The current setup processes impl/trait items while visiting
the impl/trait. This means we basically have this setup:
<Lots> -> TypeckItemBody(Impl) -> Tables(ImplItem{0,1,2,3})
But this was largely an artifact of the older code. By moving the
processing of items into method dedicated for their use, we produce this
setup:
<Little> -> TypeckItemBody(ImplItem0) -> Tables(ImplItem0)
...
<Little> -> TypeckItemBody(ImplItem3) -> Tables(ImplItem3)
exclusive range patterns
adds `..` patterns to the language under a feature gate (`exclusive_range_pattern`).
This allows turning
``` rust
match i {
0...9 => {},
10...19 => {},
20...29 => {},
_ => {}
}
```
into
``` rust
match i {
0..10 => {},
10..20 => {},
20..30 => {},
_ => {}
}
```
travis: Get an emscripten builder online
This commit adds a new entry to the Travis matrix which will execute emscripten
test suites. Along the way it updates a few bits of the test suite to continue
passing on emscripten, such as:
* Ignoring i128/u128 tests as they're presumably just not working (didn't
investigate as to why)
* Disabling a few process tests (not working on emscripten)
* Ignore some num tests in libstd (#39119)
* Fix some warnings when compiling
Implement `#[proc_macro_attribute]`
This implements `#[proc_macro_attribute]` as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1566
The following major (hopefully non-breaking) changes are included:
* Refactor `proc_macro::TokenStream` to use `syntax::tokenstream::TokenStream`.
* `proc_macro::tokenstream::TokenStream` no longer emits newlines between items, this can be trivially restored if desired
* `proc_macro::TokenStream::from_str` does not try to parse an item anymore, moved to `impl MultiItemModifier for CustomDerive` with more informative error message
* Implement `#[proc_macro_attribute]`, which expects functions of the kind `fn(TokenStream, TokenStream) -> TokenStream`
* Reactivated `#![feature(proc_macro)]` and gated `#[proc_macro_attribute]` under it
* `#![feature(proc_macro)]` and `#![feature(custom_attribute)]` are mutually exclusive
* adding `#![feature(proc_macro)]` makes the expansion pass assume that any attributes that are not built-in, or introduced by existing syntax extensions, are proc-macro attributes
* Fix `feature_gate::find_lang_feature_issue()` to not use `unwrap()`
* This change wasn't necessary for this PR, but it helped debugging a problem where I was using the wrong feature string.
* Move "completed feature gate checking" pass to after "name resolution" pass
* This was necessary for proper feature-gating of `#[proc_macro_attribute]` invocations when the `proc_macro` feature flag isn't set.
Prototype/Litmus Test: [Implementation](https://github.com/abonander/anterofit/blob/proc_macro/service-attr/src/lib.rs#L13) -- [Usage](https://github.com/abonander/anterofit/blob/proc_macro/service-attr/examples/post_service.rs#L35)
This commit adds a new entry to the Travis matrix which will execute emscripten
test suites. Along the way it updates a few bits of the test suite to continue
passing on emscripten, such as:
* Ignoring i128/u128 tests as they're presumably just not working (didn't
investigate as to why)
* Disabling a few process tests (not working on emscripten)
* Ignore some num tests in libstd (#39119)
* Fix some warnings when compiling
E0034: provide disambiguated syntax for candidates
For a given file
```rust
trait A { fn foo(&self) {} }
trait B : A { fn foo(&self) {} }
fn bar<T: B>(a: &T) {
a.foo()
}
```
provide the following output
```
error[E0034]: multiple applicable items in scope
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | a.foo(1)
| ^^^ multiple `foo` found
|
note: candidate #1 is defined in the trait `A`
--> file.rs:2:11
|
2 | trait A { fn foo(&self, a: usize) {} }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: to use it here write `A::foo(&a, 1)` instead
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | a.foo(1)
| ^^^
note: candidate #2 is defined in the trait `B`
--> file.rs:3:15
|
3 | trait B : A { fn foo(&self, a: usize) {} }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: to use it here write `B::foo(&a, 1)` instead
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | a.foo(1)
| ^^^
```
Fix#37767.
Fix lint attributes on non-item nodes.
Currently, late lint checking uses two HIR visitors: LateContext and
IdVisitor. IdVisitor only overrides visit_id, and for each node searches
for builtin lints previously added to the session; LateContext overrides
a number of methods, and runs late lints. When LateContext encounters an
item, it first has IdVisitor walk everything in it except nested items
(OnlyBodies), then recurses into it itself - i.e. there are two separate
walks.
Aside from apparently being unnecessary, this separation prevents lint
attributes (allow/deny/warn) on non-item HIR nodes from working
properly. Test case:
```rust
// generates warning without this change
fn main() { #[allow(unreachable_code)] loop { break; break; } }
```
LateContext contains logic to merge attributes seen into the current lint
settings while walking (with_lint_attrs), but IdVisitor does not. So
such attributes will affect late lints (because they are called from
LateContext), and if the node contains any items within it, they will
affect builtin lints within those items (because that IdVisitor is run
while LateContext is within the attributed node), but otherwise the
attributes will be ignored for builtin lints.
