Add PrintTAFn flag for targeted type analysis printing
## Summary
This PR adds a new `PrintTAFn` flag to the `-Z autodiff` option that allows printing type analysis information for a specific function, rather than all functions.
## Changes
### New Flag
- Added `PrintTAFn=<function_name>` option to `-Z autodiff`
- Usage: `-Z autodiff=Enable,PrintTAFn=my_function_name`
### Implementation Details
- **Rust side**: Added `PrintTAFn(String)` variant to `AutoDiff` enum
- **Parser**: Updated `parse_autodiff` to handle `PrintTAFn=<function_name>` syntax with proper error handling
- **FFI**: Added `set_print_type_fun` function to interface with Enzyme's `FunctionToAnalyze` command line option
- **Documentation**: Updated help text and documentation for the new flag
### Files Modified
- `compiler/rustc_session/src/config.rs`: Added `PrintTAFn(String)` variant
- `compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs`: Updated parser and help text (now shows `PrintTAFn` in the list)
- `compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/enzyme_ffi.rs`: Added FFI function and static variable
- `compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs`: Added handling for new flag
- `src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/autodiff/flags.md`: Updated documentation
- `src/doc/unstable-book/src/compiler-flags/autodiff.md`: Updated documentation
## Testing
The flag can be tested with:
```bash
rustc +enzyme -Z autodiff=Enable,PrintTAFn=square test.rs
```
This will print type analysis information only for the function named "square" instead of all functions.
## Error Handling
The parser includes proper error handling:
- Missing argument: `PrintTAFn` without `=<function_name>` will show an error
- Unknown options: Invalid autodiff options will be reported
r? ```@ZuseZ4```
Tweak `-Zmacro-stats` measurement.
It currently reports net size, i.e. size(output) - size(input). After some use I think this is sub-optimal, and it's better to just report size(output). Because for derive macros the input size is always 1, and for attribute macros it's almost always 1.
r? ```@petrochenkov```
Add `#[loop_match]` for improved DFA codegen
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132306
project goal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/258
This PR adds the `#[loop_match]` attribute, which aims to improve code generation for state machines. For some (very exciting) benchmarks, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/258#issuecomment-2732965199
Currently, a very restricted syntax pattern is accepted. We'd like to get feedback and merge this now before we go too far in a direction that others have concerns with.
## current state
We accept code that looks like this
```rust
#[loop_match]
loop {
state = 'blk: {
match state {
State::A => {
#[const_continue]
break 'blk State::B
}
State::B => { /* ... */ }
/* ... */
}
}
}
```
- a loop should have the same semantics with and without `#[loop_match]`: normal `continue` and `break` continue to work
- `#[const_continue]` is only allowed in loops annotated with `#[loop_match]`
- the loop body needs to have this particular shape (a single assignment to the match scrutinee, with the body a labelled block containing just a match)
## future work
- perform const evaluation on the `break` value
- support more state/scrutinee types
## maybe future work
- allow `continue 'label value` syntax, which `#[const_continue]` could then use.
- allow the match to be on an arbitrary expression (e.g. `State::Initial`)
- attempt to also optimize `break`/`continue` expressions that are not marked with `#[const_continue]`
r? ``@traviscross``
Remove the deprecated unstable `concat_idents!` macro
In [rust-lang/rust#137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate
and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The
deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version
1.90).
This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}`
metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the
limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably
available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature.
History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011
when it was introduced with 513276e595 ("Add #concat_idents[] and
#ident_to_str[]"). The syntax looks a bit different but it still works
about the same:
let asdf_fdsa = "<.<";
assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<");
assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction]
== "use_mention_distinction");
(That test existed from introduction until its removal here.)
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599
[rust-lang/rust#137653]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653
[`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
In [137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate
and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The
deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version
1.90).
This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}`
metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the
limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably
available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature.
History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011
when it was introduced with 513276e595 ("Add #concat_idents[] and
about the same:
let asdf_fdsa = "<.<";
assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<");
assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction]
== "use_mention_distinction");
(That test existed from introduction until its removal here.)
