Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143069 (Add fast-path for accessing the current thread id)
- rust-lang/rust#146518 (Improve the documentation around `ZERO_AR_DATE`)
- rust-lang/rust#146596 (Add a dummy codegen backend)
- rust-lang/rust#146617 (Don’t suggest foreign `doc(hidden)` types in "the following other types implement trait" diagnostics)
- rust-lang/rust#146635 (cg_llvm: Stop using `as_c_char_ptr` for coverage-related bindings)
- rust-lang/rust#147184 (Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver
The diff is trivial, of course, and basically what you already suggested. Mostly dug around a bunch to learn. I hope this is roughly what you had in mind.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/236.
r? `@lcnr`
Don’t suggest foreign `doc(hidden)` types in "the following other types implement trait" diagnostics
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132024.
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics T-compiler
cmse: fix 'region variables should not be hashed'
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81391
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131639
Some background: the `cmse-nonsecure-call` calling convention is used for a call from "secure" to "non-secure" code. To make sure that "non-secure" cannot read any secrets, restrictions are put on the signatures of functions with this calling convention: they can only use 4 arguments for passing arguments, and one register for passing a result. No arguments are passed via the stack, and all other registers are cleared before the call.
We check during `hir_ty_lowering` that the signature follows these rules. We do that by determining and then inspecting the layout of the type. That works well overall, but can run into asserts when the type itself is ill-formed. This PR fixes one such case.
I believe that the fix here, just erasing the regions, is the right shape, but there may be some nuance that I'm missing.
r? types
Point at fn bound that introduced lifetime obligation
The last note is new
```
error[E0597]: `c` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/without-precise-captures-we-are-powerless.rs:19:20
|
LL | fn simple<'a>(x: &'a i32) {
| -- lifetime `'a` defined here
...
LL | let c = async move || { println!("{}", *x); };
| - binding `c` declared here
LL | outlives::<'a>(c());
| ---------------^---
| | |
| | borrowed value does not live long enough
| argument requires that `c` is borrowed for `'a`
LL | outlives::<'a>(call_once(c));
LL | }
| - `c` dropped here while still borrowed
|
note: requirement that `c` is borrowed for `'a` introduced here
--> $DIR/without-precise-captures-we-are-powerless.rs:7:33
|
LL | fn outlives<'a>(_: impl Sized + 'a) {}
| ^^
```
When encountering a `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` in a funtion call, point at the `Span` for that `Predicate` to explain where the lifetime obligation originates from.
CC rust-lang/rust#55307.
Make replacement suggestion `_` in type verbose
```
error[E0121]: the placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures for return types
--> $DIR/in-signature.rs:6:21
|
LL | fn arr_fn() -> [u8; _] {
| ^ not allowed in type signatures
|
help: replace with the correct return type
|
LL - fn arr_fn() -> [u8; _] {
LL + fn arr_fn() -> [u8; 3] {
|
```
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146653 (improve diagnostics for empty attributes)
- rust-lang/rust#146987 (impl Ord for params and use unstable sort)
- rust-lang/rust#147101 (Use `Iterator::eq` and (dogfood) `eq_by` in compiler and library )
- rust-lang/rust#147123 (Fix removed version numbers of `doc_auto_cfg` and `doc_cfg_hide`)
- rust-lang/rust#147149 (add joboet to library review rotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
improve diagnostics for empty attributes
Adds a note about them not having any effect. This was previously done for `feature` attributes but no other attributes. In [converting the `feature` parser](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146652) I removed that note. This PR adds it back in and makes it so all attributes benefit from it.
Not blocked on rust-lang/rust#146652, either can merge first
tests: Remove ignore-android directive for fixed issue
rust-lang/rust#120567 is marked as fixed, so let's see if we can remove the ignore directives tied to that issue.
<!-- Note to self: wait for https://github.com/rust-lang/team/pull/2002 -->
try-job: arm-android
Detect tuple structs that are unconstructable due to re-export
When a tuple-struct is re-exported that has inaccessible fields at the `use` scope, the type's constructor cannot be accessed through that re-export. We now account for this case and extend the resulting resolution error. We also check if the constructor would be accessible directly, not through the re-export, and if so, we suggest using the full path instead.
```
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:12:33
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::Foo(42);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the type is accessed through this re-export, but the type's constructor is not visible in this import's scope due to private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:3:9
|
LL | pub use my_mod::Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
help: the type can be constructed directly, because its fields are available from the current scope
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::my_mod::Foo(42);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Fix#133343.
