show full suggestions. This PR removes last usages of the constant and the constant itself.
r? ``@flip1995`` (this mostly does changes in clippy)
Only keep a single query for well-formed checking
There are currently 3 queries to perform wf checks on different item-likes. This complexity is not required.
This PR replaces the query by:
- one query per item;
- one query to invoke it for a whole module.
This allows to remove HIR `ParItemLikeVisitor`.
Fix "kind" for associated types in trait implementations in rustdoc JSON
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81340.
Contrary to what is suggested in the issue, I really think we should distinguish between associated items and "normal" constants and types.
cc `@CraftSpider` `@SimonSapin`
r? `@notriddle`
Fix rustdoc argument error
Fixes#88756.
It's a take over of #88831. I cherry-picked the commits, fixed the merge conflict and the failing test.
cc `@inashivb` `@jyn514`
r? `@notriddle`
Check ADT field is well-formed before checking it is sized
Fixes#96810.
There is one diagnostics regression, in [`src/test/ui/generic-associated-types/bugs/issue-80626.stderr`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97780/files#diff-53795946378e78a0af23a10277c628ff79091c18090fdc385801ee70c1ba6963). I am not super concerned about it, since it's GAT related.
We _could_ fix it, possibly by using the `FieldSized` obligation cause code instead of `BuiltinDerivedObligation`. But that would require changing `Sized` trait confirmation and the `adt_sized_constraint` query.
Rebase LLVM submodule
This is a rebase of our LLVM fork onto LLVM 14.0.5, which is intended to be the last release of the 14.x series. Additionally:
* I've dropped three patches that were needed to build on FreeBSD 11, which is no longer necessary after #97944.
* I've dropped some cherry-picks that were later reverted.
* I've cherry-picked caa2a829cd for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96797 (fyi `@Amanieu)`
These used to be used by codegen-units tests, but were switched from manually specifying directories
to just using `// incremental` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89101.
Remove the old references.
macros: use typed identifiers in diag and subdiag derive
Using typed identifiers instead of strings with the Fluent identifiers in the diagnostic and subdiagnostic derives - this enables the diagnostic derive to benefit from the compile-time validation that comes with typed identifiers, namely that use of a non-existent Fluent identifier will not compile.
r? `````@oli-obk`````
make const_err show up in future breakage reports
As tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800, const_err should become a hard error Any Day Now (TM). I'd love to move forward with that sooner rather than later; it has been deny-by-default for many years and a future incompat lint since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80394 (landed more than a year ago). Some CTFE errors are already hard errors since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86194. But before we truly make it a hard error in all cases, we now have one more intermediate step we can take -- to make it show up in future breakage reports.
Cc `````@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`````