Closes: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599
[137653]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653
[`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
It currently reports net size, i.e. size(output) - size(input). After
some use I think this is sub-optimal, and it's better to just report
size(output). Because for derive macros the input size is always 1, and
for attribute macros it's almost always 1.
Document subdirectories of UI tests with README files
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895 and the [2025 Google Summer of Code](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/05/08/gsoc-2025-selected-projects/) associated project.
When adding a new UI test, one is faced with hundreds of subdirectories in `tests/ui` reflecting various categories. Knowing where to put the new test is not trivial, as many of the categories have slightly misleading names. For example, `moves` does not only refer to the `move` keyword but to functions taking ownership in general, whereas `allocator` does not refer to allocation in general but rather to the very specific `allocator_api` and `global_allocator` features.
Many contributors will therefore place their test at the top level of ̀`tests/ui` where it will be mixed with hundreds of unrelated tests.
This PR is a tentative move towards more clearly defined tag/categories, with a SUMMARY.md file documenting the true purpose of each subdirectory, placed inside `tests/ui`.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
correct template for `#[align]` attribute
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142507
I didn't fully understand what `template!` did, clearly. An empty `#[align]` attribute was still rejected later, but without this change it does get suggested in certain cases.
I've also updated some outdated references to `#[repr(align)]` on functions.
r? ``@jdonszelmann``
Update books
## rust-lang/book
1 commits in 4433c9f0cad8460bee05ede040587f8a1fa3f1de..8a6d44e45b7b564eeb6bae30507e1fbac439d72d
2025-06-18 17:06:36 UTC to 2025-06-18 17:06:36 UTC
- Chapter 12 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4410)
## rust-lang/reference
6 commits in d4c66b346f4b72d29e70390a3fa3ea7d4e064db1..50fc1628f36563958399123829c73755fa7a8421
2025-06-19 02:02:39 UTC to 2025-06-17 21:18:46 UTC
- Document inferred const args (`feature(generic_arg_infer)`) (rust-lang/reference#1835)
- const_eval: we allow references to statics and promoteds (rust-lang/reference#1858)
- Fix missing rule on destructors (rust-lang/reference#1861)
- Fix inconsistent heading depth (rust-lang/reference#1860)
- Fix recursive root-accessible grammar check (rust-lang/reference#1852)
- Fix grammar links (rust-lang/reference#1851)
## rust-lang/rust-by-example
1 commits in 9baa9e863116cb9524a177d5a5c475baac18928a..05c7d8bae65f23a1837430c5a19be129d414f5ec
2025-06-18 13:15:17 UTC to 2025-06-18 13:15:17 UTC
- Revert "introduce new ````@media```` query to set a higher content width on ultra wide screens" (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1939)
{aarch64,x86_64}-pc-windows-gnullvm: build host tools
This is a temporary single-release workflow to create stage0 for these targets.
I opted for bootstrapping from Linux because that's the easiest host system to work with, but once this hits beta, having dedicated Windows runners would be sensible and probably preferable.
`--enable-full-tools` for whatever reason doesn't seem to work when cross-compiling, because LLVM tools for the new hosts are not copied into the expected directory.
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/877
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#135656 (Add `-Z hint-mostly-unused` to tell rustc that most of a crate will go unused)
- rust-lang/rust#138237 (Get rid of `EscapeDebugInner`.)
- rust-lang/rust#141614 (lint direct use of rustc_type_ir )
- rust-lang/rust#142123 (Implement initial support for timing sections (`--json=timings`))
- rust-lang/rust#142377 (Try unremapping compiler sources)
- rust-lang/rust#142674 (remove duplicate crash test)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement initial support for timing sections (`--json=timings`)
This PR implements initial support for emitting high-level compilation section timings. The idea is to provide a very lightweight way of emitting durations of various compilation sections (frontend, backend, linker, or on a more granular level macro expansion, typeck, borrowck, etc.). The ultimate goal is to stabilize this output (in some form), make Cargo pass `--json=timings` and then display this information in the HTML output of `cargo build --timings`, to make it easier to quickly profile "what takes so long" during the compilation of a Cargo project. I would personally also like if Cargo printed some of this information in the interactive `cargo build` output, but the `build --timings` use-case is the main one.
