Allow Drop types in const's too, with #![feature(drop_types_in_const)].
Implements the remaining amendment, see #33156. cc @SergioBenitez
r? @nikomatsakis
Migrate a slew of metadata methods to queries
This PR intends to make more progress on #41417, knocking off some low-hanging fruit.
Closes#44190
cc #44137
Make the LocalKey facade of thread_local! inlineable cross-crate.
Fixes (almost*) #25088 by changing the `LocalKey` `static` `thread_local!` generates to a `const`.
This can be done because a `LocalKey` value holds no actual TLS data, only function pointers to get at said data, and it could even be made `Copy` without any negative consequences.
The recent stabilization of rvalue promotion to `'static` allows doing this without changing the API.
r? @alexcrichton
*almost because we can't yet inline `__getit` because it breaks on MSVC, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43931#issuecomment-323534214
This commit primarily removes the `stability` field from `TyCtxt` as well as its
internal mutable state, instead using a query to build the stability index as
well as primarily using queries for other related lookups.
Like previous commits the calculation of the stability index is wrapped in a
`with_ignore` node to avoid regressing the current tests, and otherwise this
commit also introduces #44232 but somewhat intentionally so.
This commit started by moving methods from `CrateStore` to queries, but it ended
up necessitating some deeper refactorings to move more items in general to
queries.
Before this commit the *resolver* would walk over the AST and process foreign
modules (`extern { .. }` blocks) and collect `#[link]` annotations. It would
then also process the command line `-l` directives and such. This information
was then stored as precalculated lists in the `CrateStore` object for iterating
over later.
After this, commit, however, this pass no longer happens during resolution but
now instead happens through queries. A query for the linked libraries of a crate
will crawl the crate for `extern` blocks and then process the linkage
annotations at that time.
rustc: Flag {i,u}128 as unsafe for FFI
These don't appear to have a stable ABI as noted in #41799 and the work in
compiler-builtins definitely seems to be confirming it!
Forward-compatibly deny drops in constants if they *could* actually run.
This is part of #40036, specifically the checks for user-defined destructor invocations on locals which *may not* have been moved away, the motivating example being:
```rust
const FOO: i32 = (HasDrop {...}, 0).1;
```
The evaluation of constant MIR will continue to create `'static` slots for more locals than is necessary (if `Storage{Live,Dead}` statements are ignored), but it shouldn't be misusable.
r? @nikomatsakis
Remove the trait selection impl in method::probe
This removes the hacky trait selection reimplementation in `method::probe`, which occasionally comes and causes problems.
There are 2 issues I've found with this approach:
1. The older implementation sometimes had a "guess" type from an impl, which allowed subtyping to work. This is why I needed to make a change in `libtest`: there's an `impl<A> Clone for fn(A)` and we're calling `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone`. The older implementation would do a subtyping between the impl type and the trait type, so it would do the check for `<fn(A) as Clone>::clone`, and confirmation would continue with the subtyping. The newer implementation directly passes `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone` to selection, which fails. I'm not sure how big of a problem that would be in reality, especially after #43690 would remove the `Clone` problem, but I still want a crater run to avoid breaking the world.
2. The older implementation "looked into" impls to display error messages. I'm not sure that's an advantage - it looked exactly 1 level deep.
r? @eddyb
feature error span on attribute for fn_must_use, SIMD/align reprs, macro reëxport
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available
error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it
would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the
attribute is removed, the function/struct/_&c._ likely still makes sense and the
program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for
the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is
little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the
feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with
the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point
to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the
function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will
compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the
`main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which
there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
Elaborate trait obligations when typechecking impls
When typechecking trait impl declarations, we only checked that bounds explictly written on the trait declaration hold.
We now also check that bounds which would have been implied by the trait reference do hold.
Fixes#43784.
Before `#[must_use]` for functions was implemented, a `#[must_use]` attribute
on a function was a no-op. To avoid a breaking change in this behavior, we add
an option for "this-and-such feature is experimental" feature-gate messages to
be a mere warning rather than a compilation-halting failure (so old code that
used to have a useless no-op `#[must_use]` attribute now warns rather than
breaking). When we're on stable, we add a help note to clarify that the feature
isn't "on."
This is in support of #43302.
We'll actually want a new "soft" warning-only gate to maintain
backwards-compatibility, but it's cleaner to start out with the established,
well-understood gate before implementing the alternative warn-only behavior in
a later commit.
This is in the matter of #43302.
Make sure crates not opting in to staged_api don't use staged_api
This also fixes the problem that with `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked` set, crates could not use `#[deprecated]`.
If you prefer, I can instead submit another version which just fixes this problem, but still allows the staged API attributes for all crates when `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked` is set. I have prepared that at <https://github.com/RalfJung/rust/tree/staged2>. As yet another alternative, @alexcrichton suggested to turn this error into a lint, but that seems to be much more work, so is it worth it?
Cc @alexcrichton #43975
syntax: Relax path grammar
TLDR: Accept the disambiguator `::` in "type" paths (`Type::<Args>`), accept the disambiguator `::` before parenthesized generic arguments (`Fn::(Args)`).
The "turbofish" disambiguator `::<>` in expression paths is a necessary evil required for path parsing to be both simple and to give reasonable results.
Since paths in expressions usually refer to values (but not necessarily, e.g. `Struct::<u8> { field: 0 }` is disambiguated, but refers to a type), people often consider `::<>` to be inherent to *values*, and not *expressions* and want to write disambiguated paths for values even in contexts where disambiguation is not strictly necessary, for example when a path is passed to a macro `m!(Vec::<i32>::new)`.
The problem is that currently, if the disambiguator is not *required*, then it's *prohibited*. This results in confusion - see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41740, https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/macro-path-uses-novel-syntax/5561.
This PR makes the disambiguator *optional* instead of prohibited in contexts where it's not strictly required, so people can pass paths to macros in whatever form they consider natural (e.g. disambiguated form for value paths).
This PR also accepts the disambiguator in paths with parenthesized arguments (`Fn::(Args)`) for consistency and to simplify testing of stuff like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/41856#issuecomment-301219194.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41740
cc @rust-lang/lang
r? @nikomatsakis
Fix ICE with elided lifetimes in return type of foreign functions
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43567
This is for a preliminary crater/cargobomb run.
Lifetime elision in foreign functions now works exactly like in other functions or function-like entities.
If the breakage is significant, I'll have to partially revert https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43543 (all the stuff that was required for dealing with late bound lifetimes in this position).
r? @eddyb