This change simply removes IdVisitor and moves its visit_id into
LateContext itself. Hopefully this doesn't break anything...
Also added walk calls to visit_lifetime and visit_lifetime_def
respectively, so visit_lifetime_def will recurse into the lifetime and
visit_lifetime will recurse into the name. In principle this could
confuse lint plugins. This is "necessary" because walk_lifetime calls
visit_id on the lifetime; of course, an alternative would be directly
calling visit_id (which would require manually iterating over the
lifetimes in visit_lifetime_def), but that seems less clean.
Use multiline Diagnostic for "relevant impl" list
Provide the following output:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar: Foo<usize>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-21659-show-relevant-trait-impls-2.rs:38:8
|
38 | f1.foo(1usize);
| ^^^ the trait `Foo<usize>` is not implemented for `Bar`
|
= help: the following implementations were found:
<Bar as Foo<i8>>
<Bar as Foo<i16>>
<Bar as Foo<i32>>
<Bar as Foo<u8>>
and 2 others
error: aborting due to previous error
```
instead of
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar: Foo<usize>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-21659-show-relevant-trait-impls-2.rs:38:8
|
38 | f1.foo(1usize);
| ^^^ the trait `Foo<usize>` is not implemented for `Bar`
|
= help: the following implementations were found:
= help: <Bar as Foo<i8>>
= help: <Bar as Foo<i16>>
= help: <Bar as Foo<i32>>
= help: <Bar as Foo<u8>>
= help: and 2 others
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Make tidy check for lang gate tests
Add gate tests to the checks that tidy performs. Excerpt from the commit message of the main commit:
Require compile-fail tests for new lang features
Its non trivial to test lang feature gates, and people
forget to add such tests. So we extend the features lint
of the tidy tool to ensure that all new lang features
contain a new compile-fail test.
Of course, one could drop this requirement and just
grep all tests in run-pass for #![feature(abc)] and
then run this test again, removing the mention,
requiring that it fails.
But this only tests for the existence of a compilation
failure. Manual tests ensure that also the correct lines
spawn the error, and also test the actual error message.
For library features, it makes no sense to require such
a test, as here code is used that is generic for all
library features.
The tidy lint extension now checks the compile-fail test suite for occurences of "gate-test-X" where X is a feature. Alternatively, it also accepts file names with the form "feature-gate-X.rs". If a lang feature is found that has no such check, we emit a tidy error.
I've applied the markings to all tests I could find in the test suite. I left a small (20 elements) whitelist of features that right now have no gate test, or where I couldn't find one. Once this PR gets merged, I'd like to close issue #22820 and open a new one on suggestion of @nikomatsakis to track the removal of all elements from that whitelist (already have a draft). Writing such a small test can be a good opportunity for a first contribution, so I won't touch it (let others have the fun xD).
cc @brson , @pnkfelix (they both discussed about this in the issue linked above).
Provide the following output:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar: Foo<usize>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-21659-show-relevant-trait-impls-2.rs:38:8
|
38 | f1.foo(1usize);
| ^^^ the trait `Foo<usize>` is not implemented for `Bar`
|
= help: the following implementations were found:
<Bar as Foo<i8>>
<Bar as Foo<i16>>
<Bar as Foo<i32>>
<Bar as Foo<u8>>
and 2 others
error: aborting due to previous error
```
instead of
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar: Foo<usize>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-21659-show-relevant-trait-impls-2.rs:38:8
|
38 | f1.foo(1usize);
| ^^^ the trait `Foo<usize>` is not implemented for `Bar`
|
= help: the following implementations were found:
= help: <Bar as Foo<i8>>
= help: <Bar as Foo<i16>>
= help: <Bar as Foo<i32>>
= help: <Bar as Foo<u8>>
= help: and 2 others
error: aborting due to previous error
```
resolve: Do not use "resolve"/"resolution" in error messages
Use less jargon-y wording instead.
`cannot find <struct> <S> in <this scope>` and `cannot find <struct> <S> in <module a::b>` are used for base messages (this also harmonizes nicely with "you can import it into scope" suggestions) and `not found in <this scope>` and `not found in <a::b>` are used for short labels in fall-back case.
I tweaked some other diagnostics to avoid using "resolve" (see, e.g., `librustc_resolve/macros.rs`), but haven't touched messages for imports.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38750
r? @nrc
For a given file
```rust
trait A { fn foo(&self) {} }
trait B : A { fn foo(&self) {} }
fn bar<T: B>(a: &T) {
a.foo()
}
```
provide the following output
```
error[E0034]: multiple applicable items in scope
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | a.foo(1)
| ^^^ multiple `foo` found
|
note: candidate #1 is defined in the trait `A`
--> file.rs:2:11
|
2 | trait A { fn foo(&self, a: usize) {} }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: to use it here write `A::foo(&a, 1)` instead
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | a.foo(1)
| ^^^
note: candidate #2 is defined in the trait `B`
--> file.rs:3:15
|
3 | trait B : A { fn foo(&self, a: usize) {} }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: to use it here write `B::foo(&a, 1)` instead
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | a.foo(1)
| ^^^
```