Now, this information is already available with several other sources, but I don't think that we can just use them as they are, which is why I proposed a new way of outputting this data (`--json=timings`):
- This data is available under `-Zself-profile`, but that is very expensive and forever unstable. It's just a too big of a hammer to tell us the duration it took to run the linker.
- It could also be extracted with `-Ztime-passes`. That is pretty much "for free" in terms of performance, and it can be emitted in a structured form to JSON via `-Ztime-passes-format=json`. I guess that one alternative might be to stabilize this flag in some form, but that form might just be `--json=timings`? I guess what we could do in theory is take the already emitted time passes and reuse them for `--json=timings`. Happy to hear suggestions!
I'm sending this PR mostly for a vibeck, to see if the way I implemented it is passable. There are some things to figure out:
- How do we represent the sections? Originally I wanted to output `{ section, duration }`, but then I realized that it might be more useful to actually emit `start` and `end` events. Both because it enables to see the output incrementally (in case compilation takes a long time and you read the outputs directly, or Cargo decides to show this data in `cargo build` some day in the future), and because it makes it simpler to represent hierarchy (see below). The timestamps currently emit microseconds elapsed from a predetermined point in time (~start of rustc), but otherwise they are fully opaque, and should be only ever used to calculate the duration using `end - start`. We could also precompute the duration for the user in the `end` event, but that would require doing more work in rustc, which I would ideally like to avoid :P
- Do we want to have some form of hierarchy? I think that it would be nice to show some more granular sections rather than just frontend/backend/linker (e.g. macro expansion, typeck and borrowck as a part of the frontend). But for that we would need some way of representing hierarchy. A simple way would be something like `{ parent: "frontend" }`, but I realized that with start/end timestamps we get the hierarchy "for free", only the client will need to reconstruct it from the order of start/end events (e.g. `start A`, `start B` means that `B` is a child of `A`).
- What exactly do we want to stabilize? This is probably a question for later. I think that we should definitely stabilize the format of the emitted JSON objects, and *maybe* some specific section names (but we should also make it clear that they can be missing, e.g. you don't link everytime you invoke `rustc`).
The PR be tested e.g. with `rustc +stage1 src/main.rs --json=timings --error-format=json -Zunstable-options` on a crate without dependencies (it is not easy to use `--json` with stock Cargo, because it also passes this flag to `rustc`, so this will later need Cargo integration to be usable with it).
Zulip discussions: [#t-compiler > Outputting time spent in various compiler sections](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Outputting.20time.20spent.20in.20various.20compiler.20sections/with/518850162)
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/873
r? ``@nnethercote``
Add `-Z hint-mostly-unused` to tell rustc that most of a crate will go unused
This hint allows the compiler to optimize its operation based on this assumption, in order to compile faster. This is a hint, and does not guarantee any particular behavior.
This option can substantially speed up compilation if applied to a large dependency where the majority of the dependency does not get used. This flag may slow down compilation in other cases.
Currently, this option makes the compiler defer as much code generation as possible from functions in the crate, until later crates invoke those functions. Functions that never get invoked will never have code generated for them. For instance, if a crate provides thousands of functions, but only a few of them will get called, this flag will result in the compiler only doing code generation for the called functions. (This uses the same mechanisms as cross-crate inlining of functions.) This does not affect `extern` functions, or functions marked as `#[inline(never)]`.
This option has already existed in nightly as `-Zcross-crate-inline-threshold=always` for some time, and has gotten testing in that form. However, this option is still unstable, to give an opportunity for wider testing in this form.
Some performance numbers, based on a crate with many dependencies having just *one* large dependency set to `-Z hint-mostly-unused` (using Cargo's `profile-rustflags` option):
A release build went from 4m07s to 2m04s.
A non-release build went from 2m26s to 1m28s.