When a tuple-struct is re-exported that has inaccessible fields at the `use` scope, the type's constructor cannot be accessed through that re-export. We now account for this case and extend the resulting resolution error. We also check if the constructor would be accessible directly, not through the re-export, and if so, we suggest using the full path instead.
```
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:12:33
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::Foo(42);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the type is accessed through this re-export, but the type's constructor is not visible in this import's scope due to private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:3:9
|
LL | pub use my_mod::Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
help: the type can be constructed directly, because its fields are available from the current scope
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::my_mod::Foo(42);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Fix#133343.
```
error[E0716]: temporary value dropped while borrowed
--> $DIR/multiple-sources-for-outlives-requirement.rs:5:38
|
LL | fn foo<'b>() {
| -- lifetime `'b` defined here
LL | outlives_indir::<'_, 'b, _>(&mut 1u32);
| ---------------------------------^^^^-- temporary value is freed at the end of this statement
| | |
| | creates a temporary value which is freed while still in use
| argument requires that borrow lasts for `'b`
|
note: requirements that the value outlives `'b` introduced here
--> $DIR/multiple-sources-for-outlives-requirement.rs:1:23
|
LL | fn outlives_indir<'a: 'b, 'b, T: 'a>(_x: T) {}
| ^^ ^^
```
```
error[E0597]: `c` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/without-precise-captures-we-are-powerless.rs:19:20
|
LL | fn simple<'a>(x: &'a i32) {
| -- lifetime `'a` defined here
...
LL | let c = async move || { println!("{}", *x); };
| - binding `c` declared here
LL | outlives::<'a>(c());
| ---------------^---
| | |
| | borrowed value does not live long enough
| argument requires that `c` is borrowed for `'a`
LL | outlives::<'a>(call_once(c));
LL | }
| - `c` dropped here while still borrowed
|
note: requirement that `c` is borrowed for `'a` introduced here
--> $DIR/without-precise-captures-we-are-powerless.rs:7:33
|
LL | fn outlives<'a>(_: impl Sized + 'a) {}
| ^^
```
When encountering a `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` in a funtion call, point at the `Span` for that `Predicate` to explain where the lifetime obligation originates from.
Allow `&raw [mut | const]` for union field in safe code
fixesrust-lang/rust#141264
r? ``@Veykril``
Unresolved questions:
- [x] Any edge cases?
- [x] How this works with rust-analyzer (because all I've did is prevent compiler from emitting error in `&raw` context) (rust-lang/rust-analyzer#19867)
- [x] Should we allow `addr_of!` and `addr_of_mut!` as well? In current version they both (`&raw` and `addr_of!`) are allowed (They are the same)
- [x] Is chain of union fields is a safe? (Yes)
fix rebasing cycle heads when not reaching a fixpoint
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/232
annoyingly subtle, imagine the following proof tree
- A (no cycle head usages, final result Y)
- *ignored* B (depends on A with provisional result X)
- A (cycle, provisional result X)
- B (using the cache entry here incorrectly assumes A has final result X)
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
Clarified error note for usize range matching
Fixesrust-lang/rust#146476
This is kinda rough, but it gets the point across a little better and stays short.
Remove most `#[track_caller]` from allocating Vec methods
They cause significant binary size overhead while contributing little value.
closesrust-lang/rust#146963, see that issue for more details.
Introduce CoerceShared lang item and trait, and basic Reborrow tests
Part of rust-lang/rust#145612: This introduces the `CoerceShared` trait which is the `Reborrow` equivalent of a `&mut T` -> `&T` coercion. The trait has a `Target` GAT which makes this (currently) unique in the `core/src/marker.rs`; I'm not sure if this can be considered problematic. Maybe this is not the way such things should be done at the marker trait level? Or maybe it is fine.
Improtantly, this PR introduces a battery of basic `Reborrow` and `CoerceShared` tests. These test the very basics of the feature; custom marker types intended to have exclusive semantics (`Custom<'a>(PhantomData<&'a mut ()>)`), custom exclusive reference wrappers, and standard library exclusive reference wrappers (`Pin<&mut T>` and `Option<&mut T>`). None of these of course work since the implementation for `Reborrow` and `CoerceShared` is entirely missing, but this is the first step towards making these work.
Future PRs will introduce more tests, such as "recursive" reborrowing (ie. reborrowing structs that contain multiple reborrowable fields) and checks around the lifetime semantics of reborrowing ie. that a reborrow produces a new type with the same lifetime as the original.
