Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111917 (Simplify duplicate checks for mir validator)
- #112008 (Fix incorrect documented default bufsize in bufreader/writer)
- #112825 (Don't call `type_of` on TAIT in defining scope in new solver)
- #113164 (Add a regression test for #109054)
- #113318 (Revert "alloc: Allow comparing Boxs over different allocators", add regression test)
- #113397 (Prefer object candidates in new selection)
- #113419 (Avoid calling item_name for RPITIT)
- #113421 (Do not assert >1 RPITITs on collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not assert >1 RPITITs on collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys
Fixes#113403
Assert on collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys is not correct when we call it from type_of(GAT). The included test is an example of a situation that collector collects 0 types.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Prefer object candidates in new selection
`dyn Any` shouldn't be using [this implementation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/trait.Any.html#impl-Any-for-T) during codegen.
Prefer object candidates over other candidates, except for other object candidates.
Revert "alloc: Allow comparing Boxs over different allocators", add regression test
Temporary fix for #113283
Adds a test to fix the regression introduced in 001b081cc1 and revert that commit. The test fails without the revert.
Don't call `type_of` on TAIT in defining scope in new solver
It's *never* productive to call `consider_auto_trait_candidate` on a TAIT in the defining scope, since it will always lead to a query cycle since we call `type_of` on the TAIT. So let's just don't.
I've reserved this behavior just to `SolverMode::Normal` just to avoid any future problems, since this is *technically* incomplete since we're discarding a candidate that could *theoretically* apply. But given such candidate assembly *always* leads to a query cycle, I think it's relatively low risk, and I could be convinced otherwise and make this apply to both solver mode. I assume it's far less likely to be encountered in coherence, though.
This is much more likely to encounter in the new solver, though it can also be encountered in the old solver too, so I'm happy to discuss whether this new behavior we even want in the first place...
I encountered this in a couple of failing UI tests:
* `tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-62000-associate-impl-trait-lifetimes.rs`
* `tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-93411.rs`
r? `@lcnr`
Fix regex lints for regex 1.9.0
regex 1.9.0 was [just released](https://blog.burntsushi.net/regex-internals/), which changes where the types are defined. Instead of updating the definitions to the ones in 1.9.0 this PR uses [`def_path_def_ids`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/clippy_utils/fn.def_path_def_ids.html) on the canonical paths so that we don't have to worry about third party crate internals
This means that it still works with older regex versions too, and will for any future layout changes. I tested it with 1.8.4 and 1.9.0
changelog: [`INVALID_REGEX`], [`TRIVIAL_REGEX`]: now works with regex 1.9.0
Replace `x` with `it`
I kept some usages of `x`:
* `x`s that are used together with `y`, `z`, ...
* `x` that shadow `it`. I use `it` for iterators out of r-a, so there were some cases that I used `it` and `x` together.
* `x` in test fixtures. Many of those `x` usages was not me so I thought it's better to keep them as is.
I tried to remove the rest, but since there was too many `x` I might missed some of them or changed some of them that I didn't want to change.
Use `llvm-config` instead of `download-ci-llvm` in PGO script
This should avoid CI breakage when the LLVM stamp is updated, and also it will avoid an unnecessary LLVM download from CI.
r? `@jyn514`
Unify getter and setter assists
This PR combines what previously have been two different files into a single file. I want to talk about the reasons why I did this. The issue that prompted this PR ( and before I forget : this pr fixes#15080 ) mentions an interesting behavior. We combine these two assists into an assist group and the order in which the assists are listed in this group changes depending on the text range of the selected area. The reason for that is that VSCode prioritizes actions that have a bigger impact in a smaller area and until now generate setter assist was only possible to be invoked for a single field whereas you could generate multiple getters for the getter assist. So I used the latter's infra to make former applicable to multiple fields, hence the unification. So this PR solves in essence
1. Make `generate setter` applicable to multiple fields
2. Provide a consistent order of the said assists in listing.
Don't show `unresolved-field` diagnostic for missing names
I don't think reporting ``"no field `[missing name]` on type `SomeType`"`` makes much sense because it's a syntax error rather than a semantic error. We already report a syntax error for it and I find it sufficient.
