Currently, rustc requires that a linkage be a product of 100% rlibs or 100%
dylibs. This is to satisfy the requirement that each object appear at most once
in the final output products. This is a bit limiting, and the upcoming libcore
library cannot exist as a dylib, so these rules must change.
The goal of this commit is to enable *some* use cases for mixing rlibs and
dylibs, primarily libcore's use case. It is not targeted at allowing an
exhaustive number of linkage flavors.
There is a new dependency_format module in rustc which calculates what format
each upstream library should be linked as in each output type of the current
unit of compilation. The module itself contains many gory details about what's
going on here.
cc #10729
Pre-step towards issue #12624 and others: Introduce ExprUseVisitor, remove the
moves computation. ExprUseVisitor is a visitor that walks the AST for a
function and calls a delegate to inform it where borrows, copies, and moves
occur.
In this patch, I rewrite the gather_loans visitor to use ExprUseVisitor, but in
future patches, I think we could rewrite regionck, check_loans, and possibly
other passes to use it as well. This would refactor the repeated code between
those places that tries to determine where copies/moves/etc occur.
r? @alexcrichton
Compile-fail tests for syntax extensions belong in this suite which has correct
dependencies on all artifacts rather than just the target artifacts.
Closes#13818
Similar to my recent changes to ~[T]/&[T], these changes remove the vstore abstraction and represent str types as ~(str) and &(str). The Option<uint> in ty_str is the length of the string, None if the string is dynamically sized.
moves computation. ExprUseVisitor is a visitor that walks the AST for a
function and calls a delegate to inform it where borrows, copies, and moves
occur.
In this patch, I rewrite the gather_loans visitor to use ExprUseVisitor, but in
future patches, I think we could rewrite regionck, check_loans, and possibly
other passes to use it as well. This would refactor the repeated code between
those places that tries to determine where copies/moves/etc occur.
Specifically, the method parameter cardinality mismatch or missing
method error message span now gets method itself exactly. It was the
whole expression.
Closes#9390Closes#13684Closes#13709
This patch removes the special auto-rooting for `@` from the borrow checker. With `@` moving into a library, it doesn't make sense to keep this code around anymore. It also simplifies `trans` by removing root checking from there
@nikomatsakis
Closes: #11586
Specifically, the method parameter cardinality mismatch or missing
method error message span now gets method itself exactly. It was the
whole expression.
Closes#9390Closes#13684Closes#13709
This allows the use of syntax extensions when cross-compiling (fixing #12102). It does this by encoding the target triple in the crate metadata and checking it when searching for files. Currently the crate triple must match the host triple when there is a macro_registrar_fn, it must match the target triple when linking, and can match either when only macro_rules! macros are used.
due to carelessness, this is pretty much a duplicate of https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/13450.
This adds the target triple to the crate metadata.
When searching for a crate the phase (link, syntax) is taken into account.
During link phase only crates matching the target triple are considered.
During syntax phase, either the target or host triple will be accepted, unless
the crate defines a macro_registrar, in which case only the host triple will
match.
This alters the borrow checker's requirements on invoking closures from
requiring an immutable borrow to requiring a unique immutable borrow. This means
that it is illegal to invoke a closure through a `&` pointer because there is no
guarantee that is not aliased. This does not mean that a closure is required to
be in a mutable location, but rather a location which can be proven to be
unique (often through a mutable pointer).
For example, the following code is unsound and is no longer allowed:
type Fn<'a> = ||:'a;
fn call(f: |Fn|) {
f(|| {
f(|| {})
});
}
fn main() {
call(|a| {
a();
});
}
There is no replacement for this pattern. For all closures which are stored in
structures, it was previously allowed to invoke the closure through `&self` but
it now requires invocation through `&mut self`.
The standard library has a good number of violations of this new rule, but the
fixes will be separated into multiple breaking change commits.
Closes#12224
This alters the borrow checker's requirements on invoking closures from
requiring an immutable borrow to requiring a unique immutable borrow. This means
that it is illegal to invoke a closure through a `&` pointer because there is no
guarantee that is not aliased. This does not mean that a closure is required to
be in a mutable location, but rather a location which can be proven to be
unique (often through a mutable pointer).
For example, the following code is unsound and is no longer allowed:
type Fn<'a> = ||:'a;
fn call(f: |Fn|) {
f(|| {
f(|| {})
});
}
fn main() {
call(|a| {
a();
});
}
There is no replacement for this pattern. For all closures which are stored in
structures, it was previously allowed to invoke the closure through `&self` but
it now requires invocation through `&mut self`.
The standard library has a good number of violations of this new rule, but the
fixes will be separated into multiple breaking change commits.
Closes#12224
[breaking-change]
When reporting "consider removing this semicolon" hint message, the
offending semicolon may come from macro call site instead of macro
itself. Using the more appropriate span makes the hint more helpful.
Closes#13428.
This gives a better NOTE error message when a privacy error is encountered with
a static method. Previously no note was emitted (due to lack of support), but
now a note is emitted indicating that the struct/enum itself is private.
Closes#13641
This gives a better NOTE error message when a privacy error is encountered with
a static method. Previously no note was emitted (due to lack of support), but
now a note is emitted indicating that the struct/enum itself is private.
Closes#13641
When reporting "consider removing this semicolon" hint message, the
offending semicolon may come from macro call site instead of macro
itself. Using the more appropriate span makes the hint more helpful.
Closes#13428.
This commit changes the way move errors are reported when some value is
captured by a PatIdent. First, we collect all of the "cannot move out
of" errors before reporting them, and those errors with the same "move
source" are reported together. If the move is caused by a PatIdent (that
binds by value), we add a note indicating where it is and suggest the
user to put `ref` if they don't want the value to move. This makes the
"cannot move out of" error in match expression nicer (though the extra
note may not feel that helpful in other places :P). For example, with
the following code snippet,
```rust
enum Foo {
Foo1(~u32, ~u32),
Foo2(~u32),
Foo3,
}
fn main() {
let f = &Foo1(~1u32, ~2u32);
match *f {
Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
Foo2(num) => (),
Foo3 => ()
}
}
```
Errors before the change:
```rust
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:11:9: 11:18 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~~~~~~~
```
After:
```rust
test.rs:9:11: 9:13 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:9 match *f {
^~
test.rs:10:14: 10:18 note: attempting to move value to here (to prevent the move, use `ref num1` or `ref mut num1` to capture value by reference)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:10:20: 10:24 note: and here (use `ref num2` or `ref mut num2`)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:11:14: 11:17 note: and here (use `ref num` or `ref mut num`)
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~
```
Close#8064
This removes the `priv` keyword from the language and removes private enum
variants as a result. The remaining use cases of private enum variants were all
updated to be a struct with one private field that is a private enum.
RFC: 0006-remove-priv
Closes#13535
